Jesus Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 So YCM-kun. Let's talk about where this card should be at on a good list. gogogo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 It's being reprinted in the Twilight edition thing in January.I can see it maybe being semi'd or limited because of that. I dunno.But I'm definitely buying three Twilight editions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 ^ he said "on a good list". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 ^ he said "on a good list". Tell us then Pika. 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XP_Lulz Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I think it's should be @3 or MMMAAAYYBBBEEE @2 EDIT - Wait, NVM. Should be @1. Period Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I don't think this can be at three due to the ease of getting instant-wins with multiple copies. But it's not banworthy. Maybe limit it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Sworns abused this to much for it to stay at 3. It's just sad that an entire attribute has to suffer because of 1 archtype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Really, I only find it threatening in LS. Batterymanz doesn't really scare me with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 [/topic] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Over Nine Thou!---*gets shot* Limit it. v.v Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 [/topic] It's ATK Powah... waz OVAH 9,000!!!! Yeah. To bad Skill Drain Doesn't negate that. EDIT: got beaten to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 [/topic] It's ATK Powah... waz OVAH 9' date='000!!!! Yeah. To bad Skill Drain Doesn't negate that. EDIT: got beaten to it.[/quote'] NINJA'D. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XP_Lulz Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 [/topic] >.> Lightsworns. They Make This Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 [/topic] It's ATK Powah... waz OVAH 9' date='000!!!! Yeah. To bad Skill Drain Doesn't negate that. EDIT: got beaten to it.[/quote'] NINJA'D. ;D OnT: Probably Limited be good. But I see Konami doing a Semi instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Personally I feel Honest should be at 1...either that or errata away the fact that you can stack his effect. At 1, it seems far less of a threat but still significant enough to be good LIGHT support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 OnT: Probably Limited be good. But I see Konami doing a Semi instead.I doubt they will limit it for a while. Seeing as how people will go crazy' date=' and buy thousands of the Twilight packs for the copies of Honest. Thus, giving Konami more The Money.Which is exactly my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Maybe their going to sell a bunch, then limit it. How's that> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 OnT: Probably Limited be good. But I see Konami doing a Semi instead.I doubt they will limit it for a while. Seeing as how people will go crazy' date=' and buy thousands of the Twilight packs for the copies of Honest. Thus, giving Konami more The Money.Which is exactly my point. Twilight pack will be released quite a bit before the new banlist. Enough time to extract all the cash out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 The Twilight Pack comes out in January right? And the next list is in March? Yeah, they can handle it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Common Sense has led us to this break through. So I'll be predicting a limit on Honest this coming banlist. And maybe if they are doing such with Honest...They'll do JD too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Common Sense has led us to this break through. So I'll be predicting a limit on Honest this coming banlist. And maybe if they are doing such with Honest...They'll do JD too. With Konami, I doubt JD will be touched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Not banworthy. You could argue that it's abusive with multiple copies of itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Well, if their going to touch Honest, then it's likely they'll do JD, since Honest isn't threatning in the OCG, because I've heard LS doesn't rule there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 They wouldn't dare touch JD for now.... Also, to Arm's vid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 well basically this thread sums up ycm honest should be at 3 because a good list does not mean "lets semi anything that can have more than 1 copy of itself in a deck, or ban anything thats even slightly good" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.