Flame Dragon Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Thinking about getting it for Christmas, since I've heard it is a great game over all. Stiil, I want to know other people think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Do Want *drools* Just get it, You'll be happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I'll pass. I liked Wind Waker for it's new take on Zelda, but I just don't see buying this. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poseidon© Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I lost my DS, but it's supposed to be better than PH, even though it has a lower score. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I'll pass. I liked Wind Waker for it's new take on Zelda' date=' but I just don't see buying this. :/[/quote'] Did you play phantom hourglass? The only crappy thing in that game doesn't exist in this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I'll pass. I liked Wind Waker for it's new take on Zelda' date=' but I just don't see buying this. :/[/quote'] Did you play phantom hourglass? The only crappy thing in that game doesn't exist in this one. I played Phantom Hourglass for like... 20 minutes? Give or take. I just don't find it appealing is all. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I'll pass. I liked Wind Waker for it's new take on Zelda' date=' but I just don't see buying this. :/[/quote'] Did you play phantom hourglass? The only crappy thing in that game doesn't exist in this one. I played Phantom Hourglass for like... 20 minutes? Give or take. I just don't find it appealing is all. :/ T-T you broked my heart. Then again I'm a zelda fanboy. so Flame Dragon if you play alot of Zelda games and love them, get this, it's not a dissapointment. to new-comers. Play Ocarina, or Twilight Princess. Then Windwaker. If you get bored don't bother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I'll wait till I get Wind Waker and Phantom Hourglass before I get this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 YES!!! GET IT!!!!! YOU GET TO CONTROL PHANTOMS ON IT!!!!!! I READ THE ARTICLES IN NP ABOUT IT!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted December 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Yea, TBQH I've never played a Zelda game really. The few times I have I just picked it up from an old save point and never knew what I was doing. Still, I've always wanted to try a Zelda game. I'll wait till I get Wind Waker and Phantom Hourglass before I get this.Yea, I do agree. My mom was asking if I wanted any games and this one just came to mind since it was new. She didn't find it but did find Phantom Hourglass, so I asked for her to get that. If I like that I'll pick this game up. And I know, or at least think I know, that WW comes before either of the two, but since I know most Zelda games can stand alone I don't see a problem in getting PH, or even ST first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted December 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Thanks for the info. All i really knew about the 3 was that they happen in the same general part of the Zelda time line. Also I find this very odd, and very funny"GameSpot gave Spirit Tracks an 8.5/10, lower than the 9/10 for Phantom Hourglass, although Spirit Tracks was said to improve on all aspects of Phantom Hourglass." If it improved on everything from the first game, why is the score lower? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Hourglass is really only good for one play through. After that it's really boring. OT: DO WANT Only thing I don't like is that Link has a train. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I want to get this game. If I loved Phantom Hourglass, then I will love this game:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shradow Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. RLY? That might explain why he went from boats to trains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAG Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Just because I'm curious, can I see something that confirms this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Just because I'm curious' date=' can I see something that confirms this?[/quote']http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3176790 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAG Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Just because I'm curious' date=' can I see something that confirms this?[/quote']http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3176790 Ah. Very good. Very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Thanks for the info. All i really knew about the 3 was that they happen in the same general part of the Zelda time line. Also I find this very odd' date=' and very funny"GameSpot gave Spirit Tracks an 8.5/10, lower than the 9/10 for Phantom Hourglass, although Spirit Tracks was said to improve on all aspects of Phantom Hourglass." If it improved on everything from the first game, why is the score lower?[/quote'] because gamespots reviews are either A)Biased, or B)Generated to create controversy in this case, and in all cases in my opinion, take what the written review says. Numbers are pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Thanks for the info. All i really knew about the 3 was that they happen in the same general part of the Zelda time line. Also I find this very odd' date=' and very funny"GameSpot gave Spirit Tracks an 8.5/10, lower than the 9/10 for Phantom Hourglass, although Spirit Tracks was said to improve on all aspects of Phantom Hourglass." If it improved on everything from the first game, why is the score lower?[/quote'] because gamespots reviews are either A)Biased, or B)Generated to create controversy in this case, and in all cases in my opinion, take what the written review says. Numbers are pointless. Or you're just an angry fan-boy. :/ And you're supposed to ignore reviews anyways. Every one bashes on Monster Hunter, yet I love it to death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Thanks for the info. All i really knew about the 3 was that they happen in the same general part of the Zelda time line. Also I find this very odd' date=' and very funny"GameSpot gave Spirit Tracks an 8.5/10, lower than the 9/10 for Phantom Hourglass, although Spirit Tracks was said to improve on all aspects of Phantom Hourglass." If it improved on everything from the first game, why is the score lower?[/quote'] because gamespots reviews are either A)Biased, or B)Generated to create controversy in this case, and in all cases in my opinion, take what the written review says. Numbers are pointless. Or you're just an angry fan-boy. :/ And you're supposed to ignore reviews anyways. Every one bashes on Monster Hunter, yet I love it to death. D= in this case I'm not an angry fanboy, I'm fine with the score and I thought this review was fair. I'm describing the reason for the scores bieng different is that there stupid and don't comare scores or anything. a review score is just a number, if there's no written review theres no point. Gamespot does have a horrible habit of bieng biased though, they gave the Kane & Lynch game it's only good review becaused they got paid to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Thanks for the info. All i really knew about the 3 was that they happen in the same general part of the Zelda time line. Also I find this very odd' date=' and very funny"GameSpot gave Spirit Tracks an 8.5/10, lower than the 9/10 for Phantom Hourglass, although Spirit Tracks was said to improve on all aspects of Phantom Hourglass." If it improved on everything from the first game, why is the score lower?