Jump to content

Get better banning


OMGAKITTY

Recommended Posts

Banned members should be able to access their PM system. As is, a mod can ban someone for x amount of time for whatever stupid reason they feel like. The banned member has no real way to argue his/her case against it.

 

inb4MSN. There are people who do not have/want one, as well as people who have them and don't want to use it for YCM related things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

To clear up, my last ban was because Hunter gave me a 50% warn for "spamming" the Post a pic of your house thread. I posted a pic of the Death Star. Apparently, that's spamming. Maybe I happen to live in a reconstruction of the Death Star. I'm still waiting for Hunter to get back to me on that.

 

/offtopic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To clear up' date=' my last ban was because Hunter gave me a [i']50%[/i] warn for "spamming" the Post a pic of your house thread. I posted a pic of the Death Star. Apparently, that's spamming. Maybe I happen to live in a reconstruction of the Death Star. I'm still waiting for Hunter to get back to me on that.

 

/offtopic.

 

Wait you got 50% warning for spamming?

 

Isn't accidentally spam 10% and intentional is 20% or 30%?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not when it's someone Hunter doesn't like' date=' then it's 50%-Ban.

[/quote']

 

Or in my case, a 70% warn for telling kitty princess that she's a stupid little suck-up (and even though Umbra doesn't even believe it's a warning apparently that stills warrants 30% in Icy's view). Yeah, and I didn't even mention the month ban for posting a thread with a quote that Hunter said on MSN. Even though that was cleared up, the fact that nothing is being done about it and people are still getting ridiculous warnings/bans annoys me. SAVE_US_TSL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not when it's someone Hunter doesn't like' date=' then it's 50%-Ban.

[/quote']

 

Or in my case, a 70% warn for telling kitty princess that she's a stupid little suck-up (and even though Umbra doesn't even believe it's a warning apparently that stills warrants 30% in Icy's view). Yeah, and I didn't even mention the month ban for posting a thread with a quote that Hunter said on MSN. Even though that was cleared up, the fact that nothing is being done about it and people are still getting ridiculous warnings/bans annoys me. SAVE_US_TSL!

 

Isn't that just flamming, why 70% I would expect that for something a lot worse.

 

Why do two mods need to warn you?

 

That just seems a lot more mod abuse then I was expecting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not when it's someone Hunter doesn't like' date=' then it's 50%-Ban.

[/quote']

 

Or in my case, a 70% warn for telling kitty princess that she's a stupid little suck-up (and even though Umbra doesn't even believe it's a warning apparently that stills warrants 30% in Icy's view). Yeah, and I didn't even mention the month ban for posting a thread with a quote that Hunter said on MSN. Even though that was cleared up, the fact that nothing is being done about it and people are still getting ridiculous warnings/bans annoys me. SAVE_US_TSL!

 

Isn't that just flamming, why 70% I would expect that for something a lot worse.

 

Why do two mods need to warn you?

 

That just seems a lot more mod abuse then I was expecting.

 

Why was it 70%? Oh right, because Hunter says he'd rather be a "harsh Mod then a soft one". In other words even glassberry's Guidelines were better.

 

Icy revoked my 70% warning after I spoke to him about it, and replaced it with a 30% one.

 

No, the only Mod 'abuse' right now is really coming from Hunter. Sorry man, but you know it's true. Even that Super Mod I know agrees (I know all of them, now you have to guess ;D). Or Bloodrun, before he was demoted- but that's a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...