God GAK Posted December 16, 2007 Report Share Posted December 16, 2007 It is OK. But i agree with Orochi. why the heck do you guys say that an easily counterable card should be limited or banned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonicDragon Posted December 16, 2007 Report Share Posted December 16, 2007 This card will destroy Monarchs, Sangan and D.D. decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted December 17, 2007 Report Share Posted December 17, 2007 This card will destroy Monarchs' date=' Sangan and D.D. decks.[/quote'] no freakin' way!!! really, who attacks with sangan??this card won't destroy raiza, granmarg or mobius, unless their player is n00b enough to fall on the trap... and that was a senseless comment, D.D. decks will LOVE this card when you use this against them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted December 17, 2007 Report Share Posted December 17, 2007 This card will destroy Monarchs' date=' Sangan and D.D. decks.[/quote'] no freakin' way!!! really, who attacks with sangan??this card won't destroy raiza, granmarg or mobius, unless their player is n00b enough to fall on the trap... and that was a senseless comment, D.D. decks will LOVE this card when you use this against them... I attack with sangan, extra damage, and you have the safety of knowing it will replace itself. It won't destroy monarchs AT ALL. Monarch gets RFG'd, no problem, you have another one in your hand to summon next turn with frog. Raiza can topdeck it. Honestly, cards that cannot be chained to a summon, EXCEPT mirror force should not be decked outside of gadgets. (Mirror force, Call, Torrential, transmigration, dustshoot [possibly mind crush in combo with], phoenix wing wind blast, and cards that are needed for the specific deck type [this card in gadgets and DD for the most part] are acceptable, most other traps are not useful, less you show me some new meta card) I think it is fairly obvious what happens when a DD deck gets RFG'd..... Outside of JFF (just for fun), gadgets, and DD decks bad enough to use Sak, widespread, or bottomless, This card really shouldn't be decked. Plus. One can side in RFTDD (return from DD, and note, most people don't side RFTDD) and this card becomes needless, use 3, and they could RFTDD for game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethercide Posted December 17, 2007 Report Share Posted December 17, 2007 It sure will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 and your arguments are...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 and your arguments are...? The assumption that people don't attack with Sangan. :O. And the fact that they do. The rest I'm not arguing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 i attack with sangan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 and your arguments are...? The assumption that people don't attack with Sangan. :O. And the fact that they do. The rest I'm not arguing. i meant legacy hero... also, i attack with sangan too, only when i know that i can attack and my opponent won't respond... only newbies waste sakuretsu/mirror/waboku on a sangan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethercide Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 Yes, attacking with Sangan is a good thing, he doesn't have much ATK, which makes Magic Cylinder and Draining Shield, and if he is destroyed, he can be easily replaced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 also' date=' i attack with sangan too, only when i know that i can attack and my opponent won't respond... only newbies waste sakuretsu/mirror/waboku on a sangan...[/quote'] it doesnt matter if they have saku/mirror force, sangan replaces himself. Yes' date=' attacking with Sangan is a good thing, he doesn't have much ATK, which makes Magic Cylinder and Draining Shield, and if he is destroyed, he can be easily replaced. [/quote'] first of all, nobody should ever deck Cylinder. second of all, dont deck Draining Shield either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutsman500 Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 is there gunna be a limit on this card, i wanna have 3 of em. =D for my chaos fiend deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethercide Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 OK. I guess... Still, this card could replace Sakuretsu Armor, because unless you use it against a D.D. deck it is more useful than Sakuretsu Armor. Let's put it this way, My opponent has a BEUD and I have the two cards face down (S. armor and the new one) If he attacks with BEUD and I use Sakuretsu , he cam use Re-Fusion. But, if I remove it from play, there's no way he will be back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 OK. I guess... Still' date=' this card could replace Sakuretsu Armor, because unless you use it against a D.D. deck it is more useful than Sakuretsu Armor. Let's put it this way, My opponent has a BEUD and I have the two cards face down (S. armor and the new one) If he attacks with BEUD and I use Sakuretsu , he cam use Re-Fusion. But, [b']if I remove it from play, there's no way he will be back.[/b] Just for arguments sake. Return from the Different Dimension. Nuff Said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted December 19, 2007 Report Share Posted December 19, 2007 also' date=' i attack with sangan too, only when i know that i can attack and my opponent won't respond... only newbies waste sakuretsu/mirror/waboku on a sangan...[/quote'] it doesnt matter if they have saku/mirror force, sangan replaces himself. Yes' date=' attacking with Sangan is a good thing, he doesn't have much ATK, which makes Magic Cylinder and Draining Shield, and if he is destroyed, he can be easily replaced. [/quote'] first of all, nobody should ever deck Cylinder. second of all, dont deck Draining Shield either.cylinder is a nice card for burn/stall i really hate when their like "unless ur a stupid played and walk into a trap card". <.< hello are u untrappible i dont think so. even the best players will walk into a trap. u cant always mst or heavy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tefached Posted December 19, 2007 Report Share Posted December 19, 2007 I dont think it will replace the armor card that much cuz if you have a card to bring back that monster then why remove it from play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted December 19, 2007 Report Share Posted December 19, 2007 cylinder is a nice card for burn/stall i really hate when their like "unless ur a stupid played and walk into a trap card". <.< hello are u untrappible i dont think so. even the best players will walk into a trap. u cant always mst or heavy. yeah, sure... 2 or 3 times, no more... you can fall into the trap, but when the trap reports minority damage, for example monarch decks can fall into sakuretsu because they always will have another monarch, another way to summon it and a card to reover them, like pot of avarice... also, if you said that you like cylinder... hello!! you're more confident than me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.