Mysterium Tremendum Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 - Make a Dragon-Type monster- First to get 5 votes or whoever has most votes 3 days after I say Voting begins.- Winner gets 2 reps- Almost forgot, follow all regular YCM rules.- Votes MUST HAVE 2 reasons or they will not be counted.- First to post their card will be my opponent. My Card[spoiler=Card Effect]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by removing from play 1 "Polymerization" in your hand, and Tributing 1 Level 7 or higher Dragon-Type monster that you control from your field. When this card is Special Summoned successfully, select 1 Fusion Monster in your opponent's Extra Deck. This card's ATK and DEF becomes equal to the ATK and DEF of the selected Fusion Monster. If there are no Fusion Monsters in your opponent's Extra Deck, this card's ATK and DEF automatically become 2500. As long as you control this face-up card your opponent cannot Summon the selected Fusion monster. By removing 1 Fusion monster in your Extra Deck from play during your Standby Phase, you can destroy 1 face-up monster your opponent controls whose Level Stars are equal to or lower than the removed Fusion Monster's. During the turn this effect is activated, skip your Battle Phase. When this card is destroyed or removed from play, your opponent can Special Summon the selected Fusion monster from their Extra Deck. This is counted as a Fusion Summon. Sorry I kinda got carried away on the effect Xion 27's Card[spoiler=Card Effect]This card cannot be normal summoned or set. This card can only be special summoned by removing 3 FIRE monsters in your graveyard from play. You must also tribute 3 monsters you control and destroy 5 spell or trap cards you control. The controller of this card takes 1000 damage during each of his/her standby phases. Destroy this card 3 turns after it was special summoned and destroy 3 cards on your side of the field if possble. This card can only be destroyed by the effect of "raging izard". This card can attack all monsters on your opponent's side of the field, one time each. If it does, you cannot attack with other monsters you control this turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 can I reserve? If I can, I do. Card coming up. CARD IN: This card cannot be normal summoned or set. This card can only be special summoned by removing 3 FIRE monsters in your graveyard from play. You must also tribute 3 monsters you control and destroy 5 spell or trap cards you control. The controller of this card takes 1000 damage during each of his/her standby phases. Destroy this card 3 turns after it was special summoned and destroy 3 cards on your side of the field if possble. This card can only be destroyed by the effect of "raging izard". This card can attack all monsters on your opponent's side of the field, one time each. If it does, you cannot attack with other monsters you control this turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysterium Tremendum Posted December 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 yeah you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysterium Tremendum Posted December 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Ok, Voting begins now!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Omg.... LOLYCM! We all know who is going to win.Vote to Crisis King. Card has good OCG, clean effect, good drawback, and sufficient movement within almost any Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Wow, this makes me sad. I can tell you why you both lose... 1. I discard a "Polymerization" (A card that, if I had ANY sense, I would KNOW not to use), and Tribute a lvl 7 or higher Dragon-Type monster (probably a monster with more effectiveness than this guy), to summon a monster that, in the meta, will PROBABLY have 2500 ATK/DEF (bad) and no effect on my opponent's Fusion Cards whatsoever. The only advantage I get is a once/turn -1 to my opponent in exchange for sending a card to the Graveyard (which is nice) and NOT BEING ABLE TO ATTACK.... terrible card. 2. You're approximately dealing -9 to yourself (rfp-ing from the Graveyard could be said to be -1/3 of a card advantage, then you've got 5 S&T and 3 monsters). Then he attacks all your opponent's monsters, and you take 1000 LP damage every turn... not only that, during your Battle Phase YOU CAN'T ATTACK WITH OTHER MONSTERS... "Ultimate Tyranno" has the same beneficial effect with ZERO of the detriments. Giving this guy 6000/5500 just makes it a strong aggro monster... it doesn't balance out the fact you KILL YOURSELF trying to pull out a pixelated pokemon... So, yeah. LOLYCM. Both of these cards should burn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysterium Tremendum Posted December 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Wow' date=' this makes me sad. I can tell you why you both lose... 1. I discard a "Polymerization" (A card that, if I had ANY sense, I would KNOW not to use), and Tribute a lvl 7 or higher Dragon-Type monster (probably a monster with more effectiveness than this guy), to summon a monster that, in the meta, will PROBABLY have 2500 ATK/DEF (bad) and no effect on my opponent's Fusion Cards whatsoever. The only advantage I get is a once/turn -1 to my opponent in exchange for sending a card to the Graveyard (which is nice) and NOT BEING ABLE TO ATTACK.... terrible card. 2. You're approximately dealing -9 to yourself (rfp-ing from the Graveyard could be said to be -1/3 of a card advantage, then you've got 5 S&T and 3 monsters). Then he attacks all your opponent's monsters, and you take 1000 LP damage every turn... not only that, during your Battle Phase YOU CAN'T ATTACK WITH OTHER MONSTERS... "Ultimate Tyranno" has the same beneficial effect with ZERO of the detriments. Giving this guy 6000/5500 just makes it a strong aggro monster... it doesn't balance out the fact you KILL YOURSELF trying to pull out a pixelated pokemon... So, yeah. LOLYCM. Both of these cards should burn.[/quote'] Both of us will take your comments into consideration, however this is a 1 on 1 and I realize none of us have perfect cards, but please only votes. Score:Crisis King 1Xion 27 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 The title sounds quite desperate. Anyway... card A has good OCG, not so good image and a slightly overpowered effect, because of the (seemingly) low cost. Most people these days use exactly 0 fusions, so the final drawback of this card is kinda useless and could be omitted. card B is simply a mother fu*ker. Vote goes to...you can guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysterium Tremendum Posted December 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 kk, soon as this is over I'll correct my card. Score Crisis King: 2 Xion 27: 0 Thank you for voting and the critique. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Ryder Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Card A/Crisis King's card for better picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysterium Tremendum Posted December 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Score Crisis King: 3Xion 27: 0 Voting ends tommorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zektor Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 crisis king gmv better pic better effecrt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysterium Tremendum Posted December 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 kkFinal Score Crisis King: 4Xion 27: 0 That concludes it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.