Enjelus Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 I'm looking for an alternative to DNA transplant that would change only my monster's attribute or something that would block it's effect on my opponent. Does such a card exist or am I wasting my time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Sure, I've got just the thing. It only works on one monster, but it should be able to do the job. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Still sounds like a waste of time tbh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Just make a deck of all the same attrib. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Well, we don't really know why he's asking the question. For all we know it's so that he could avoid looking unoriginal in the Custom Cards section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Well' date=' we don't really know why he's asking the question. For all we know it's so that he could avoid looking unoriginal in the Custom Cards section.[/quote'] Only if you completely ignore the content of his post. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xazeon Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Just make a deck of all the same attrib.Did you actually encourage him to make a bad deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Just make a deck of all the same attrib.Did you actually encourage him to make a bad deck? Did you actually consider Lightsworn, Hopeless Dragon, TeleDark and Blackwings "bad decks"? Heck, to be even less specific, did you actually consider a deck type that had working synergy with it's own cards and wasn't just a cluster**** and random pile of cards to be "bad"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Best monster for what your looking for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enjelus Posted September 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 The reason is that my deck was a Dark Dragon deck but now its more of a Fire/Dark Dragon Deck and Mystic Plasma Zone doesn't work so well anymore (and mountain is only 200 atk). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 The reason is that my deck was a Dark Dragon deck but now its more of a Fire/Dark Dragon Deck and Mystic Plasma Zone doesn't work so well anymore (and mountain is only 200 atk). Use Burden of the Mighty instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enjelus Posted September 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Use Burden of the Mighty instead. :shock: I didn't even think of that, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Just make a deck of all the same attrib.Did you actually encourage him to make a bad deck? Did you actually consider Lightsworn' date=' [u']Hopeless Dragon[/u], TeleDark and Blackwings "bad decks"? That's great, his hopeless deck, to have a hopeless dragon. That's great... Heck' date=' to be even less specific, did you actually consider a deck type that had working synergy with it's own cards and wasn't just a cluster**** and random pile of cards to be "bad"?[/quote'] Hey! I used that type deck when I was 1 year old. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Hey! I used that type deck when I was 1 year old. xD I was gonna insult you, by saying that since the game was 10 years old, that meant you were just an stupid 11 year old, but after I clicked on your profile and saw that you WERE 11, I feel the joke would be unjustified, so I wrote this post instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 errallure of darkness, the dark creator, dad, and honest.only reason to run same type deck.i might be missing one thoughits synergy chief. [/troll] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Well' date=' we don't really know why he's asking the question. For all we know it's so that he could avoid looking unoriginal in the Custom Cards section.[/quote'] Only if you completely ignore the content of his post. <_< Um, not really? =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xazeon Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Just make a deck of all the same attrib.Did you actually encourage him to make a bad deck? Did you actually consider Lightsworn' date=' Hopeless Dragon, TeleDark and Blackwings "bad decks"? Heck, to be even less specific, did you actually consider a deck type that had working synergy with it's own cards and wasn't just a cluster**** and random pile of cards to be "bad"?[/quote']I thought you were refering to a deck like this: http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-156626.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Well' date=' we don't really know why he's asking the question. For all we know it's so that he could avoid looking unoriginal in the Custom Cards section.[/quote'] Only if you completely ignore the content of his post. <_< Um, not really? =/ Except you'd either have to be taking English as a second language or have barely skimmed his post to not have arrived at the conclusion that he was looking for a card for his deck. And before you turn this into a big 'no u' contest, I'd like to point out that statements such as 'I'm looking for an alternative to [Card's Name]' and 'or am I wasting my time' greatly seem to imply that he is hopeful that the card exists, so that he may add it to his deck, not that he is hopeful the card does not exist, so he can appear original, especially as he's already seemed to acknowledge similar cards, such as 'DNA Transplant' I thought you were refering to a deck like this: http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-156626.html Why the bugger would I possibly be referring to something like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Well' date=' we don't really know why he's asking the question. For all we know it's so that he could avoid looking unoriginal in the Custom Cards section.[/quote'] Only if you completely ignore the content of his post. <_< Um, not really? =/ Except you'd either have to be taking English as a second language or have barely skimmed his post to not have arrived at the conclusion that he was looking for a card for his deck. And before you turn this into a big 'no u' contest, I'd like to point out that statements such as 'I'm looking for an alternative to [Card's Name]' and 'or am I wasting my time' greatly seem to imply that he is hopeful that the card exists, so that he may add it to his deck, not that he is hopeful the card does not exist, so he can appear original, especially as he's already seemed to acknowledge similar cards, such as 'DNA Transplant' "For all we know" can be used for anything that's possible, no matter how unlikely. In fact, it's often used for the unlikely for satirical purposes. For example, if I were to say "For all we know, he's actually never played the game and just posted the thread for kicks after seeing a copy of "DNA Transplant", and this thread is perfectly reasonable", it'd still have been perfectly legit. Maybe a better example would be something unrelated, like if some guy were to post "Do you have many orange-haired acquaintances" and some other person posted "This topic is stupid", it's perfectly legit for the next guy to post "Hey guys, for all we know he's hunting down Rick Astley to prevent the upcoming apocalypse". No rocket science that to go to such lengths to not look original for such a simple, obvious effect isn't done, or at least wouldn't make much sense were it to be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Arguing semantics is a sure fire sign that you've ran out of things to say and concede your argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Sure' date=' I've got just the thing. It only works on one monster, but it should be able to do the job. ;D [img']http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/yugioh/images/e/e8/ScrollofBewitchmentLON-EN-C.jpg[/img] This^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Arguing semantics is a sure fire sign that you've ran out of things to say and concede your argument. Where do these arbitrary argument laws come from? >_> So I could just read the above as "HAHAHAHAHAHAHA DICK DICK DICK HAHAHAHAHA", and if you make any objections you'd have "ran out of things to say and concede your argument?" That's retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 I'm saying when you have to change the initial terms of what you're arguing, it's a surefire sign that you've already lost the initial argument. If you feel like arguing with someone about semantics, kindly do it on your own time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Let's take a look at the basis of this entire argument. Only if you completely ignore the content of his post. <_< No changes of terms have been made, it's been semantics all along. You misinterpreted my post as a misinterpretation of the original post, I stated my case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Hey! I used that type deck when I was 1 year old. xD I was gonna insult you' date=' by saying that since the game was 10 years old, that meant you were just an stupid 11 year old, but after I clicked on your profile and saw that you WERE 11, I feel the joke would be unjustified, so I wrote this post instead.[/quote'] It's a joke. God people are stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.