Darkest Hour Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 ^ so you say PWWB/R Break are better in this situation huh PWWB/Raigeki Break are better than this card in any situation. Not while running a deck with a few Royal Magical Library for draws. That still ain't a good enough reason to turn this godforsaken card. How? If you activate it at the right time' date=' it can be a -0.[/quote'] Card advantage isn't everything, right? notsureifserious.jpg Not being able to draw vs. Killing their win condition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 I would love to use this when your opponent summons a JD or a DAD xD But in that case Bottomless would be better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 I would love to use this when your opponent summons a JD or a DAD xD But in that case Bottomless would be better When LS spams Royal Decree, for some reason, this card might be considerable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 ^ so you say PWWB/R Break are better in this situation huh PWWB/Raigeki Break are better than this card in any situation. Not while running a deck with a few Royal Magical Library for draws. That still ain't a good enough reason to turn this godforsaken card. How? If you activate it at the right time' date=' it can be a -0.[/quote'] Card advantage isn't everything, right? notsureifserious.jpg Not being able to draw vs. Killing their win condition. Being able to draw by putting a counter of RML and killing their win condition sounds better. But I'll take killing their win at the cost of a draw. Either way, this card has its place in certain decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 I would love to use this when your opponent summons a JD or a DAD xD But in that case Bottomless would be better When LS spams Royal Decree' date=' for some reason, this card might be considerable?[/quote'] twister and MST say hai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zelda_tp_fan Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 If you have a Jar of Greed or something down' date=' you could bypass the Skipped Draw Phase negativity. This card is good.[/quote'] That is still a -1 considering Jars are +0's... Not to mention that it is highly unlikely that you will have them in your hand (Same goes for the reckless idea). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Gideon. Posted October 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Here's a question: does this work like Reckless Greed? Y'know' date=' activate 2+ and skip only 1 draw...[/quote'] yep ^ so you say PWWB/R Break are better in this situation huh PWWB/Raigeki Break are better than this card in any situation. the situation I was talking about is EMPTY HANDPWWB/RB are better than this when it is the ONLY card in your hand, right ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zelda_tp_fan Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Here's a question: does this work like Reckless Greed? Y'know' date=' activate 2+ and skip only 1 draw...[/quote'] yep ^ so you say PWWB/R Break are better in this situation huh PWWB/Raigeki Break are better than this card in any situation. the situation I was talking about is EMPTY HANDPWWB/RB are better than this when it is the ONLY card in your hand' date=' right ?[/quote'] I would still rather get my draw if I have no hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Terrible for everything. Fissure and Smashing exist if your idea is to combo with RML. Bottomless, PWWB, and Raigeki Break exist. Drawing a card and then discarding it is much better then not drawing a card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 run 3 of this, 3 reckless, let your opponent run yata...dont activate reckless together..why would you wanna draw during your draw phase? this card is good if its cost wasnt so big..a draw phase is a draw phase....i'd prefer PWWB over this. Here's a question: does this work like Reckless Greed? Y'know' date=' activate 2+ and skip only 1 draw...[/quote'] yep ^ so you say PWWB/R Break are better in this situation huh PWWB/Raigeki Break are better than this card in any situation. the situation I was talking about is EMPTY HANDPWWB/RB are better than this when it is the ONLY card in your hand' date=' right ?[/quote'] Heart of the Cards Baby!Where's the faith! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zelda_tp_fan Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Lets put it this way: If you have no hand and activate this, you might as well say that you skipped your turn to destroy one monster and you are going to lose anyway... If you have PWWB you still have a chance to topdeck something that will turn the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 ITT : ABSOLOUTLY TERRIBLE PLAYERS!!!! this card is nothing short of terribleanyone that says different is ALSO terribleanyone that dissagrees is also terrible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 This card is absolutly awful and should not see play in anything, anywhere, anytime. Ditching some cards to the Graveyard is absolutly necessary to speed-up the deck's victory conditions, like Mezuki's for Zombies, Treeborn for Monarchs, Rocks to maintain Gaia Plate and some other stuff I missed. And even if you don't have the correct discarding material on hand, it still infinity better than offerings to the doomed, because stuff