Archelaus Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Still he has a good sentence or two' date=' so, well..., I think the warning was too extreme.[/quote'] It could have been, instead of Permanent, prolonged Warning. Yeah, it's longer but at least it is temporary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitty Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Both Icy and Ragnorak are perverse. Icy shouldn't have gave that permenent warning, it shoulda been temporary.Ragnorak shouldn't have said thinks to Icy to upset him To fix this problem, Icy should change the warning to temporary but a rule be made than Rangorak and every other member of the forum can only post in 1 thread no more than 4 to 5 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 so we got a new rule thanks to ragnarok ? No thx! its fine like so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoopla Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Both Icy and Ragnorak are perverse. Icy shouldn't have gave that permenent warning' date=' it shoulda been temporary.Ragnorak shouldn't have said thinks to Icy to upset him To fix this problem, Icy should change the warning to temporary but a rule be made than Rangorak and every other member of the forum can only post in 1 thread no more than 4 to 5 times.[/quote'] Well technically it's not permanent if Icy plans to remove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Both Icy and Ragnorak are perverse. Icy shouldn't have gave that permenent warning' date=' it shoulda been temporary.Ragnorak shouldn't have said thinks to Icy to upset him To fix this problem, Icy should change the warning to temporary but a rule be made than Rangorak and every other member of the forum can only post in 1 thread no more than 4 to 5 times.[/quote'] Posting more than once in the same Thread wasn't the problem Icy was talking about. He said that Ragnarok posted in every thread that it was like he was flooding. But, I disagree with Icy and his perma warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitty Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 No this New rule should've been made a while ago. But it should only be Used in the CC section only. Because there alot of other members who post alot to not just Ragnorak. So this proposal rule is only a rough draft, I don't expect it to be made serious by the mods, it's just my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 A Rule that limits a member's posts in a single thread. It could work but still, sometimes it would be a bit troublesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 its a stupid rule -.-'(no offense) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lily Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 No this New rule should've been made a while ago. But it should only be Used in the CC section only. Because there alot of other members who post alot to not just Ragnorak. So this proposal rule is only a rough draft' date=' I don't expect it to be made serious by the mods, it's just my opinion[/quote'] It's a bad rule, as devoted people to card sets that are always getting updated would have to post only 4 times and then have to stop giving there opinions. It would be heartbreaking to both the owner and the person who wanted to post there opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitty Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Meh i admit it has it troubles but then, it would minumize the so called "Intentional Spamming" But like i said it's only a rough thought, I'll discuss it with a mod and see how it goes. I really don't expect it to go through, but i was just thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 No, it just wouldn't work out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 its a stupid rule -.-'(no offense) It's still a Draft Idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 I feel sorry for Rag. That's all I have to say. FUN FACT TIME!:ragnarok1945 has NEVER POSTED A THREAD IN HIS ENTIRE TIME ON YCM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 No this New rule should've been made a while ago. But it should only be Used in the CC section only. Because there alot of other members who post alot to not just Ragnorak. So this proposal rule is only a rough draft' date=' I don't expect it to be made serious by the mods, it's just my opinion[/quote'] Such a thing would form more loopholes than not.It shall remain a case-by-case thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 And what about the one-post-a-minute idea, Icy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 1 minute is longer than you think..i think 30 seconds would be enough..! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 1 minute is longer than you think..i think 30 seconds would be enough..! Then you're dumber than you look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archie17 Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Well you can only run searches every 30 seconds, so I think that rule should match up with posting here in this speicific section. "You can only post every 30 seconds in this section." I just started a lore for this very Thread section, so it has begun :p. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitty Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Well you can only run searches every 30 seconds' date=' so I think that rule should match up with posting here in this speicific section. "You can only post every 30 seconds in this section." I just started a lore for this very Thread section, so it has begun :p.[/quote'] Hmm could work... but then again I somehow get this funny image of people actually sitting at their computer for 30 seconds counting then post again and do it again and i lol at this image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archie17 Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Well you can only run searches every 30 seconds' date=' so I think that rule should match up with posting here in this speicific section. "You can only post every 30 seconds in this section." I just started a lore for this very Thread section, so it has begun :p.[/quote'] Hmm could work... but then again I somehow get this funny image of people actually sitting at their computer for 30 seconds counting then post again and do it again and i lol at this image. Well that is what I do with searches :P, but it really would keep things in check by reducing the amount of posts someone is willing to do at any given time because of that limit. I only think its appropriate for this section, because its the one with the most traffic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoopla Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 I hate forums that have time limit between each post. Moderators just need to keep members aware of their posting habits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted October 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Well you can only run searches every 30 seconds' date=' so I think that rule should match up with posting here in this speicific section. "You can only post every 30 seconds in this section." I just started a lore for this very Thread section, so it has begun :p.[/quote'] Hmm could work... but then again I somehow get this funny image of people actually sitting at their computer for 30 seconds counting then post again and do it again and i lol at this image. Well that is what I do with searches :P, but it really would keep things in check by reducing the amount of posts someone is willing to do at any given time because of that limit. I only think its appropriate for this section, because its the one with the most traffic. that is a good idea. in Custom Cards only ahve a 30-40 Second between post period. someone post that in Suggestions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 I think a minute would be better. But thats me. I don't post to much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Play Runescape and take intervals between playing the game and posting on the forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted October 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2009 i do that sometimes. play a game. play it for a while. pause it and post here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.