Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 I've heard this term go around a lot, and I've heard a few different explinations: 1) Hopeless focused on field control2) Hopeless varient focused on LaDD3) An old, or original, name for Hopeless4) None of the above So what is it YCM-kun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rose Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 I think it's 1). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Disaster_Dragon I like it more than Hopeless TBH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rose Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Acording to the Lolwiki you should play burst breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Looks like significantly more fail compared to Hopeless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technicolour Genocide Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 If only Dragons could toolbox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Basically you use Drago, Prime, and exploder to shut down your opponent's strategies. I have a guy who plays this at locals and it's about even with my GBs in wins. Even with Burst Breath, it can hit more often than not, being chainable. IDK. It LOOKS like fail, but it seems to be pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 I have a guy who plays this at locals and it's about even with my GBs in wins. Not to sound all that rude or w/e, but I was fairly certain Glads were pretty awful this format, so you telling me that it's on par with your Gladiator Beast deck isn't like... all that informative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathxy Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 at my locals there is someone who plays this with 2 LaDD and is very good my hopeless is 2-2 with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Looks like significantly more fail compared to Hopeless. This is way better than Hopeless Dragon. >.< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted December 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 I assume Disaster Dragon trades speed for consistency? From what I've heard, that's the trade off. Hopeless can OTK like no tomorrow, but consistency is it's flaw. Disaster Dragon, from what I've heard, is a more consistent control build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Looks like significantly more fail compared to Hopeless. This is way better than Hopeless Dragon. >.< Eh, I'm saying what it LOOKS like, to me, personally. <_< It looks like a random fail pile "Dragon Deck" from 2007, with 3 REDMD splashed into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Nothx.l'm sticking with hopeless. This deck is too easily run over. Control my ass. lt's terrible compared to the former.Nothx.l'm sticking with hopeless. This deck is too easily run over. Control my ass. lt's terrible compared to the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 I have a guy who plays this at locals and it's about even with my GBs in wins. Not to sound all that rude or w/e' date=' but I was fairly certain Glads were pretty awful this format, so you telling me that it's on par with your Gladiator Beast deck isn't like... all that informative.[/quote'] Both disaster dragon and plain hopeless are also bad this format. And GBs are still way more likely to top 16 than either of them. GBs are the top of tier two, so for a not-so-competitive deck to be near them is a pretty good sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 PH, sorry but this isn't exactly spam... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.