[/quote'] because gamespots reviews are either A)Biased, or B)Generated to create controversy in this case, and in all cases in my opinion, take what the written review says. Numbers are pointless. Or you're just an angry fan-boy. :/ And you're supposed to ignore reviews anyways. Every one bashes on Monster Hunter, yet I love it to death. D= in this case I'm not an angry fanboy, I'm fine with the score and I thought this review was fair. I'm describing the reason for the scores bieng different is that there stupid and don't comare scores or anything. a review score is just a number, if there's no written review theres no point. Gamespot does have a horrible habit of bieng biased though, they gave the Kane & Lynch game it's only good review becaused they got paid to do it. That's not being biased. That's getting payed. There's a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Thanks for the info. All i really knew about the 3 was that they happen in the same general part of the Zelda time line. Also I find this very odd' date=' and very funny"GameSpot gave Spirit Tracks an 8.5/10, lower than the 9/10 for Phantom Hourglass, although Spirit Tracks was said to improve on all aspects of Phantom Hourglass." If it improved on everything from the first game, why is the score lower?[/quote'] because gamespots reviews are either A)Biased, or B)Generated to create controversy in this case, and in all cases in my opinion, take what the written review says. Numbers are pointless. Or you're just an angry fan-boy. :/ And you're supposed to ignore reviews anyways. Every one bashes on Monster Hunter, yet I love it to death. D= in this case I'm not an angry fanboy, I'm fine with the score and I thought this review was fair. I'm describing the reason for the scores bieng different is that there stupid and don't comare scores or anything. a review score is just a number, if there's no written review theres no point. Gamespot does have a horrible habit of bieng biased though, they gave the Kane & Lynch game it's only good review becaused they got paid to do it. That's not being biased. That's getting payed. There's a difference. If your a gaming website, and your supposed to give honest reviews, so gamers know what is worth thier money and what is not, and you give favor to a particular game, even if it's bad, that is called bieng biased. whether or not you get paid is irrelevant. Bias: a particular tendency or inclination, esp. one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question; prejudice. If you get paid for it, that's adding Bribery to the list, which is worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Thanks for the info. All i really knew about the 3 was that they happen in the same general part of the Zelda time line. Also I find this very odd' date=' and very funny"GameSpot gave Spirit Tracks an 8.5/10, lower than the 9/10 for Phantom Hourglass, although Spirit Tracks was said to improve on all aspects of Phantom Hourglass." If it improved on everything from the first game, why is the score lower?[/quote'] because gamespots reviews are either A)Biased, or B)Generated to create controversy in this case, and in all cases in my opinion, take what the written review says. Numbers are pointless. Or you're just an angry fan-boy. :/ And you're supposed to ignore reviews anyways. Every one bashes on Monster Hunter, yet I love it to death. D= in this case I'm not an angry fanboy, I'm fine with the score and I thought this review was fair. I'm describing the reason for the scores bieng different is that there stupid and don't comare scores or anything. a review score is just a number, if there's no written review theres no point. Gamespot does have a horrible habit of bieng biased though, they gave the Kane & Lynch game it's only good review becaused they got paid to do it. That's not being biased. That's getting payed. There's a difference. If your a gaming website, and your supposed to give honest reviews, so gamers know what is worth thier money and what is not, and you give favor to a particular game, even if it's bad, that is called bieng biased. whether or not you get paid is irrelevant. Bias: a particular tendency or inclination, esp. one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question; prejudice. If you get paid for it, that's adding Bribery to the list, which is worse. No, biased is typically when picking something over another. If they said the game was better than another, then that's being biased. Specifically if they're getting paid to say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 WW and PH are directly related while ST features a new Link. Thanks for the info. All i really knew about the 3 was that they happen in the same general part of the Zelda time line. Also I find this very odd' date=' and very funny"GameSpot gave Spirit Tracks an 8.5/10, lower than the 9/10 for Phantom Hourglass, although Spirit Tracks was said to improve on all aspects of Phantom Hourglass." If it improved on everything from the first game, why is the score lower?[/quote'] because gamespots reviews are either A)Biased, or B)Generated to create controversy in this case, and in all cases in my opinion, take what the written review says. Numbers are pointless. Or you're just an angry fan-boy. :/ And you're supposed to ignore reviews anyways. Every one bashes on Monster Hunter, yet I love it to death. D= in this case I'm not an angry fanboy, I'm fine with the score and I thought this review was fair. I'm describing the reason for the scores bieng different is that there stupid and don't comare scores or anything. a review score is just a number, if there's no written review theres no point. Gamespot does have a horrible habit of bieng biased though, they gave the Kane & Lynch game it's only good review becaused they got paid to do it. That's not being biased. That's getting payed. There's a difference. If your a gaming website, and your supposed to give honest reviews, so gamers know what is worth thier money and what is not, and you give favor to a particular game, even if it's bad, that is called bieng biased. whether or not you get paid is irrelevant. Bias: a particular tendency or inclination, esp. one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question; prejudice. If you get paid for it, that's adding Bribery to the list, which is worse. No, biased is typically when picking something over another. If they said the game was better than another, then that's being biased. Specifically if they're getting paid to say that. Money fuels Prejudice, things that stop you bieng unpredjudiced fall under the category of bias. Besides nobody said they were saying This game was better than anything, but if they lie about a game bieng good because they got BRIBED, not paid, that is bieng biased. It's also noteworthy that bieng bribed to lie about a game is probably going to detract some readers. wether or not you think they were biased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.