The Fake Type Rebellion

[Alexis Rhodes]

I didnt even know he was demoted

[DL]

I only found out a few days ago.

 

Wow, we're more active to day than we've ever been.

[Kotaro]

So your all posting apps in our enemy's club. Or am I missing the point here?

[Alexis Rhodes]

So your all posting apps in our enemy's club. Or am I missing the point here?

 

That kinda what where doing yep

I only found out a few days ago.

 

Wow' date=' we're more active to day than we've ever been.

[/quote']

 

What do you mean ?

 

I've posted more in a day before

[Pikachu]

So advanced members can't accept people?

 

I just wanna be high enough on the ladder to accept people.

 

 

Oh well' date=' you're the boss, Pikachu-sama.

[/quote']

 

Yes, I am the boss. And yes, advanced people can't accept.

 

And a debating club? Huh...

[DL]

@Kotaro - I'm there to debate AGAINST fake types.

 

@Pikachu - meh, forget it then. I'll stick with normal member

[Admiral Tim]

is this closed then?

[Nexev]

So your all posting apps in our enemy's club. Or am I missing the point here?

 

Okay, see, I decided to be fair and allow the club to hold two groups.

 

One is the normal one, the pro fake types.

 

The second is the dragon eaters, basically the anti fake types.

 

Your welcome to join the dragon eaters if you want.

 

That way you can tell us specifically what's wrong with whatever fake type we suggest.

 

Then we try to improve it.

 

@DL: Then your a dragon eater.

[DL]

I dun eat Draguns O_o

 

Oh well, I suppsoe Ic an.

 

BTW, I'd rather do both debating again=st and for Fake types.

 

Simply because debating is fun.

[Pikachu]

So your all posting apps in our enemy's club. Or am I missing the point here?

 

Okay' date=' see, I decided to be fair and allow the club to hold two groups.

 

One is the normal one, the pro fake types.

 

The second is the dragon eaters, basically the anti fake types.

 

Your welcome to join the dragon eaters if you want.

 

That way you can tell us specifically what's wrong with whatever fake type we suggest.

 

[b']Then we try to improve it.[/b]

 

@DL: Then your a dragon eater.

 

Oh, what irony. Improve your fake types?

 

I like your secretive way of club managing, but I can see through it.

[Nexev]

There is no irony in improving a fake type before it came out.

 

Even though real types people have double standards.

 

Inventor is dumb but Sea-Serpent is a unique and balanced type?

[Pikachu]

There is no irony in improving a fake type before it came out.

 

Even though real types people have double standards.

 

Inventor is dumb but Sea-Serpent is a unique and balanced type?

 

No, it's ironic that we're debating against fake types but in reality we're actually helping you improve it.

[Nexev]

If you point whats wrong with a fake type we edit it accordingly.

 

Eventually one of us will say "Whatever" and the type goes through or is dropped entirely.

 

Plus how is it secretive if I post it?

 

That's like me twittering top secret plans. >.>

[DL]

Which, according to Deus, Creator has done.

 

Anyway, if we provicde enough reasons why the type is bad, it can be shut down. MUAHAH!

[Nexev]

It had to be ALLOT though, because as I constantly state. REal types overlap.

 

Thus all we need to do is make it not directly overlap obviously.

[DL]

Yep.

 

Just like there's a lot of reason animal isn't a type.

 

 

But something like Puppet would be acceptable.

[Sploda]

There is no irony in improving a fake type before it came out.

 

Even though real types people have double standards.

 

Inventor is dumb but Sea-Serpent is a unique and balanced type?

 

I'm sorry I don't believe that you have room to talk, as I've yet to see you produce a Fake-type that works.

[DL]

He's being rethorical.

 

As in "WHY would Invetor be classified as dumb, when Sea Serpent is perfectly acceptable?"

[Pikachu]

Darklink, your sig is big as hell. SERIOUSLY.

 

What are you smoking?

[Nexev]

There is no irony in improving a fake type before it came out.

 

Even though real types people have double standards.

 

Inventor is dumb but Sea-Serpent is a unique and balanced type?

 

I'm sorry I don't believe that you have room to talk' date=' as I've yet to see you produce a Fake-type that works.

[/quote']

 

I can't even make a card, I had an idea for a set involving monsters who don't exist but unexist (meaning they are composed of nothing and if they battle a living monster then they cancel each other out) but Unlife sounded more like a subtype.

 

And also, sarcasm, genius.

 

Why would I think Sea-Sepents are balanced.

 

They are not snakes because there in water and not fish because they are snakes. THerefore they are sea-sepents!

 

By that logic Flying-Dog is a legitimate fake type.

 

@DL: We all know pokemon would win anyway. Afer all, they have Rayquaza and pokemon that control the very elements. Couldn't Rayquaza use his sky powers to get rid of oxygen?

[DL]

I loled, Nexev... flying-dog... XD

 

 

Also... not even the god in a pokeball can beat a hologram that can bring people to their knees writhing in pain and agony.

[Sploda]

@Nexev

It's on a computer, I can't tell if it's sarcasm unless you say so.

 

@DL

Yet the pain caused by Pokemon is real.

[DL]

He had the question mark.

 

it was obvious to ME, at least.

 

 

 

Also, if unreal pain can bring someone into near-orgasm status, I say it's pretty darn awesome.