Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Lawl, Painful Choice for Hopeless Dragon. (Yes, I am butthurt that I lost to recently) Discuss! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 I love this card. So helpful for so many cards...Remember when Chimertech OTK was the shiz? Except those decks used Overload Fusion. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Great in Ab0 decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Great. But is it bannable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 I would think so. You can shrink your deck to almost no end to get out what could be an extremely powerful monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 This card can abuse Chimertech. If we get to a Fusion Monster that can absue this card liek crazy then we can ban it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Giant Trunade + Future Fusion = Absolute Zero Spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Great. But is it bannable? No, but I wouldn't be surprised if Crab made a topic claiming it was... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Giant Trunade + Future Fusion = Absolute Zero Spam. Win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Whether or not you ban this depends on how you handle several other cards. It's difficult to discuss Future Fusion alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 I do admit, someone dumping there entire monster card pool for Chimeratech is pretty lolz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Unless I'm missing something major it's fine at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Unless I'm missing something major it's fine at 1. What makes it fine at 1 but not at 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Unless I'm missing something major it's fine at 1. What makes it fine at 1 but not at 3? Because at 3 it becomes far to abusable with chimeratech and others... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Unless I'm missing something major it's fine at 1. What makes it fine at 1 but not at 3? Because at 3 it becomes far to abusable with chimeratech and others... It it's unacceptable when it is used, then it is just as unacceptable at 1 as it is at 3. Also, why are you keeping Chimeratech Overdragon legal in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Unless I'm missing something major it's fine at 1. What makes it fine at 1 but not at 3? Because at 3 it becomes far to abusable with chimeratech and others... It it's unacceptable when it is used' date=' then it is just as unacceptable at 1 as it is at 3. Also, why are you keeping Chimeratech Overdragon legal in the first place?[/quote'] Not to be offensive in any way but do people magical draw what they want from the deck now a days or is it still based on chance, IE having 3 of something in a deck gives that person a better chance of drawing it then if they only had one? Also the reason why I kept Overdragon legal was because I thought we were talking about future fusion and it's place on the banlist. Overall my argument is invalid because your Crab Helmet... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Unless I'm missing something major it's fine at 1. What makes it fine at 1 but not at 3? Because at 3 it becomes far to abusable with chimeratech and others... It it's unacceptable when it is used' date=' then it is just as unacceptable at 1 as it is at 3. Also, why are you keeping Chimeratech Overdragon legal in the first place?[/quote'] Not to be offensive in any way but do people magical draw what they want from the deck now a days or is it still based on chance, IE having 3 of something in a deck gives that person a better chance of drawing it then if they only had one? If drawing Future Fusion is itself a problem, then Future Fusion must be banned so that this problem cannot arise. If drawing Future Fusion is not itself a problem, then why should Future Fusion not be at 3? Replacing "Future Fusion" in the above two sentences with the name of just about any card provides a good summary of the fundamental logic of 3/0 theory. The question "If not 0, why not 3?" has legitimate answers for only a few cards. Also the reason why I kept Overdragon legal was because I thought we were talking about future fusion and it's place on the banlist. Having strong interactions with a broken card does not imply banworthiness. One would hardly ban Dark Grepher on the grounds that it is too strong when used with Dark Armed Dragon. Overall my argument is invalid because your Crab Helmet... I love it when people do this. IF I AM WRONG IT DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE EVERYONE JUST THINKS YOU'RE RIGHT BECAUSE YOU'RE CRAB HELMET SO I'M SECRETLY RIGHT DERP DERP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Unless I'm missing something major it's fine at 1. What makes it fine at 1 but not at 3? Because at 3 it becomes far to abusable with chimeratech and others... It it's unacceptable when it is used' date=' then it is just as unacceptable at 1 as it is at 3. Also, why are you keeping Chimeratech Overdragon legal in the first place?[/quote'] Not to be offensive in any way but do people magical draw what they want from the deck now a days or is it still based on chance, IE having 3 of something in a deck gives that person a better chance of drawing it then if they only had one? If drawing Future Fusion is itself a problem, then Future Fusion must be banned so that this problem cannot arise. If drawing Future Fusion is not itself a problem, then why should Future Fusion not be at 3? Replacing "Future Fusion" in the above two sentences with the name of just about any card provides a good summary of the fundamental logic of 3/0 theory. The question "If not 0, why not 3?" has legitimate answers for only a few cards. Also the reason why I kept Overdragon legal was because I thought we were talking about future fusion and it's place on the banlist. Having strong interactions with a broken card does not imply banworthiness. One would hardly ban Dark Grepher on the grounds that it is too strong when used with Dark Armed Dragon. Overall my argument is invalid because your Crab Helmet... I love it when people do this. IF I AM WRONG IT DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE EVERYONE JUST THINKS YOU'RE RIGHT BECAUSE YOU'RE CRAB HELMET SO I'M SECRETLY RIGHT DERP DERP. Actualy I'm mostly on the fence on the whole 3 and 0 thing and I just had those issues with it, the reason I said my argument was invalid was not becuase you have respect but because your an intelligent person and inevitably would find the flaw in my logic, although it wasn't very difficult I assume. Honestly I should have rephrased my last few posts as questions rather then disgusting accusations... When I actualy look at myself I a see I am a noob and thus should have treated a more experienced player with respect and thus apologize for not doing so and wasting everyone's time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Ban FGD and Chimy and put this at 3.I will love using this and The Shining to dump Malicious and Wulf. EDIT: Curses! I just checked and The Shining is not like A-Zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 this card is fine at 3 with overload at 0, as it still results in the same outcome, and it cant really abuse anything else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 this card is fine at 3 with overload at 0' date=' as it still results in the same outcome, and it cant really abuse anything else[/quote'] Aside from Overdragon, there isn't a single broken target for Overload. Why attack that instead of Overdragon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 this card is fine at 3 with overload at 0' date=' as it still results in the same outcome, and it cant really abuse anything else[/quote'] If you ban Overload, why don't you ban Miracle Fusion, Dragon's Mirror and Dark Calling? When they all basically do the same thing except summon different beatsticks. Its the Fusion MONSTERS, such as Chimeratech that is the problem, not the card that summons it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 this card is fine at 3 with overload at 0' date=' as it still results in the same outcome, and it cant really abuse anything else[/quote'] If you ban Overload, why don't you ban Miracle Fusion, Dragon's Mirror and Dark Calling? When they all basically do the same thing except summon different beatsticks. Its the Fusion MONSTERS, such as Chimeratech that is the problem, not the card that summons it 100% Agree. You can't take out a card because it makes an archtype slightly higher in tier. Thats just being ignorent and rude. Touche to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blakie Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Good card. But too slow for my taste. All I'd need to stop Chimeratech from coming is MST or Heavy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Good card. But too slow for my taste. All I'd need to stop Chimeratech from coming is MST or Heavy. Read Chimeratech, read Future, rinse and repeat until you understand why it's stupid to bother killing Future Fusion if Chimeratech's declared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.