Grunt Issun Posted November 28, 2009 Report Share Posted November 28, 2009 ok so you guys all know what red eyes black dragon looks like but what about ultimate dragon, would he have 3 heads with glowing red eyes, body plates on his neck? what about red eyes zombie dragon, mecha dragon,Red eyes UD: 4500atk 3000def fusion materials 3-red eyes black dragons. LVL 12 Red eyes ZD: 2700atk 2500def. this card can only be special summoned by removing from play 1 red eyes black dragon from the graveyard. LVL 8 red eyes MD: 3500atk 3000def. this card can only be special summoned by tributing 1 red eyes B dragon equipped with metal morph. LVL 7 feel free to make any suggestions, show good pictures, comment, or show similar cards.:D ok bye Link to comment
windpepper Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 Bad OCG, bap spelling, way OP'd. 3/10 Link to comment
Aero~ Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 6/10-There's already a Red-Eyes Zombie Dragon Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 6/10-There's already a Red-Eyes Zombie Dragon and a Metal Dragon. Bad OCG' date=' bap spelling, way [b']U[/b]P'd. 3/10 5/10. You tried, now make us want to play them. Give them cool names and effects. Link to comment
windpepper Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 6/10-There's already a Red-Eyes Zombie Dragon and a Metal Dragon. Bad OCG' date=' bap spelling, way [b']U[/b]P'd. 3/10 5/10. You tried, now make us want to play them. Give them cool names and effects. Ah, yeah you're right. After re-reading carefully through all the bad spelling I see how they could be UP'd. Link to comment
Spartan919 Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 Bad OCG' date=' bap spelling, way OP'd.[/quote'] But I like the idea. 5/10 Link to comment
Grunt Issun Posted November 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 6/10-There's already a Red-Eyes Zombie Dragonlol youre righti didnt know that Link to comment
RAEGING D0GKING Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 BAD OCGThere real Cards3/10 Link to comment
Baltoli Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Dude, the second two are actually real cards...*Facepalm* Link to comment
Grunt Issun Posted November 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 BAD OCGThere real Cards3/10 I KNOW I KNOW sheesh i got enough of those comments but theres no UD Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted December 1, 2009 Report Share Posted December 1, 2009 sheesh i got enough of those comments but theres no UD UD? Link to comment
Grunt Issun Posted December 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 sheesh i got enough of those comments but theres no UD UD? sorry my computer messed me up i was meaning to write UNDERSTANDING like im geetinh horrible ratings because i have two already made cards yet i have another card that people ignore because i have to already made cards Link to comment
~Duo~ Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Unoriginal, and I think UD is OP'd because that is exactly the same ATK as Blue Eyes UD. 3.5/10 Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Bad OCG' date=' [b']bap[/b] spelling, way OP'd. 3/10 It's gooder than yours. This is how I'd do them. Red-Eyes Ultimate DragonDARKLevel: 12[Dragon/Fusion/Effect]"Red-Eyes Black Dragon" + 2 "Red-Eyes" monsters except "Red-Eyes B. Chick"This card cannot be Special Summoned except by Fusion Summon. Once per turn' date=' you can send 1 card your opponent controls to the Graveyard, and this card loses 1000 ATK.ATK/ 4500DEF/ 3000 Red-Eyes NecrodragonDARKLevel: 8[Zombie/Effect']This card cannot be Normal Summoned or set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by removing from play 1 "Red-Eyes" monster in your Graveyard, except "Red-Eyes B. Chick".ATK/ 2700DEF/ 2500 I didn't bother with the last one because it's word-for-word the real one, except with more ATK and DEF and a lower Level. On what you did, I see you tried, but... 4/10. Link to comment
Magnet Soldier Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Unoriginal' date=' and I think UD is OP'd because that is exactly the same ATK as Blue Eyes UD. 3.5/10[/quote'] It's actually UPed as it's weaker than BEUD as BEUD has 3900 DEF but His UD has 3000 def. Altogether bad Idea, 2/10 as The last two are real cards. Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Unoriginal' date=' and I think UD is OP'd because that is exactly the same ATK as Blue Eyes UD. 3.5/10[/quote'] It's actually UPed as it's weaker than BEUD as BEUD has 3900 DEF but His UD has 3000 def. Altogether bad Idea, 2/10 as The last two are real cards. Actually, it has 3800 DEF, and the Gold Series misprint has 3000. So, yeah... But I agree with everything else you said. Link to comment
Magnet Soldier Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Unoriginal' date=' and I think UD is OP'd because that is exactly the same ATK as Blue Eyes UD. 3.5/10[/quote'] It's actually UPed as it's weaker than BEUD as BEUD has 3900 DEF but His UD has 3000 def. Altogether bad Idea, 2/10 as The last two are real cards. Actually, it has 3800 DEF, and the Gold Series misprint has 3000. So, yeah... But I agree with everything else you said. I meant 3800, I was typing to fast. I had Rps to do. Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Unoriginal' date=' and I think UD is OP'd because that is exactly the same ATK as Blue Eyes UD. 3.5/10[/quote'] It's actually UPed as it's weaker than BEUD as BEUD has 3900 DEF but His UD has 3000 def. Altogether bad Idea, 2/10 as The last two are real cards. Actually, it has 3800 DEF, and the Gold Series misprint has 3000. So, yeah... But I agree with everything else you said. I meant 3800, I was typing to fast. I had Rps to do. Then I apologize for my rudeness. Seriously, duelcreator, consider taking my designs. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.