jouruichi Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 These cards are my newest work.I've thinken on something really slimy, so i created these cards.Please rate!Help and comment's are welcom!NO SPAM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild C Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 The only thing that I can find to be wrong is the wording on your spell card. If you have either monster in your hand, it would be discarded to the graveyard before it could be summoned to the field, from your hand that is. You may want to reword your card to make it better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 well, I like them(kind of). Wild C is right though, but you can also summon them from your deck. I have an Idea though, make a fusion of those 2. Like 10 star/3000/3000/ once per turn, special summon 1 "Element token Earth/?/?" in attack mode on your side of the field. The tokens attack and DEF is half the ATK and DEF of this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Diviner Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 8/10 extremly good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airojo12 Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul Immortal Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 I don't get the effect of the tokens ATK / DEF. If the Beasts ATK / DEF is halved after then wouldn't the tokens ATK / DEF change also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jemjosher Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HMNISGwahahaha Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 I don't get the effect of the tokens ATK / DEF. If the Beasts ATK / DEF is halved after then wouldn't the tokens ATK / DEF change also? I agree 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 Well, this is how I think it goes:IF you make the token have half of 3000 or the ATK/DEF that the guy has at that moment, AFTER the token gets that ATK/DEF, then the monsters ATK/DEF gets cut in half. like so, guy has 3000 ATK, then makes a token. token gets 1500 ATK because big guy has 3000. Because big guy used that effect, he then loses 1500ATK. it's like the token takes 1500 away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HMNISGwahahaha Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 Well' date=' this is how I think it goes:IF you make the token have half of 3000 or the ATK/DEF that the guy has at that moment, AFTER the token gets that ATK/DEF, then the monsters ATK/DEF gets cut in half. like so, guy has 3000 ATK, then makes a token. token gets 1500 ATK because big guy has 3000. Because big guy used that effect, he then loses 1500ATK. it's like the token takes 1500 away.[/quote']yes, but some rewording would be good and there should be a fusion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 lol the effect like it is now is useless. Everybody wants to keep the complete slime man, why should you split it? Maybe you should just add a little twist, and make a fusion of the TOKENS, not the beasts themselves because then people might perhaps use the effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 lol rrr um, there ok, they are kinda like the swamp battle guards... 8/10 =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RestLess-BoTics Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 Hmmm... pretty cool.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.