Nexev Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 Sorry, I am here for reasons unknown to me, all I seem to be able to do is comment on things. However I digress onto more practical matters. Pikachu, I must express confusion here. I am perplexed as how you are interpereting my comments. Of said comments I should apologize, I was upset and thinking about it made me feel slightly sick. Thus I was irritable and reacted rather harshly. What I meant to state is as of now the knights are in a compromising position, attacking them now is nothing more than kicking someone while down. It's nothing to brag about. More importantly, Icy has informed us awhile ago that technically you CAN use fake types in realistic. That is a very real problem, how can any group get rid of fake types if you can make them in Realistic? I suggest this: We need to PM Roxas and tell him that this is not a good thing, give a reasonable argument. Roxas moderates CC section so if he follows your policy it will be easier to get rid of Fake types. Then you try to convince ICy, who I have reason to believe pretty much controls all of the CC section. I doubt we can convince him to ban all of Fake Types, however you may be able to get them out of realistic. Doing so would be a major victory, though it is a victory not many knights would truly against. Such a victory is surely greater than the destruction of the Knights. This was what I was trying to say, not a threat or a challenge of any type. I merely wished to contribute to this club the best I can as a member. Back from school by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 That's actually quite good. Or at least prohibit any type that can easily fit under any other type. Such as animal, and bird. Ninja, etc. I wouldn't mind so much seeing well-thought out types (inventors, hermits, mad puppets, etc) Compromising with mods is always good. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted February 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Sorry' date=' I am here for reasons unknown to me, all I seem to be able to do is comment on things. However I digress onto more practical matters. Pikachu, I must express confusion here. I am perplexed as how you are interpereting my comments. Of said comments I should apologize, I was upset and thinking about it made me feel slightly sick. Thus I was irritable and reacted rather harshly. What I meant to state is as of now the knights are in a compromising position, attacking them now is nothing more than kicking someone while down. It's nothing to brag about. More importantly, Icy has informed us awhile ago that technically you CAN use fake types in realistic. That is a very real problem, how can any group get rid of fake types if you can make them in Realistic? I suggest this: We need to PM Roxas and tell him that this is not a good thing, give a reasonable argument. Roxas moderates CC section so if he follows your policy it will be easier to get rid of Fake types. Then you try to convince ICy, who I have reason to believe pretty much controls all of the CC section. I doubt we can convince him to ban all of Fake Types, however you may be able to get them out of realistic. Doing so would be a major victory, though it is a victory not many knights would truly against. Such a victory is surely greater than the destruction of the Knights. This was what I was trying to say, not a threat or a challenge of any type. I merely wished to contribute to this club the best I can as a member. Back from school by the way.[/quote'] So tell me again...why are you helping me? But, I understand where you're coming from now, and thanks for the tips. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Well I am kinda a member of this club? Maybe? As a member I feel it is my duty to do whatever I can to aid you. Just as long as both clubs survive and are working, I'm okay. I shall do whatever I can for both clubs besides a direct confrontation between them. In such an event I must merely stand down and help the loser get back on it's feet. As a knight I only care that if a card is made it will be graded on quality and not by it's type. As a rebel I desire to contain Fake Types. Somehow I believe that if Fake Types are in a area were they can flourish but are still contained it will be less hated. So I found a win-win in a contradicting theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoDemonX Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Pikachu why haven't you put me on the member list yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krillin! Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Q: Is a horrible card with with bad OCG Background pic and effect, better than a faketype with wonderful OCG background pic and effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Yes. By a long shot. If that occurrence was common however than fake types would be far less hated. The problem is that noobs love using fake types and that has stained whatever name the fake types would have had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krillin! Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 I mean noobs think that the point of this website is not to be realistic, one of them told me themselves thats its not supposed to be.Blasphemy!It's like they never saw a card in their lives! Why join YCM if your gonna make it bad?!No offense to noobs out there who think using fake types (ie. in Naruto someone called sasuke Ninja/Missing-Nin/Curse Ninja/Effect) to explain the card is cool. 1 faketype is bad enough but 3 in one card is just bad bad bad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelda Hero 1 Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 OK, it's been a while since I've been on 1) I think that the FTR did actually help defeat the FTK because without this club many of the people who left, would never have left if there wasn't a club to transfer to 2) Now that we have enough members, lets make a club contest where the five or three best will become the three or five that will compete in the 5v5s 3) Even though I don't like Fake-Types, I still prefer cards with good OCG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Tim Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 lol i lost internet connection for a few days and our enemy was utterly demolished? again? this is epic, let's celebrate! nexev i'm banning you cause your getting a bit rude and spammy. ask me nicely later and maybe you can rejoin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted February 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Well I am kinda a member of this club? Maybe? As a member I feel it is my duty to do whatever I can to aid you. Just as long as both clubs survive and are working' date=' I'm okay. I shall do whatever I can for both clubs besides a direct confrontation between them. In such an event I must merely stand down and help the loser get back on it's feet. As a knight I only care that if a card is made it will be graded on quality and not by it's type. As a rebel I desire to contain Fake Types. Somehow I believe that if Fake Types are in a area were they can flourish but are still contained it will be less hated. So I found a win-win in a contradicting theory.[/quote'] That's what we both want, eh? Why can't we ever ally, eh? Your mission statement always changes...and the current one makes me want to team up with you and make a proposal to the moderators...but I doubt your buddies would accept. Pikachu why haven't you put me on the member list yet. WHOOPS. I will now. ;D lol i lost internet connection for a few days and our enemy was utterly demolished? again? this is epic' date=' let's celebrate! nexev i'm banning you cause your getting a bit rude and spammy. ask me nicely later and maybe you can rejoin.[/quote'] You finally came back! And why the ban? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Pikachan, you need to update the member list more often... So then everyone that hasn't been on knows I'm a member coughmilkchanwho'sbeengoneforevercough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoDemonX Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Thank you Pikachu now I can act like a real member in this club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 and of course, I'm still not in the list... -_- Anyway, The FTK seem to be going through position changes. and focuisng on humanoid-type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightning Bagon Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Screw the FTR I gotz the FK (But I'm still with you to destroy the remake FTK) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Tim Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 haha, a glitch. it seems you do not know the endless capability of hacks! but i might... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krillin! Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 What are you planning to do to the FTK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted February 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Screw the FTR I gotz the FK (But I'm still with you to destroy the remake FTK) You...why brother? WHY? *cries* Uh anyways...I have an 1 on 1 with Kailyn...I have no idea what the rules should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoDemonX Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 the rules should be the loser have to give the winner 2000 points and can not post for one day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted February 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 the rules should be the loser have to give the winner 2000 points and can not post for one day. No, as in, card requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelda Hero 1 Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 the rules should be the loser have to give the winner 2000 points and can not post for one day. No' date=' as in, card requirements.[/quote'] I personally love doing 1 on 1s where the only requirement is to create a card that changes the rules, those are my favorites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoDemonX Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 the rules should be the loser have to give the winner 2000 points and can not post for one day. No' date=' as in, card requirements.[/quote'] ok the effect have to do with Light monster and Life Points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted February 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 'Have to do with'. Ok. Life Points? I'll consider that. You know, I'm a bit busy recently, so whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Tim Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 so what's on the go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 the rules should be the loser have to give the winner 2000 points and can not post for one day. that would be suicidal against kailyn. She's the best card maker in the FTK. trust me. I know.I also got challenged by her, but turned it down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.