Bluray vs HD DVD

[Poseidon©]

Every Micro$oft fanboy says that Bluray doesn't matter. I beg to differ.

 

First of all, lets talk about capacity. Bluray can hold all the way up to 25 to 50 GB (single-layer), and 50 to 100 GB (dual-layer). HD DVD can hold up all the way to 15 GB per layer. The problem is that the Xbox can only hold up to 9 GB per disc.

 

With more capacity, comes more CONTENT. This also mean it can use UNCOMPRESSED music, video, etc. Do you ever wonder how the PS3 can produce graphics like GoW3? There's your answer.

 

Also, developers are now complaining about the capacity of HD DVD's.

 

Anyway, discuss about the format war.

[Wuu.]

I don't give a funking sheet about HD DVD or Bluray.

The only thing i gotta say is, funk Microsoft for putting the Xbox360 together like a piece of turd.

[Guest JoshIcy]

Watch your mouth >_>"...

 

But I prefer Blu-ray if for the sake of name. It doesn't matter to me, as long as you can use traditional TV sets while using the disc.

[Brushfire]

Blu-ray is simply better. There is no argument.

 

And I have an XBOX 360.

[.:Shaymin:.]

Blu-Ray is way better

 

Its not uncompressed

 

Best of All

 

PS3 is the only game system that plays Blu-Ray

[Twig]

Blu-ray is obviously better.

 

Did you hear that the Xbox360 version of FFXIII has more than one disc?

[.:Shaymin:.]

Blu-ray is obviously better.

 

Did you hear that the Xbox360 version of FFXIII has more than one disc?

 

thats awful how you have to switch discs

 

it ruins the moment

[Scyire]

I have a feeling this will turn into a 360 v. PS3 discussion.

 

Anyways, I like Blu-ray better.

[Cyber Altair]

I just remembered this troll whining about Uncompressed music XD

 

Anyway The blu-Ray has a slower reading speed compared to the Dual Layer DVD's which is what the 360 uses amirght? Wasn't the HD-DVD a fad, Microsoft made external readers that failed when the HD-DVD's failed?