Jolta Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Ragnarok is a noob that didn't change. He spams. Anyways, the noobs neg us. We just report them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Assclown Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Ragnarok is a noob that didn't change. He spams. Anyways' date=' the noobs neg us. We just report them.[/quote'] I beg to differ. How exactly is he a noob? Because he doesn't know GFX that well, because he apparently hasn't made any cards? (when in fact he has) And lemme guess, his "spam" is all the card reviews he gives in Realistic Cards? Lol, that's not spam, it's rating. Come on, let's hear it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Ragnarok is a noob that didn't change. He spams. Anyways' date=' the noobs neg us. We just report them.[/quote'] I beg to differ. How exactly is he a noob? Because he doesn't know GFX that well, because he apparently hasn't made any cards? (when in fact he has) And lemme guess, his "spam" is all the card reviews he gives in Realistic Cards? Lol, that's not spam, it's rating. Come on, let's hear it. I just sense fishiness. He didn't make cards, he comments on cards, that's wrong. He doesn't help. He says stuff at the wrong time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Assclown Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Ragnarok is a noob that didn't change. He spams. Anyways' date=' the noobs neg us. We just report them.[/quote'] I beg to differ. How exactly is he a noob? Because he doesn't know GFX that well, because he apparently hasn't made any cards? (when in fact he has) And lemme guess, his "spam" is all the card reviews he gives in Realistic Cards? Lol, that's not spam, it's rating. Come on, let's hear it. I just sense fishiness. He didn't make cards, he comments on cards, that's wrong. He doesn't help. He says stuff at the wrong time. He has made cards although, they were posted by Lovely Lady Duelist. Yeah, I just proved you wrong. Just search it in Realistic Cards. And to be honest, he does help. He gives corrections (not OCG but effect corrections) and advice/tips. Oh, wait, but since it's Ragnarok we're talking about, it must be wrong, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 He does help actually, its just many people cannot handle the truth about their cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Assclown Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 He does help actually' date=' its just many people cannot handle the truth about their cards.[/quote'] See? Even a mod agrees with me. Next time, don't change the subject. Now, get back to what this thread is meant to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Sorry no support. If they don't read the rules the first time, it's okay. But if they repeatedly do it, then they deserve it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 He does help actually' date=' its just many people cannot handle the truth about their cards.[/quote'] See? Even a mod agrees with me. Next time, don't change the subject. Now, get back to what this thread is meant to be. What? Assistance... Bad... LL assists him.. Anyways, you mods should really grab your hammars and start banning noobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 If we started banning noobs the site would not see new members, without new members the site would become stale and i really dont want the site to remain what it is now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 OR we could just add this rule: Level 1 and 2 members cannot get reputation of any kind. This way, there will be less rep spam. And anyway, just because someone can't be negged it doesn't mean he cannot be banned! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Merciful Idiot Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 They have no excuse for not reading the rules; they should know the rules before they sign up. I did' date=' at least. No support.[/quote'] Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 OR we could just add this rule: Level 1 and 2 members cannot get or give reputation of any kind. This way' date=' there will be less rep spam. And anyway, just because someone can't be negged it doesn't mean he cannot be banned![/quote'] Fix'd to be better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 OR we could just add this rule: Level 1 and 2 members cannot get or give reputation of any kind. This way' date=' there will be less rep spam. And anyway, just because someone can't be negged it doesn't mean he cannot be banned![/quote'] Fix'd to be better. Ok then. Who supports me and Raspberry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windowlicker Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Ragnarok is a noob that didn't change. He spams. Anyways' date=' the noobs neg us. We just report them.[/quote']And lemme guess, his "spam" is all the card reviews he gives in Realistic Cards? Lol, that's not spam, it's flooding. Sorry, I just had to fix that. OT: I think that everyone should have equal rights, as not only would it be injust to the newbies, it would mean that every other newbie would spam their way to 3 stars, which would sure be fun for the mods to clean up. And if a newbie doesn't like his neg rep, he/she can PM a mod and they can decide whether it needs removing. Or they can QQ in the rep complaint thread. No support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 I think that 1/2-week warnings would be the best punishment for newbs who occasionally spam, since if they stop spamming it'll go away quickly, and if they continue it's more justifiable to ban/100% warn them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 If you don't read the rules, tough.No support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 If you don't read the rules' date=' tough.No support.[/quote'] I think that 1/2-week warnings would be the best punishment for newbs who occasionally spam' date=' since if they stop spamming it'll go away quickly, and if they continue it's more justifiable to ban/100% warn them.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 I usually look the other way or delete the Offensive post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 He does help actually' date=' its just many people cannot handle the truth about their cards.[/quote'] Yes he does, but his mannerisms is as if it's a MUST. And that's just wrong...And truth? Lord knows how many times we've had to correct him. Bad advice is bad. But, good intentions is good. If we started banning noobs the site would not see new members' date=' without new members the site would become stale and i really dont want the site to remain what it is now.[/quote'] ... -_-' If we start banning 'n00bs', lets start with Raspberry to teach him a lesson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katoki Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 I suport becuase really no new member is gonna read the rules they came here to have fun not to read rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windowlicker Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 I suport becuase really no new member is gonna read the rules they came here to have fun not to read rules How someone can get their kicks from spamming beats me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katoki Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 Hey some spam is funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 TC's best arguement is 'they don't look at the rules'.Provide a valid reason supporting the idea that we shouldn't punish people who break the rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorrow. Posted November 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 I said that thing.....Wow I thought this died... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 I don't know which horrifies me more: that someone suggested we shouldn't give people neg reps just for spamming, thread-hijacking, and ignoring the rules, or that ragnarok1945 hasn't been banned yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.