Lt.T.Peck-Face- Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Im confused about its effect. It says: This card does not take any Battle Damage and cannot be destroyed by battle with an EARTH, WATER, FIRE, WIND, or DARK monster. and: (Battle Damage is still inflicted to players.) Isent this a contradiction? Can someone please explain it to me (with an example maby)? Thnx Alot!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Post in this thread next time. And where did you get that ruling from? EDIT:Oic, it says that on the card. Well, nobody knows why. Konami was just being vague, like they always are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 "Five-Headed Dragon" protects itself from being destroyed in battle against monsters with the specified Attributes' date=' but it does nothing to protect the Life Points of the player controlling it or their opponent. Battle Damage is still inflicted to players[/quote'] It's probably an old OCG thing. Essentially, it cannot be destroyed by battle, end of story, but it does not stop battle dmg like Blackwing Armor Master's effect does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 It's a pretty useless effect since realistically nothing is going to get over 5000 attack, the opp will just use some destruction effect to get rid of it. The only situation I can think of where something might actually have higher attack in this metagame is a pumped Bora. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 It's a pretty useless effect since realistically nothing is going to get over 5000 attack' date=' the opp will just use some destruction effect to get rid of it. The only situation I can think of where something might actually have higher attack in this metagame is a pumped Bora.[/quote'] And not a pumped Sirocco? >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Well, there's always Honest, but it's for LIGHTs anyway so it's sorta irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 It's a pretty useless effect since realistically nothing is going to get over 5000 attack' date=' the opp will just use some destruction effect to get rid of it. The only situation I can think of where something might actually have higher attack in this metagame is a pumped Bora.[/quote'] And not a pumped Sirocco? >_>Shining flare wingman + 9 e-heros in grave >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Judgment Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Because it's old OCG. It simply means that its atk can't be lowered by those monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 It's a pretty useless effect since realistically nothing is going to get over 5000 attack' date=' the opp will just use some destruction effect to get rid of it. The only situation I can think of where something might actually have higher attack in this metagame is a pumped Bora.[/quote'] And not a pumped Sirocco? >_>Shining flare wingman + 9 e-heros in grave >.> in this metagame >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Its just Konami being a dick >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Im confused about its effect. It says: This card does not take any Battle Damage and cannot be destroyed by battle with an EARTH' date=' WATER, FIRE, WIND, or DARK monster. and: (Battle Damage is still inflicted to players.) Isent this a contradiction? Can someone please explain it to me (with an example maby)? Thnx Alot!!![/quote'] No, it's not a contradiction. Although it can't be destroyed by anything other than LIGHT, players will still receive damage. Not like Fortress Warrior/Blackwing Armor Master, which cannot be destroyed AND reduce damage to 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Its just Konami being a dick >_> LOL at it saying "You take no battle damage from battles involving this card" and later "(Damage calculation is applied normally.)" Obviously it isn't with Fortress Warrior. On topic: with FGD, you'll still take the damage, but unless the monster it battles is LIGHT, it won't be destroyed in the battle.Most people would destroy it with an effect or an Honested LIGHT monster anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.