Yu-gi-oh Dude Posted December 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Yep 1 to you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Make Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 #6. Is it the desert? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inteligent12 Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Riddle 6: 1 man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 riddle 6: no human being died. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yu-gi-oh Dude Posted December 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Nope. Think harder. Even read it again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 I know! Both men are dead (because they starved to death in the desert) and the man that ate one of them (who's a 3rd different person) ate a corpse, so there's still no murderer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yu-gi-oh Dude Posted December 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 No. 1 man ate the other. Definatly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Legend Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 No murderer, one man died then the other lived and he ate the dead man. If not its the desert. If not it was on tv >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 'KWLegend said: No murderer' date=' one man died then the other lived and he ate the dead man. If not its the desert. If not it was on tv >_>[/quote'] That's what I said... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lover Bat Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 the man who was eaten was already dead because of the desert but the desert isn't a person so no one is the murderer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twig Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Here's my weird guess: The guy who ate the man was named No One and he's the only one that heared the incident. So...No One is the murderer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 ..... There was no murderer because no one even knew about the incident in the first place, so they couldn't classify either of the men as the murderer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yu-gi-oh Dude Posted December 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 No. You'll be kicking yourselves when you find out the answer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Legend Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Who was the murderer?It was Who? (Ime very desperate for a 75 rep >_>) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yu-gi-oh Dude Posted December 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 No. It is SO EASY! Just read it carefully and you might learn something... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 I know, I know! The answer is "No." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cypress Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 was it you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yu-gi-oh Dude Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Thank you! Can you explain why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 The question asks whether if mister Who is the murderer or not. As Who is a very rare name, I simply supposed that neither of the 2 men in the desert are named Who. Going down the same logic, we can assume that the name of the murderer is "They", and the name of the killed man is not important and neither requested. So, yet again, the answer to the 6th riddle is "No.". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yu-gi-oh Dude Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Wrong! (I was talking to Cypress, Mindscatter!)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Ow, now I get it! If no one had heard about the incident, then you would be the only one who would know about it, so you are the murderer! Nice logic, Cypress. I bow down before your intellect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yu-gi-oh Dude Posted December 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Im not sure who gets the rep. I think Cypress gets it cos she suggested it first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 I guess. Care posting some new riddles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yu-gi-oh Dude Posted December 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Meh. Ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Riddle 7: There wasn't a single person BECAUSE the boat was full of people. Usually, "full" describes a number greater than 5, and "single person" really means "single person". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.