Bringerofcake Posted January 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Added. Link to comment
jonahwilder13101 Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 "Ha! I can beat that with my______!" Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted February 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 Added a few Flip Effects. Link to comment
jabber2033 Posted March 1, 2010 Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 Helpful thread is helpful. This should be stickied. +1 Rep for good idea! Link to comment
Darj Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 I have a question: Which is the difference between:"Remove from play... from your Graveyard to..."OR"Remove from play... in your Graveyard to..."? Both effects have been used in newly released cards (see DaD and Ghoulungulate"), so you cannot say that "from" is the new OCG for "in" and vice-versa. And regarding the above: which of those 2 OCG is more acceptable? Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted March 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 I have a question: Which is the difference between:"Remove from play... from your Graveyard to..."OR"Remove from play... in your Graveyard to..."? Both effects have been used in newly released cards (see DaD and Ghoulungulate")' date=' so you cannot say that "from" is the new OCG for "in" and vice-versa. And regarding the above: which of those 2 OCG is more acceptable?[/quote'] I'm going to say that there is no difference between the two effects, and that "in" is more acceptable, if only because it eliminates the repetition of words, which is oftentimes a no-no in writing of any style. Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 Helpful thread is helpful. This should be stickied. +1 Rep for good idea! Yeah' date=' it should. If only a Mod or Admin would see it and do that. "If this card is sent from your hand or Deck to the Graveyard by {a/your opponent's} card effect, ..." "If this card would be destroyed, you can {insert action here} instead."[hr'] An important one for rulings:"When this card is destroyed, you can..."VS"If this card is destroyed, you can..." The former can miss the timing. The latter can't. Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted March 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 Added Genma's new rules. Link to comment
Icy Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Stuck lol. I can definitely see myself using this thread in the future. Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 WOOHOO!!! I GOT A THREAD STUCK! Ahem. I've revamped the monsters section for some simplicity. Also, I want to emphasize on card effects more, since I've also done some work on the other two sections. Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted March 18, 2010 Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 There seems to be a difference of wordings for Ignition Effects: FIELD"Once per turn, you can {insert cost to be paid here} to {insert function to be performed here}." GRAVEYARD"If this card is in your Graveyard, you can activate this card's effect by {insert cost to be paid here}. {insert function to be performed here}." That's taken from Level Eater (loosely). Interchangeable with the other way, as with Necro Gardna. Link to comment
Horu Posted March 19, 2010 Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 well i don't mind the wording of some cards but there are people that make the effects like ultra complex and mess up horribly on the wording. i just tell them to refer to the real cards until they catch on to the proper ocg and ways a card is balanced. i've been making cards forever and i still mess up in some of the wording. but normally cause i'm trying to find how i want an effect to be worded and i'll remake the card atleast 6 times until i'm fully satisfied. Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted March 19, 2010 Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 Something I realized needed pointing out: Koa'ki Meiru text (Maintenance Cost):-During the End Phase, this card is destroyed unless {insert requirement here}. VS.: Yubel's text (Effect)-During the End Phase, either {insert requirement here} or destroy this card. Skill Drain won't negate the former, but it will the latter. Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted March 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 Hmmm... I know what to do about that. Link to comment
Artius Posted March 19, 2010 Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 Kuiaja The Brutal Abyss Dragon (Dragon/Synchro/Effect) level 8 atk:2600 def:2500 .When this card is on the field in defense position, activates this effect. If the opponent has one monster or more in defense position, you can attack him directly using in his graveyard the attacking power of all of monsters. If this card effect is not activated by an effect of a card on the field or graveyard, double your monsters attack and defense points. Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted March 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 3 things: 1. Broken as hell.2. Doesn't belong in this thread.3. Could definitely use an OCG cleanup. Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted March 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 Added the Contact Fusion clause. Link to comment
Darj Posted April 2, 2010 Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 Some more phrases: Activation condition:"While you control a/another [insert kind of monster here (DARK, "Ice Barrier", etc.)] monster,..." Summoning condition:"If your opponent controls [insert number and/or kind of monsters here: no monsters, 2 LIGHT monsters, etc.] (and you control no monsters), you can Special Summon this card from your hand." "This card cannot be Special Summoned (from your hand/Deck/Graveyard)" Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted May 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 Feedback on the guide so far? Anything you think needs adding? Link to comment
dragondestroyer Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 when this card destroys an opponents monster by battle inflict _____ damage to your opponent. and when this card destroys an opponents monster by battle inflict damage to your opponent equal to ______ Link to comment
wiithepeople Posted July 6, 2010 Report Share Posted July 6, 2010 "...switch this card to Defense (and/or) Attack Position..." Link to comment
El Renardo Posted July 7, 2010 Report Share Posted July 7, 2010 Could this be added?Monsters: Battling: "You take no Battle Damage from battles involving his card." (Taken off of Spell Striker's effect.) Link to comment
The True Ace Attorney Posted July 19, 2010 Report Share Posted July 19, 2010 I'm quite sure that Ritual stuff isn't here: Spell: "This card is used to Ritual Summon "(Scary Ritual Monster Name)". You must also Tribute monsters from the field or your hand whose total Levels equal (Scary Ritual Monster Level) or more." Monster: "This monster can only be Ritual Summoned with the Ritual Spell Card, "(Scary Monsters Ritual Spell)"." Also adding "Rampaging Rhynos"' text for anyone interested: "Once per turn, this card can move to an adjacent unoccupied Monster Card Zone." I'm not too sure if there's any cards that share this effect. Nor do I know if any others share the "If this card attacks the monster in its same column, this card gains 500 ATK during the Damage Step." effect, or anything related, either. Link to comment
Flinsbon Posted July 30, 2010 Report Share Posted July 30, 2010 The following is an OCG rule (not a phrase) that I see broken all too often. can or cannot, there is no may. Yeah, I'm a Star Wars geek :) Also... This card cannot be destroyed by battle. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.