Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 I agree that the banned member should at least have access to PMs. That way, they could probably contest their ban. So basically, support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limited Edition KING Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Long story short, I will support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 No support. People are banned for a reason, they need to be punished. Get MSN something then. If no MSN, get a friend to argue for you. Or jst accept it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Support. However, if possible, they would only be able to send messages to mods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Support. However' date=' if possible, they would only be able to send messages to mods.[/quote'] Good suggestion. If this is what happens, then I do support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muluck Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 The whole point of a ban is to deny you access to communication on the forum. Giving you access to your PM's would defeat the purpose of a ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Ya support.What if someone gets banned for a bad reason?However, how about PM abusers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 I support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Merciful Idiot Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 I......support this.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KurashiDragon Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 I would only support this if there would be some way to ban PM spammers if they well spam in the pms. Otherwise it completely ruins the reason behind the no pm ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Ryder Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 I support. Even though I've never been banned on YCM before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Support if it is possible for mods to choose between this option and the current one, to stop abuse over PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windowlicker Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 OMGAKITTY, you're so predictable.I still support though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Bishop Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Support. I need backup if I get banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Support. Might be needed in the future. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackmen10 Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Support, my old account got hacked and perma-banned while I was on holiday. I couldn't argue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwebs1 Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 I support this just in case I need it someday This^. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShootingTheMoon Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Glass supports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted October 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 The whole point of a ban is to deny you access to communication on the forum. Giving you access to your PM's would defeat the purpose of a ban. Mods are far from perfect, and can often give out bans for bad or just plain stupid reasons. I reserve the right to be able to argue my case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 The whole point of a ban is to deny you access to communication on the forum. Giving you access to your PM's would defeat the purpose of a ban. Mods are far from perfect' date=' and can often give out bans for bad or just plain stupid reasons. I reserve the right to be able to argue my case.[/quote'] It's called e-mail. ;D No support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 As has been said earlier in this thread, giving banned members access to PM would defeat the purpose of a ban. Not support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShootingTheMoon Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 You wouldn't know what it was like to be banned so don't go saying it would defeat the purpose! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinnamonStar Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Wait you got 50% warning for spamming? Isn't accidentally spam 10% and intentional is 20% or 30%? Depends on the mod and section.Default warnings are set on 20% for mild and 50 for intentional spamming.And then there's spamming and spamming. And flaming and flaming. If that makes any sense.*_* Even that Super Mod I know agrees (I know all of them' date=' now you have to guess ;D).[/quote'] Is it Barackgan Luisaban or Browa? Glass: This sounds like you just escaped a death sentence or something.*_*You don't know what it's like! Anyway no support from Opal.There are e-mails, IM and so many ways, if you're too lazy/don't want to get them, oh well drink a beer and wait? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Wait you got 50% warning for spamming? Isn't accidentally spam 10% and intentional is 20% or 30%? Depends on the mod and section.Default warnings are set on 20% for mild and 50 for intentional spamming.And then there's spamming and spamming. And flaming and flaming. If that makes any sense.*_* Severity of the spam or flaming' date=' and if they did it multiple times would have been a better explanation, Raven. -.-'=P Even that Super Mod I know agrees (I know all of them' date=' now you have to guess ;D).[/quote'] Is it Barackgan Luisaban or Browa? It's both, and Icy. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.