Sunshine Jesse Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 YATA IS INCREDIBLY BANWORTHY AND NO AMOUNT OF CHANGES TO THE LIST WILL CHANGE THAT. STOP SUGGESTING HIM BEING UNBANNED.*ahem* That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Opponent has 50 life points left. Attack his mechanicalchaser with Gemini Elf. One Hit KO. I misinterpreted the definition of "One-hit KO." See reasoning in previous post. *facepalm*Alright then' date=' by your logic Yata shouldn't have been banned. He'll be like JD and such. Wait, if we have JD and DAD not banned, then why still keep yata? and by yata, I mean ONLY Yata, and not the other card.[/quote'] Yata is bannable with or without Norleras. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Besides' date=' you might as well ban JD and DAD because they are 1 HIT KO[/quote'] Yes. Thats stupid. The way you worded your statement was so ambiguous that I didn't fully understand what it meant until Fraz posted after you. The "You win the Duel" cards are bannable because they let you win no matter what the Life Point count. JD and DAD should obviously be banned for reasons other than that. Your making the meta focusing on Beat down decks if you did that. Which is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 If they made a card that said "You must have exactly one lifepoint left, 9 cards in hand, 3 cards in grave, opponent must have 2 cards in hand and be named John to activate this card. You win the duel." Would you ban it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 If they made a card that said "You must have exactly one lifepoint left' date=' 9 cards in hand, 3 cards in grave, opponent must have 2 cards in hand and be named John to activate this card. You win the duel." Would you ban it?[/quote'] Yes he would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 If they made a card that said "You must have exactly one lifepoint left' date=' 9 cards in hand, 3 cards in grave, opponent must have 2 cards in hand and be named [b']Gary[/b] to activate this card. You win the duel." Would you ban it? Superior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 I swear I see this one before.....somewhere.... BTW why is Gemini Fusion Banned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 If they made a card that said "You must have exactly one lifepoint left' date=' 9 cards in hand, 3 cards in grave, opponent must have 2 cards in hand and be named [b']Freddy[/b] to activate this card. You win the duel." Would you ban it? Superior. Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Your making the meta focusing on Beat down decks if you did that. Which is stupid. BWLSVolcanicanything really If they made a card that said "You must have exactly one lifepoint left' date=' 9 cards in hand, 3 cards in grave, opponent must have 2 cards in hand and be named John to activate this card. You win the duel." Would you ban it?[/quote'] My name is John, but that's beside the point. I suppose point proven. List edited. BTW why is Gemini Fusion Banned? GigaDriver OTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Your making the meta focusing on Beat down decks if you did that. Which is stupid. BWLSVolcanicanything really You should ban REDRUM. He can OTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell-Razor Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 God why people still answering to this thread, he banned megarock dragon omfg Joke thread surely... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 You should ban REDRUM. He can OTK. With my current banlist in mind' date=' how so? God why people still answering to this thread, he banned megarock dragon omfg Joke thread surely... A monster that can easily reach over 8000 ATK isn't exactly balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 You should ban REDRUM. He can OTK. With my current banlist in mind' date=' how so? God why people still answering to this thread, he banned megarock dragon omfg Joke thread surely... A monster that can easily reach over 8000 ATK isn't exactly balanced. He swarms. Really. F****** fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 He swarms. Really. F****** fast. Once per turn =/= fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 He swarms. Really. F****** fast. Once per turn =/= fast. You can summon 3 in one turn 3=6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 He swarms. Really. F****** fast. By that reasoning, let's ban Gale and Bora too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Then ban red eyes wyvern obv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Summon REDRUMRevive DragonRFG to Summon REDRUMRevive DragonRFG to summon REDRUMRevive Dragon I'm not advocating his banning because of how situational it is, but that's how he can swarm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 He swarms. Really. F****** fast. By that reasoning' date=' let's ban Gale and Bora too.[/quote'] Yes because all of them can attack for game in one turn! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Seriously, give it up. REDRUM shouldn't be banned. He forces you to run an abundant amount of Dragons, which aren't exactly great in the first place. You know it, too; you're just trying to give me a hard time. It's balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors, then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then "God in Dragon form" if you will, and nothing less than good theme support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell-Razor Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Oh my f***ing god... Why are there so many retarded people on this site... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Oh my f***ing god... Why are there so many retarded people on this site... Idk, have you been multiplying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Seriously' date=' give it up. REDRUM shouldn't be banned. He forces you to run an abundant amount of Dragons, which aren't exactly great in the first place. You know it, too; you're just trying to give me a hard time. It's balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors, then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then "God in Dragon form" if you will, and nothing less than good theme support.[/quote'] /facepalm You need to learn to troll. Only then will you recognise the troll of others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 I knew those were trolls since I'm a troll.*gets shocked look from everyone*Hey, I'm a troll during the full moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Seriously' date=' give it up. REDRUM shouldn't be banned. He forces you to run an abundant amount of Dragons, which aren't exactly great in the first place. You know it, too; you're just trying to give me a hard time. It's balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors, then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then "God in Dragon form" if you will, and nothing less than good theme support.[/quote'] /facepalm You need to learn to troll. Only then will you recognise the troll of others. [troll-ralted-image.jpg] Red-Eyes Darkness Metal gives people an excuse to name there "LOL DRAGON DEK!" as a "Hopeless Dragon" deck, and make it look professional. Well... at 37.95 a copy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.