Guest Chaos Pudding Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Relinquished "Relinquished" inflicts effect damage to your opponent whenever you take battle damage from a battle involving "Relinquished"' date=' if it is equipped with a monster. This can occur when “Relinquished” battles another Attack Position Monster, [b']or when it attacks a Defense Position monster with DEF higher than its current ATK.[/b] This ruling doesn't make any sense when you look at the actual card. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 That ruling is wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 That ruling is wrong. But it's Netrep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Well, well I can guess this card may appear again with the new ritual stuff making it more of a nightmare than it was when it first came out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 That ruling is wrong. But it's Netrep. The card only says the battle damage is inflicted to the opponent if it would be destroyed by battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Relinquished is awesome. End of storeh. Ruling is...weird? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Relinquished is fun. Not super great but fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Nothing bad can really come of this ruling. Relinquished deserves any bonus it can get imo. That ruling is wrong. But it's Netrep. The card only says the battle damage is inflicted to the opponent if it would be destroyed by battle. Netrep is always official rulings. Always right. Even if it contradicts what's said on the actual card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vtr47 Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Relinquished is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Konami KNOWS Relinquished will be the meta. So of course they give it a rediculous ruling >___> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 Konami KNOWS Relinquished will be the meta. So of course they give it a rediculous ruling >___> 3 more Sets with SOVR-magnitude Ritual support and it could start posing contention threats. Of course, 3's just an arbitrary number I thought of and this post doesn't make any sense whatsoever, but it sounds nice so let's just roll with it and not point anything out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 Konami KNOWS Relinquished will be the meta. So of course they give it a rediculous ruling >___> 3 more Sets with SOVR-magnitude Ritual support and it could start posing contention threats. Of course' date=' 3's just an arbitrary number I thought of and this post doesn't make any sense whatsoever, but it sounds nice so let's just roll with it and not point anything out.[/quote'] Its simple: I posted it from my PSP/I was somewhat lazy.But now that I actualy re-re-read the card, Hikaru's mentioned ruling actually makes Relinquished pretty lulzy.So yes, my comment actually does make sence now. Since Konami has this "Diabalogical Mastr Plan"(not thats its bad) of theres, where they try to make Ritural monsters/Relinquish, be a Meta-worthy deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombiepromking Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 So it inflicts damage if you would have taken damage? I really don't understand that ruling. Relinquished is still one of the only rituals that is absolutely worth using. Pegasus's only good card IMO. (You can't count Restricted.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Von Csent Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 The ruling is, as far as I can tell, an impossible condition to fulfill. Relinquished deals the burn if the controller of it would take battle damage and if Relinquished would be destroyed by the battle while equipped with a monster . As I recall, there is no condition under which a monster attacking a defense monster will be destroyed by battle against the defense monster, so the ruling will never apply. On paper, the ruling makes 100% sense. In practice, it changes nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 I am going to break Relinquished when SOVR comes out. I'm going to break it so good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Gideon. Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 This was a pain in the a** when it first came out. And now that we will have all those ritual support cards, this might see some play again.Good that I still have 3 of it o.O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 I found your problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Von Csent Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 I found your problem Wouldn't it count as Relinquished being destroyed by an effect? That technically is not "destroyed by battle." If Giant Axe Mummy does indeed count as destroying Relinquished by battle though, the way Relinquished is worded, the burn damage would be dealt even without the ruling. Examining the ruling closer, I realized that my prior statement about it not making a difference may be incorrect. Apparently, Relinquished does damage whether the equipped monster is destroyed or not. It sounds like Relinquished's printed effect is completely replaced by this ruling, essentially an erratum. This makes Relinquished better than it used to be, but the correction should be formalized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff! Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 So, while equipped, Reliquished has a permanent Dimesnion Wall? Hell yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Von Csent Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 So' date=' while equipped, Reliquished has a permanent Dimesnion Wall? Hell yes.[/quote'] Well, kind of. You take the damage still too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 So with Grinder Golem, you Tribute 2 of their Monsters to get him on their side of the field. Activate Preperations for the Ritual to get Reli and Ritual. Offer 1 of the Grinder Tokens for the Ritual Summon. Equip Grinder Golem to Relinquished? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Reli: I steal your stardustOpponent: Lighting VortexReli: use Stardust effectOpponent: attackReli: Threating RoarOpponent: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Von Csent Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Stardust is no longer a monster. Its effect cannot be used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 Reli: I steal your stardustOpponent: Lighting VortexReli: use Stardust effectOpponent: you can't do that' date=' nub.Judge: GAME LOSS!Reli:[img']http://fc01.deviantart.com/fs10/i/2006/114/8/5/Meet_Fred_by_Neoshadow212.gif[/img] Fix'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 probally 1 of the best 0 atk/def monsters there is. nuff said. this + anything with 3000+ atk = big pain for your opponent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.