Jump to content

New Mods


Twin Seed

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

[spoiler=And then there was light]

Yet it took you a week to lose your patience.

 

It took you 3 days to have your patience run on thin.

 

Contradicting yourself is never a good idea.

=/

 

I've just proved a point with Icy.

 

Yep.

You've proved that he's patient' date=' reasonable and compassionate.

*claps

 

You don't seem to have the time to warn the people who make cards that shouldn't be belonging in the section (ex. Divine Beasts).

 

Moderators don't need to warn people.

It is logical that you read the section rules before you post.

If your thread gets locked or your post gets reported, it's natural that you check the very same rules and see where you've made a mistake.

 

I agree with this thread' date=' most of the Mods ban people for no reason even though they do what the banned person does all the time. I support.

[/quote']

 

Sure, 'cause moderators are sadistic maniacs who don't have anything smarter to do than ban great and innocent members for no reason whatsoever.

 

I was thinking of a 'New Mod App' thread.

 

It exists.

It just has a hidden name.

 

 

 

Now, about the topic. I think that this whole thread is useless.

You're all forgetting one thing. Moderators are the ones in charge of this forum. They are most likely to notice first whether new moderators should be appointed. Our opinions are pretty much irrelevant at this point. Also, it is highly ridiculous and arrogant that some members are brave enough to criticize the moderators. They've been in your shoes, not contrariwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really all of us' date=' some. Me & Phantom Roxas were just critizing members.

[/quote']

 

I suppose I will get a verbal beating for saying this, but next time don't.

Just let it pass by, and pay it no attention.

Criticizing them will only make them do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned' date=' this thread is useless.

 

How often do you people want new mods? Is it just every time extremely inactive mods are replaced already?

 

Are you never satisfied?

[/quote']

This.

 

I don't even understand why this is being discussed. It's been made abundantly clear that the adminz and staffz pick the mods. They pick who they want, when they want. We don't have a say. Honestly, we don't really deserve this one. YCMaker bought the domain and created the site. We just chill here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be quite honest' date=' I've wanted to be a mod. But I think I like the current ones for right now. They always listen and they do the right thing, most of the time. Hey nobody is perfect.

 

Besides, YCMaker knows what he is doing.

[/quote']

 

I agree with this.

 

Except, I'd be better if he knew what he was doing and was on more than 1-2 times every half a year and actually did them, but...

 

Anyway, I suppose I support this, because having more active mods means things get moderated more. Which is a mod's job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amusing arguement is amusing. Anyways, to the point, continueing the arguement on Page 5:

 

Demoting inactive mods will not do anything. If they deserved to be mod once, they probably still do. Bloodrun is the only notable exception. Although people like TotalObelisk don't really look to return, in which case it might be a good idea to demote him, not that it'll actually do any difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...