Pikachu Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 I'm halfway with the treaty. May I ask how long you want it to be? I might actually be finished by your standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Tim Posted October 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 well since they spammed us 3 times i will let this slip you can spam all you want on their thread today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caine Ghest Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 well since they spammed us 3 times i will let this slip you can spam all you want on their thread today Please give that a shot, I will make sure you are banned so fast your head will spin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Tim Posted October 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 i was just kidding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caine Ghest Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 I really doubt that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Tim Posted October 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 that's nice now get out of my thread you mangy scum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milk-Chan Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 I'm halfway with the treaty. May I ask how long you want it to be? I might actually be finished by your standards. No length requirement. but it should only be as long as it needs to be. Nothing over-the-top is needed. that's nice now get out of my thread you mangy scum Now now Timmothy, did we not already go through this "scum" thing? xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Just wondering why do you want to start something people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caine Ghest Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Resorting to insults, that only proves how ineffective you are at arguments. Oh, and Milk-Chan, my offer for a civilized debate still stands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Resorting to insults' date=' that only proves how ineffective you are at arguments.[/quote'] You can still insult people with the ability to argue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caine Ghest Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Would you kindly elaborate on your point Fighter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Tim Posted October 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 yes i mean insulting is all we have left there is no negging or posting in your thread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caine Ghest Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 You could always argue effectively... I never said you couldn't Neg me, I just said don't instantly neg someone, give them a neutral first as a warning, and no that doesn't mean you can do that to me right now, seeing as I am using a valid form of non-inflammatory speech... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Would you kindly elaborate on your point Fighter? Simply how you put it, if someone insults you they no longer have a point to argue. But I can call you an idiot and still have a good point to back myself up with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caine Ghest Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Then would you please explain how I am as you say an Idiot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milk-Chan Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Pikachu, if you happen to pass by, if you haven't or are already finished, either way I wish to add this; being an amendment or a part of the treaty, that spamming or posting in one another thread will result in a neutral rep from 1 member as a warning, as well as one from your leader. Continued spamming will result in 1, and only 1 negative rep, and 1 for each time you spam again. Is this acceptable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Then would you please explain how I am as you say an Idiot? I was using something as an example, not actually calling you an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caine Ghest Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Well then, you have earned a bit of respect from me Fighter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Well then' date=' you have earned a bit of respect from me Fighter.[/quote'] Okay then, my opinion of you hasn't really changed not saying there was anything bad to start off with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GraveHorizon Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 What has this thread accomplished? (Legitimate question) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Tim Posted October 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 well, well i see that your giving to many chances. a neg would be fit but.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caine Ghest Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Pikachu' date=' if you happen to pass by, if you haven't or are already finished, either way I wish to add this; being an amendment or a part of the treaty, that spamming or [b']posting in one another thread[/b] will result in a neutral rep from 1 member as a warning, as well as one from your leader. Continued spamming will result in 1, and only 1 negative rep, and 1 for each time you spam again. Is this acceptable? Milk-Chan, if I may say something, the bolded statement above should be removed. I have don't nothing to spam this thread, my being here is simply a matter of talking with the members of your group. Which I feel is perfectly allowable in the FTK thread, so long as you aren't spamming it with nonsense. In fact I would like a few of you to post a few valid arguments in our thread, if any of the Knights insult or Neg you I will personally take care of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milk-Chan Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 What has this thread accomplished? (Legitimate question) Well so far we have started our "rebellion" with a few contests' date=' but Majortim, yours is taking a painstakingly long amount of time. I really wish to do something big, like our first "War" against them. There you can have all the flame wars you want*, whilst those who wish may compete in some simple card contests.*I am not promoting flame wars, do these at your own risk. However, I will not be one to report you, so yeah. Pikachu' date=' if you happen to pass by, if you haven't or are already finished, either way I wish to add this; being an amendment or a part of the treaty, that spamming or [b']posting in one another thread[/b] will result in a neutral rep from 1 member as a warning, as well as one from your leader. Continued spamming will result in 1, and only 1 negative rep, and 1 for each time you spam again. Is this acceptable? Milk-Chan, if I may say something, the bolded statement above should be removed. I have don't nothing to spam this thread, my being here is simply a matter of talking with the members of your group. Which I feel is perfectly allowable in the FTK thread, so long as you aren't spamming it with nonsense. In fact I would like a few of you to post a few valid arguments in our thread, if any of the Knights insult or Neg you I will personally take care of them. I can see what you mean. Consider it removed.[spoiler=1st Amendment to the Treaty]that spamming will result in a neutral rep from 1 member as a warning, as well as one from your leader. Continued spamming will result in 1, and only 1 negative rep, and 1 for each time you spam again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Pikachu' date=' if you happen to pass by, if you haven't or are already finished, either way I wish to add this; being an amendment or a part of the treaty, that spamming or [b']posting in one another thread[/b] will result in a neutral rep from 1 member as a warning, as well as one from your leader. Continued spamming will result in 1, and only 1 negative rep, and 1 for each time you spam again. Is this acceptable? Milk-Chan, if I may say something, the bolded statement above should be removed. I have don't nothing to spam this thread, my being here is simply a matter of talking with the members of your group. Which I feel is perfectly allowable in the FTK thread, so long as you aren't spamming it with nonsense. In fact I would like a few of you to post a few valid arguments in our thread, if any of the Knights insult or Neg you I will personally take care of them. Compared to what posts, I saw your thread I am not sure what convos happen over there. O.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milk-Chan Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Hah...I'm going over to see what feedback I get from that "Amemdment"*.*** I say amendment because it may not be an amendment. Maybe not.** I have to stop using these stars xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.