Jump to content

[ZERO] NO REP <3 4 LZ?


Legend Zero

Recommended Posts

R-I-G-H-T..........I guess "thanks?"

 

I'm completely sure what that means.

Whoops' date=' sorry bout this I thought I said that on the other forum I'm on.......(ackward)

 

Anyway here is what I meant....

Eh, use more color variation, less c4ds, higher quality focals, better depth, composition, atmosphere, and all around basics. :P

I'm gonna have to disagree on some things.

1) I'm tired of different (sometimes the same) people telling me how many colors to use.

2) There is nothing wrong with the quality of my focal.

3) Depth is so there buddy.

4) You should just come out and say it totally sucks because in all of your comments you said it covered the whole tag. Last time I checked its better than that. =/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R-I-G-H-T..........I guess "thanks?"

 

I'm completely sure what that means.

Whoops' date=' sorry bout this I thought I said that on the other forum I'm on.......(ackward)

 

Anyway here is what I meant....

Eh, use more color variation, less c4ds, higher quality focals, better depth, composition, atmosphere, and all around basics. :P

I'm gonna have to disagree on some things.

1) I'm tired of different (sometimes the same) people telling me how many colors to use.

2) There is nothing wrong with the quality of my focal.

3) Depth is so there buddy.

4) You should just come out and say it totally sucks because in all of your comments you said it covered the whole tag. Last time I checked its better than that. =/

 

No 'ffence yo, but Rain knows more than you can even count on ur fingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna have to disagree on some things.

1) I'm tired of different (sometimes the same) people telling me how many colors to use. The use of monotone colors makes the tag look bad. More colors makes it more appealing and shows you can form colors together well' date=' instead of just slapping crap on with the same color, which is easy by the way.[/b']

2) There is nothing wrong with the quality of my focal. It looks sort of lower quality. :/ It may just be me.

3) Depth is so there buddy. Haha. Sure. Dawg, it's flat as hell. Look at the focal. It looks like you slapped it in there and erased so it blends in a bit with the c4ds. The c4ds look like they are a part of the focal, they have no distance apart from one another. It doesn't look like any attempt at depth was made at all, and this might have been better if you didn't go so insane with the c4ds.

4) You should just come out and say it totally sucks because in all of your comments you said it covered the whole tag. Last time I checked its better than that. =/ I'm not trying to be rude. That's why I didn't say it sucked. But it isn't better than that. Sorry, but it's truth. Learn to take criticism, son. Work on some better concepts than attacking with c4ds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...