PWWB and Raigeki Break doesn't funk up your next Draw Phase, while the Draw Phase is absolutly necessary when the game was made public. Now stop thinking not able to draw a card is better than ditching cards to the Graveyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Just run Vortex.Derp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 This is shocking. This must be the first time I've admitted to agreeing with toni. You guys all are horrible for thinking this card is anything but pure toilet paper. I can't think of any realistic situation where this card would be preferable to any other removal I can think of. If you're topdecking and so is your opponent, why would you play this and give them an extra turn on you to get out monsters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 ^ so you say PWWB/R Break are better in this situation huh PWWB/Raigeki Break are better than this card in any situation. You activated Reckless last turn. It's currently your opponent's turn. They activate Royal Decree. This situation's possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 ^ so you say PWWB/R Break are better in this situation huh PWWB/Raigeki Break are better than this card in any situation. You activated Reckless last turn. It's currently your opponent's turn. They activate Royal Decree. This situation's possible. You're screwed pretty much if this situation arises. But, if you had any other card in your hand, it would probably be preferable to this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 what i dont get is why people insist that you can run rml so make up for your missed draw exept the game dosnt work that way does it srsly this thread is ABSOLOUTLY SHOCKING!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Indeed it is. And I don't often aggree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Gideon. Posted October 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 This is shocking. This must be the first time I've admitted to agreeing with toni. You guys all are horrible for thinking this card is anything but pure toilet paper. I can't think of any realistic situation where this card would be preferable to any other removal I can think of. If you're topdecking and so is your opponent' date=' why would you play this and give them an extra turn on you to get out monsters?[/quote'] RECKLESS GREED This card IS good when used in the right timeYou don't ALWAYS use PWWB and discard the card you Want ! You guys are Terribad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zelda_tp_fan Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 This is shocking. This must be the first time I've admitted to agreeing with toni. You guys all are horrible for thinking this card is anything but pure toilet paper. I can't think of any realistic situation where this card would be preferable to any other removal I can think of. If you're topdecking and so is your opponent' date=' why would you play this and give them an extra turn on you to get out monsters?[/quote'] RECKLESS GREED This card IS good when used in the right timeYou don't ALWAYS use PWWB and discard the card you Want ! You guys are Terribad. Your Reckless Greed situation is so ungodly situational that it only makes it suck that much more... If you have 4 cards in your hand there is absolutely no reason you wouldn't be able to play PWWB or R-Break and not have plenty more to do... I mean really, think next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Gideon. Posted October 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 are you dumb or what ?When playing Reckless Greed the most important thing is to keep hand advantagePWWB will destroy your hand, this card will give you a free monster destruction in this situation Think better and don't be dumb my good friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zelda_tp_fan Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 are you dumb or what ?When playing Reckless Greed the most important thing is to keep hand advantagePWWB will destroy your hand' date=' this card will give you a free monster destruction in this situation Think better and don't be dumb my good friend.[/quote'] What are the chances of having three Reckless and this in your hand at the same time... And like I said before, if you already have 4 cards in hand, you probably have plenty of other ways of destroying or getting around a monster... Fissure, Smashing, BTH, Mirror, D-Prison, Soul Taker, and others all give you free monster Destruction without having to give up your draw... There is absolutely no reason to play this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Even with only 1-2 Reckless available to use, this loses it's cost, I'd personally run it in a Deck which ran Reckless most of the time, it's not an awful card and is actually amazing after a RG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zelda_tp_fan Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Even with only 1-2 Reckless available to use' date=' this loses it's cost, I'd personally run it in a Deck which ran Reckless most of the time, it's not an [i']awful[/i] card and is actually amazing after a RG It is an awful card because it is outclassed by tons of things and the only combo with it is a horrible one that is outclassed and harder to pull off than most OTKs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.