Elemental Hero Prisma Rulings

[Psycho Shocker Android]

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Elemental_Hero_Prisma

 

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Rulings:Elemental_Hero_Prisma

 

TCG rulings says:

 

The Fusion Material Monster is sent from your Deck to the Graveyard when "Elemental Hero Prisma's" effect resolves.

 

OCG rulings says:

 

Showing 1 Fusion Monster to your opponent and sending 1 Fusion Material Monster to your Graveyard is a cost to activate the effect.

 

WTF!

 

Also, the card text would let you beleive the OCG ruling is the good one.

 

Effect:

Once per turn, you can reveal 1 Fusion Monster from your Extra Deck and send 1 Fusion Material Monster listed on that card from your Deck to the Graveyard. Until the End Phase this card's name is treated as the sent monster's name.

 

Discuss.

[Azuh]

I just dont see why the rulings cannot be the same in both TCG and OCG

[Manjoume Thunder]

The "Shrink" case is worse.

[iAmNateXero]

If it was a cost that and would be a to.

[Kyosuke Kiryu]

The "Shrink" case is worse.

 

It's more of a Gale case now.

[Manjoume Thunder]

The "Shrink" case is worse.

 

It's more of a Gale case now.

 

No. The "Shrink" case is different. The "Gale" case was fixed.

[Kyosuke Kiryu]

The "Shrink" case is worse.

 

It's more of a Gale case now.

 

No. The "Shrink" case is different. The "Gale" case was fixed.

 

Hmm, what other card halves ATK..?

[daboss144]

The "Shrink" case is worse.

 

It's more of a Gale case now.

 

No. The "Shrink" case is different. The "Gale" case was fixed.

 

Hmm' date=' what other card halves ATK..?

[/quote']

 

Dreadroot... but that's irrelevant

[darkwolf777]

The difference between Gale and Shrink is that Gale reduces OVERALL ATK while Shrink only reduces Original Attack. I wasn't aware Gale was having issues with its effect. Black Garden also halves overall attack while we're naming cards that halve attack.

 

Edit: TCG rulings suck~ Even simply reading the card shows that Revealing the card and removing the card from the deck is the cost x.o (then again, there was that one card where the first line of the TCG stated "Discard 1 card." but it was actually an effect of the card rather than a cost in both OCG and TCG so even then TCG fails to word things properly to in some cases x.o

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

If it was a cost that and would be a to.

 

This is true. Through experience this would be the case, but the OCG rulings should be the TCG rulings if they were made first, they are the "Official Card Game"

[iAmNateXero]

I always thought the "O" stood for original.

[-Berserker-]

The difference between Gale and Shrink is that Gale reduces OVERALL ATK while Shrink only reduces Original Attack. I wasn't aware Gale was having issues with its effect. Black Garden also halves overall attack while we're naming cards that halve attack.

 

Edit: TCG rulings suck~ Even simply reading the card shows that Revealing the card and removing the card from the deck is the cost x.o

 

For me' date=' it looks like an effect, not a cost.

 

(then again, there was that one card where the first line of the TCG stated "Discard 1 card." but it was actually an effect of the card rather than a cost in both OCG and TCG so even then TCG fails to word things properly to in some cases x.o

[/quote']

 

You are talking about Graywing, the base card of Dark World Simorgh?

[darkwolf777]

The difference between Gale and Shrink is that Gale reduces OVERALL ATK while Shrink only reduces Original Attack. I wasn't aware Gale was having issues with its effect. Black Garden also halves overall attack while we're naming cards that halve attack.

 

Edit: TCG rulings suck~ Even simply reading the card shows that Revealing the card and removing the card from the deck is the cost x.o

 

For me' date=' it looks like an effect, not a cost.

 

(then again, there was that one card where the first line of the TCG stated "Discard 1 card." but it was actually an effect of the card rather than a cost in both OCG and TCG so even then TCG fails to word things properly to in some cases x.o

[/quote']

 

You are talking about Graywing, the base card of Dark World Simorgh?

 

I figured out the card I was thinking of was "Bone Temple Block" whose first line is "Discard 1 card" yet it is not a cost.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

There is that one quick-play spell card that says you and your opponent can ss upto 2 monsters from your removed from play, but it's ruled that your opponent has to have cards removed to work... how does "up to 2" translate to "if both you and your opponent have at least 1 monster removed from play, you may both special summon up to 2 monster from your respective rfp"