Brushfire Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 You know, cutting stuff out of films that are based on other things- usually books, comics or games. Examples for me personally would be the Harry Potter flims- SO MUCH is cut out that it saddens me. They need to realise that most Harry Potter films WILL sit for 3 hours to watch the whole film. If I watched all of the LotR films, then I'd definitely watch Harry Potter were it that long. Discuss? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 They need to do Batman right. Heath Ledger was amazing, but I'm tired of people going and saying. "Hey, Joker is more like -insert why so serious-." That's not the damn Joker. D< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted January 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 They need to do Batman right. Heath Ledger was amazing' date=' but I'm tired of people going and saying. "Hey, Joker is more like -insert why so serious-." That's not the damn Joker. D<[/quote'] Well, while I'm inclined to agree in order to not be a hypocrite, I disagree. Sometimes, not being true to the original and putting other things in instead to be unique can be a good thing. An example is Batman, with the realism factor. But yeah, I can understand why you'd get annoyed with that. Heath Ledger's Joker was amazing, but anyone who says that it's the original Joker is an idiot. They need to know where to draw the line between movie and canon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 They need to do Batman right. Heath Ledger was amazing' date=' but I'm tired of people going and saying. "Hey, Joker is more like -insert why so serious-." That's not the damn Joker. D<[/quote'] Well, while I'm inclined to agree in order to not be a hypocrite, I disagree. Sometimes, not being true to the original and putting other things in instead to be unique can be a good thing. An example is Batman, with the realism factor. But yeah, I can understand why you'd get annoyed with that. Heath Ledger's Joker was amazing, but anyone who says that it's the original Joker is an idiot. They need to know where to draw the line between movie and canon. I can agree. I do like the nice realism they added in Batman. (Especially with what they did with Scarecrow) I just despise it when someone asks "What is Batman?" and they get pointed to the movies. The problem with most Super hero movies, is that they stray too far from the actual hero that they end up bad. (Look at pretty much every batman movie prior to begins.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.