Father Wolf Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 just and idea i had to make the blue eyes fusion better and not suck as much. its might be a little overpowerd but meh oh welland yes i did the art work.comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God GAK Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 Not so good image. This is BEUD. 6/10 Underpowered. Bad OCG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L33t Jenkins Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 Nice card but it is removed from play not removed from game and yes a little overpowered because if it attacked directly 3 times you would win unless they negated it or have mre than 9000 life points 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 Not so good image. This is BEUD. 6/10 Underpowered. Bad OCG Bad OCG?! How was that bad? I read the card effect and saw nothing wrong with the wording, expect an little thing, see above this post But it is a little underpoweredI say, 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L33t Jenkins Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 how is ot underpowerd it can 3 times on the same turn and it doesnt say it can't attack directly it can inlfict 9000 damge in one turn how is that underpowered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry OldMaster Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 Not so good image. This is BEUD. 6/10 Underpowered. Bad OCG Image's perfect >_>It wasn't meant as BEUD >_>Only the monster LOOKS like it.I'd say, highen his ATK till 3500, and make the second remove from play effect (note: remove from PLAY, not game) just "destroy this card".Marvelous OTK card. 7.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L33t Jenkins Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 Not so good image. This is BEUD. 6/10 Underpowered. Bad OCG Image's perfect >_>It wasn't meant as BEUD >_>Only the monster LOOKS like it.I'd say' date=' highen his ATK till 3500, and make the second remove from play effect (note: remove from PLAY, not game) just "destroy this card".Marvelous OTK card. 7.6/10[/quote']It is not underpowered it is overpowered 3000 can attack 3 times in a row and they all can be dirrect attacks raise it to 3500 and it could do over 1000 in one single turn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RestLess-BoTics Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 I guess im the only one who'll say : cool card! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwhkiller Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 good card a little over power, i dont really like the picture because it looks the same as the BEUD. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Z Posted December 5, 2007 Report Share Posted December 5, 2007 This card really is good... amazing infact... 10/10... keep up the good work... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gungeransu Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 HEY! I found nothing wrong with BEUD at all. I loved it, especially when I combo'd it with Megamorph. Ah, the old days.... XD Anyway, on to this card. First, fix it up like this:1)Blue-Eyes White Dragon + Blue-Eyes White Dragon + Blue-Eyes White DragonWhen this card is Fusion Summoned, remove 1 Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon in your Fusion Deck from play. Place 3 counters on this card (max. 3). This card can attack a number of times during the Battle Phase equal to the number of counters on it. If this card is targeted by the effect of a Spell or Trap Card, negate the effect of that card and remove 1 counter from this card. If there are no counters on this card, it is removed from play. Ok. That's how I think the effect should be worded. OCG is out of the way now.2)Next, this card is overpowered. Sure, 3 Blue-Eyes and a Polymerization are hard to all get at once, but it still is possible.The reason I say it is overpowered is because it has 3000 ATK and can attack 3 times, making a potential 9000 damage in one turn. OTKs result in being banned, and that's never good. I understand that three heads mean three attacks, but we can fix that by putting in a couple drawbacks that weigh that part down. If, by the first part, you mean that you can't play it at all unless you have a BEUD in your Fusion Deck, then that's good. If so, it should be worded (instead of the first part): This card cannot be Fusion Summoned from the Fusion Deck except by removing 1 "Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon" in your Fusion Deck from play. That's a decent drawback. The next is already in your card. When it is targeted by a Spell or Trap, you have to remove a counter. That's good like it is. Lastly, I know it kinda cramps the card up, but if another drawback to this card was locking your side of the field up, it would probably be a better card, in terms of balanced play. So, just add this (before the counter part, and after the BEUD removal): As long as this card remains face-up on your side of the field, you cannot Summon and/or Set a monster on your side of the field. That should clear things up a little bit.3)Lastly, it is time for me to rate this card. I like dragons, but a 3000 attacker that can attack three times is overpowered, so you get a 7/10 (Average). Other than that, I love this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacred Dragon Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 good but to many stars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 hmmm, your summons need to capitalized, i give you a 8/10 i love blue eyes!!! aweomseom !!! =) 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balvarine Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Nice idea,almost marvelous.It is OTK card.BTW,you do not have to attack 3 times successfully and it is almost balanced(not completely--->do not remove it from play(your opponent can activate sakuretsu armor(example)at any time and remove it from play and he can even equip it with bad card "dragon treasure"just to rid of one of your counters)(of course you'll make a Deck for it and such thing might be impossible)) and I would add:"....When this card is specifically targeted by the effects of a Spell or Trap Card,remove 1 counter to negate the activation Spell or Trap Card and destroy it."--->This card is not that overpowered(the conditions and solutions for which card to combine to improve resolving of this card's effect are however questionable) and it is slightly /underpowered/---->(it is not only cuz you do not remove it from play and if you are insisting on Fusion Summon)One thing,let us say this card was Special Summoned and sent to the Graveyard,if you're using "re-fusion" for example you'll not have any counters on it,so it is a good card and cannot have its effect resolved with "cyber-stein" because it cannot be even summoned by himBut by this tweak this should be solved;----->"If this card was Fusion Summoned sucessfully,during the turn this card has no remaining counters,it is destroyed and sent to the Graveyard"now you can use refusion and cyber stein and that reviving cards.---->I calculated it carefully and my point of view is....very good!-------->7.201/10!------>just because you are forced to Fusion Summon it.I would give it 8.9/10-->(maybe)! if you use my little tweak.Good card,little grammar inappropriate expressions(play,not game)Capitalise often on various words due to correct OCG in your card's text.The most important thing is idea and effect and power.I do not care about pic.It has to be at least decent.----------------------------------------------------------------------------Thank you for giving me a chance to rate your card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.