Master Hyperion Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Hey YCM, stop making stupid threads with questions that can easily be answered in the Yu-Gi-Oh! Q&A thread. Or did you all of the sudden forgot that the thread ever existed? Now, on to the topic: Discuss these 2 cards. Oh, and what do you people think about this:What happens if Gladiator Beast Gyzarus actually get banned? It's obvious that Bestiari won't be a problem anymore (not that it ever was) and can easily be unlimited. The question is: what is the perfect number of Bestiari's to be ran in GB decks? And if you think that Gyzarus is not a problem because Bestiari is at 1 makes Gyzarus harder to summon and can easily be countered, please learn how a Gladiator Beast decks work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 The real question is: "Who will run GBs when Gyzarus is banned?". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 The real question is: "Who will run GBs when Gyzarus is banned?". The real real question is: "Who is still running GBs in the first place" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 The real question is: "Who will run GBs when Gyzarus is banned?". The real real question is: "Who is still running GBs in the first place" There are some people. :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Bestiari needed to be limited by Konami's reasoning because it makes prisma glads, a non/mixed archetype deck, really really good. Besti at 1 makes prisma glads a lot less powerful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Bestiari needed to be limited by Konami's reasoning because it makes prisma glads' date=' a non/mixed archetype deck, really really good. Besti at 1 makes prisma glads a lot less powerful.[/quote'] Or maybe it was because Prisma Glads were broken, but the didn't want to kill the deck by banning Gyza. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Prisma glads weren't broken, just very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Flame Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Gladiator Beasts, if used correctly are more powerful than LS. The only reason LS stands a chance is because of JD. I made a GB deck on stardust accelerator, it owns every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathxy Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 in wc09 LS doesn't have charge and solemn is in 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 in wc09 LS doesn't have charge and solemn is in 3 Get the current list' date=' rook.Wc09 lets you do that. Oh, and I like how Bestiari was like: "Im angry, and you wouldnt like me when im angry!".......And then because the Incredible [s']Hulk[/s]Gyzarus And i like how its another case of Fortress Dragon. Konami cant just ban the fusion, and unlimit the required monster.:/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathxy Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 sorry, i forgot i dont conect the ds to the internet that doesnt change that LS doesnt have charge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 that doesnt change that LS doesnt have charge At the time of Wc09's creation, we didnt have Light of Destruction yet.So thats why. Also, DAD is the top card in Wc09 because of this. Not JD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 we didnt have Light of Destruction yet. *facepalm* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 that doesnt change that LS doesnt have charge At the time of Wc09's creation' date=' we didnt have [b']Light of Destruction[/b] yet.So thats why. Also, DAD is the top card in Wc09 because of this. Not JD. dont u mean we dont have TCG cards.or are u just trollin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Bad players will either trying to stop run GBs or lose more. Good players will learn to deal with it. Gyzarus isn't needed to win games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 that doesnt change that LS doesnt have charge At the time of Wc09's creation' date=' we didnt have [b']Light of Destruction[/b] yet.So thats why. Also, DAD is the top card in Wc09 because of this. Not JD. dont u mean we dont have TCG cards.or are u just trollin? By "We", I mean the US.And "By the US", I mean the TCG-Only cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 :| Gyzarus is a fagbeast card, and that's the only reason they ever win. Tagging into murmillo 3 times and dropping a heraklinos is not game winning now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VolTama Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Gyzarus, JD, and Black Whirlwind should all be banned, instead of limiting things that only slightly weaken said cards. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Let's face it, Gyzarus is the real reason Bestiari is limited. If Konami could stop pimping X-Sabers and giving us Dark Rabbit as a rare, and actually focus on making a new Gyzarus with the same requirements but with a more balanced effect, maybe we'll see Bestiari at 3 again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Gyzarus' date=' JD, and Black Whirlwind should all be banned, instead of limiting things that only slightly weaken said cards. =/[/quote']JD needs to stay at 2 in order to stop bad decks from being playable. Gyzarus needs to be nerfed, or have Test Tiger banned or Limited.Black Whirlwind should be at most 2, but Vayu is my main concern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.