CrazyKev Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 What has been? 6 months? 8? Rusty as ever, but I was never that good to start with =/ Should I remove that lens flare, makes a bad source of lighting in my opinion =/ but there's no other way.But then again, it looks fine in another view. And there I go, arguing with myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Lens flare looks a bit... not good. Use Lighting Effects instead (ur using gimp right?).I however love the lightning effects on the left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DG- Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 PS. The Lens flare seems random, so I suggest getting rid of it. Maybe try and figure out a way to implement field lights?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 <3 teh effects/style. Looks a bit sharp, but it seems to fit the style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 what's with the black on the right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmc1234 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Bret farve = Fail effects are cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyKev Posted January 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 PS. The Lens flare seems random' date=' so I suggest getting rid of it. Maybe try and figure out a way to implement field lights??[/quote'] I was planning on that, but unfortunately i forgot to use a football field stock at the beginning. That way it would have been easier for that, but now its pretty hard. And yes, i do use PS. I stopped with GIMP when I got PS. The black was because the reason described above, originally it was dark green though Bret Favre = Pure Win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DG- Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Oh, I know ^+^ I can tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Dimercurio Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I like this alot... Football + Electricity = AWESOME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yasu Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Lens flare is fugly imo, otherwise I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Get cho Brett Farve outa mah packars.We dun want him anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/성成현賢/.led Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 - The lens flare is random and detracts from the focal...- Flow is nice...- Depth needs to be more obvious (IE Stock, C4D, etc...)- Lighting needs to be fixed (Burn and Dodge tools) Its solid but could be better... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I actually think you're better than ever, I love this one, but the lens flare as said over and over again does not work, and it's pretty distracting too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyKev Posted January 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 i'm keeping the lens flare because i'm too lazy to fix it.but now i know not to do it again. @FickoThe Packers are just mad because they didn't get far without him, you see, they need him.He's a great addition to the Vikings though, thanks Greenbay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHN. Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Lens flare (as mentioned) is distracting. Otherwise its OK. Like teh effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 i'm keeping the lens flare because i'm too lazy to fix it.but now i know not to do it again. @FickoThe Packers are just mad because they didn't get far without him' date=' you see, they need him.He's a great addition to the Vikings though, thanks Greenbay[/quote'] Didn't get far?We got to the playoffs, and lost.The vikings got a smidge farther in the playoffs. And lost.The Jets sucked last year.Green Bay is 2 words. Quite frankly, the vikings are aweful without Brett.The Packers are decent without Brett and whatever team has Brett next season will be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Lens flare looks random, and just kills the tag. Without it, this would look much better. But still Awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyKev Posted January 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 i'm keeping the lens flare because i'm too lazy to fix it.but now i know not to do it again. @FickoThe Packers are just mad because they didn't get far without him' date=' you see, they need him.He's a great addition to the Vikings though, thanks Greenbay[/quote'] Didn't get far? In the play offsWe got to the playoffs, and lost. To the Cardinals? The vikings got a smidge farther in the playoffs. And lost. Saints got luckyThe Jets sucked last year. They always doGreen Bay is 2 words. So? Quite frankly, the vikings are aweful without Brett. I agree.The Packers are decent without Brett and whatever team has Brett next season will be good. I also agree Don't get me wrong, I like Green Bay, but still prefer the Vikings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 i'm keeping the lens flare because i'm too lazy to fix it.but now i know not to do it again. @FickoThe Packers are just mad because they didn't get far without him' date=' you see, they need him.He's a great addition to the Vikings though, thanks Greenbay[/quote'] Didn't get far? In the play offsWe got to the playoffs, and lost. To the Cardinals? The vikings got a smidge farther in the playoffs. And lost. Saints got luckyThe Jets sucked last year. They always doGreen Bay is 2 words. So? Quite frankly, the vikings are aweful without Brett. I agree.The Packers are decent without Brett and whatever team has Brett next season will be good. I also agree Don't get me wrong, I like Green Bay, but still prefer the Vikings As long as we got that out of the way.Dis football shtuff is srs bizness. Oh, nice sig by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorrow. Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 Chargers are Lightning either replace the QB with Rivers or remove the lightning. Thats it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.