Top 10 Games Of All Time

[problematica]

A top 10 ranking that has individual ports of games is absolutely retarded. It's the same damn game, it doesn't even make sense for one port to be considered better than so and so games while the other port is worse then those same games.

The idea of using scores as well is retarded since nearly no reviewing site goes on a 100.00% scale and there are far too many games older games that are not reviewed by most sites because they are too old to bother rating.

And having Orange Box in a top 10 game list is retarded, it's 3 seperate games (Since HL2: Eps 1 & 2 are expansions).

 

I really prefer GameInformer's top 10 (first 10 in their Top 100 list). It takes pretty good account of the games innovations, importance to later games, and how they would be viewed at the time of their release.

 

And this thread reeks of weeaboos.

[Hydra of Ages]

And this thread reeks of weeaboos.

 

I've only seen one person complaining about the lack of Final Fantasy so far' date=' nobody's mentioned Guilty Gear, and the word 'Kawaii' has yet to be uttered. I see nothing wrong here.

 

Anyway, the list is... meh. Personally, I think Ocarina is overrated- an awesome, mindblowing game (especially for the era) yes, but it's not the pinnacle of video gamin excellence that you'd see practically every list make it out to be. Plus, everyone knows that professional ratings are proportionally higher for franchises with [i']bribe money[/i] -Err, massive fanbases in the area. After all, what media outlet would give, say, Halo3 a bad score if they knew a lot of their readers love anything halo and would be upset about it if they gave it poor markings?

 

My personal list?

 

1. Super Mario Bros. 3

2. The Legend of Zelda; A Link to the Past

3. Okami

4. Shadow of the Colossus

5. Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney: Trials and Tribulations

6. Portal

7. Final Fantasy IV

8. Mother 3 (Provided you've got a translation handy...)

9. The Elder Scrolls: Morrowind

10. Metal Gear Solid

 

...But that's just personal, unwashed, unprofessional take on it, using absolutely nothing from the past year or so.

[Aero~]

These are the top ten best games of all time from gamerankings.com. They take reviews and average out scores to get their total percentage of how good it is. See in which areas you agree w/ and dont agree w/.

 

# [Name] [score] [system]

 

1. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time 97.66% (N64) yes

2. Grand Theft Auto IV 97.31% (PS3) crap no

3. Super Mario Galaxy 97.30% (Wii) no

4. Super Mario World 96.70% (SNES)no

5. Grand Theft Auto IV 96.31% (X360)no

6. Metroid Prime 96.26% (GCN)meh

7. Soul Caliber 96.26% (DC)no

8. The Orange Box 96.26% (X360)no

9. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves 96.19% (PS3)no

10. Super Metroid 96.00% (SNES)no

 

For more go to http://www.gamerankings.com

 

replace no's with Zelda, FF, and KH titles.

[TAG]

A top 10 ranking that has individual ports of games is absolutely retarded. It's the same damn game' date=' it doesn't even make sense for one port to be considered better than so and so games while the other port is worse then those same games.

The idea of using scores as well is retarded since nearly no reviewing site goes on a 100.00% scale and there are far too many games older games that are not reviewed by most sites because they are too old to bother rating.

And having Orange Box in a top 10 game list is retarded, it's 3 seperate games (Since HL2: Eps 1 & 2 are expansions).

 

I really prefer GameInformer's top 10 (first 10 in their Top 100 list). It takes pretty good account of the games innovations, importance to later games, and how they would be viewed at the time of their release.

 

And this thread reeks of weeaboos.

[/quote']

 

1) Please don't tell me you're trying to say that all versions of a game are considered equal.

2) I understand that 2 versions of a game shouldn't be on a top 10 list, but see, that's not a top 10 list. That's just listing the highest rated games. So you can have different versions of the same game on it if one version is genuinely better than another.

3) Again, it's not a top 10 list. It's just showing the 10-highest rated games. So Orange Box CAN be there.

4) You don't mean that Top 200 list where GTA4 is ranked one place above Super Mario World, do you? Because if you do, I pay absolutely 0 attention to that list.

5) No, it doesn't reek of weeaboos.

[Cyber Altair]

lol KH titles.

[Skuldur]

lol KH titles.

 

I know.

 

They're good but they're not even close to Top 10.

[Cyber Altair]

Not even top 50.

[guy22]

why dont you make the list the top 20? see what else comes up.

['tyleR]

I prefer most of Brushfire's list. :/ Where the hell is Majora's Mask? Also, get rid of the Orange Box and make it Half-Life 2 solely. I found that game kickass.

[Cyber Altair]

Orange Box is the best deal ever.

['tyleR]

Orange Box is the best deal ever.

 

I find $20 for three games a pretty good deal' date=' too. ;P Portal was a good game, surprisingly. It had some lulz, as well.

 

 

 

The Cake is a Lie......

[problematica]

A top 10 ranking that has individual ports of games is absolutely retarded. It's the same damn game' date=' it doesn't even make sense for one port to be considered better than so and so games while the other port is worse then those same games.

The idea of using scores as well is retarded since nearly no reviewing site goes on a 100.00% scale and there are far too many games older games that are not reviewed by most sites because they are too old to bother rating.

And having Orange Box in a top 10 game list is retarded, it's 3 seperate games (Since HL2: Eps 1 & 2 are expansions).

 

I really prefer GameInformer's top 10 (first 10 in their Top 100 list). It takes pretty good account of the games innovations, importance to later games, and how they would be viewed at the time of their release.

 

And this thread reeks of weeaboos.

[/quote']

 

1) Please don't tell me you're trying to say that all versions of a game are considered equal.

2) I understand that 2 versions of a game shouldn't be on a top 10 list, but see, that's not a top 10 list. That's just listing the highest rated games. So you can have different versions of the same game on it if one version is genuinely better than another.

3) Again, it's not a top 10 list. It's just showing the 10-highest rated games. So Orange Box CAN be there.

4) You don't mean that Top 200 list where GTA4 is ranked one place above Super Mario World, do you? Because if you do, I pay absolutely 0 attention to that list.

5) No, it doesn't reek of weeaboos.

 

1) No, not all ports are the same, but it's the same game there is no real substantial way that they are different.

2) Which is then completely pointless in even considering it a top 10 list as it being considered in this thread, not merely as what is the highest rated.

3) It's still 3 individual games, Orange Box is just a collection of them. Grouping them together in rating would mean that the faults and positives of each game determines how all 3 are considered.

4) I don't agree for the most part with the list, but the top 10 of that list is pretty well done.

5) People are obsessing over Japanese games, refusing to acknowledge the quality outside of something from Japan.

[~Emo~]

Needs more Final Fantasy.

 

Final fantasy is not that great of a franchise imo.

 

 

 

DOOM is not on here, why would you not include the first FPS ever!?!

[problematica]

Needs more Final Fantasy.

 

Final fantasy is not that great of a franchise imo.

 

 

 

DOOM is not on here' date=' why would you not include the first FPS ever!?!

[/quote']

 

Actually, there were some before Doom, like Wolfenstein 3D; just Doom is probably the most influential.

[Poc]

Wolf3D was the first FPS, although Doom was the first commercially successful FPS.

[Flame Dragon]

I love how half of the best reviewed games of all time are Nintendo games.

 

lol opinions.

 

Lock