Azuh Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Konami is doing this so its easier for them to make banlists IMO I just don't get why they keep releasing support for more overpowered decktypes anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.F.Yuji Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 ^Agreed, they need Support for the older cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Hopefully, some more crystal beasts, and cloudians will show up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Konami is doing this so its easier for them to make banlists IMO I just don't get why they keep releasing support for more overpowered decktypes anyways Because Konami is here to give support and kick the meta's but. And Konami is all out of support. Hopefully' date=' some more crystal beasts, and cloudians will show up[/quote']According to Konami, Crystal Beasts, Cloudians, Batteryman, Ancient Gear, Aliens, Harpie, etc, all died Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Hopefully' date=' some more crystal beasts, and cloudians will show up[/quote']According to Konami, Crystal Beasts, Cloudians, Batteryman, Ancient Gear, Aliens, Harpie, etc, all died Don't forget venoms, they were dead in one pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombiepromking Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Venom, Aliens, Cloudians and Batterymen need to come back. Batterymen just needs a bit more support and maybe a new beatstick. Cloudians need a better boss monster but, cloudians are good for the fact that there are several builds for them; though they do need to come back. Venom needs much more to it. Aliens are still doing okay but, they need more synchs and tuners. Cloudians and Aliens are the only two types that were ready for synchs before they came out; they both need more synchs and tuners though, with a bit of archetype specific quick synch support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 According to Konami' date=' Crystal Beasts, Cloudians, Batteryman, Ancient Gear, Aliens, Harpie, etc, all died[/quote']Aliens aren't really dead. We've still been getting cards for them and over all they are a decent archtype. But yea I agree, we need stuff for older archtypes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 According to Konami' date=' Crystal Beasts, Cloudians, Batteryman, Ancient Gear, Aliens, Harpie, etc, all died[/quote']Aliens aren't really dead. We've still been getting cards for them and over all they are a decent archtype. But yea I agree, we need stuff for older archtypes. first time i heard someone say aliens were decent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rise of the Eldrazi Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 first time i heard someone say aliens were decent I run Aliens and they are decent. AMMONITE POWAH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 I had an alien deck once, it was badass, even before CRMS came out. Unfortunely it was stolen about 1 week before CRMS came out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Not only are they trying to make it a single deck format, they are failing badly at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Konami is a piece of sheet. They are making a mistake trying to ruin Lightsworn, because all we will be left with is Gladiator Beasts and their other shitty archetypes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Konami is a piece of s***. They are making a mistake trying to ruin Lightsworn' date=' because all we will be left with is Gladiator Beasts and their other shitty archetypes.[/quote'] How are they trying to ruin lightsworn, they have been doing nothing but trying to make them succeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Konami is a piece of s***. They are making a mistake trying to ruin Lightsworn' date=' because all we will be left with is Gladiator Beasts and their other shitty archetypes.[/quote'] How are they trying to ruin lightsworn, they have been doing nothing but trying to make them succeed.I meant in the Future, when they release some other new money archetype and go "owait, LS trumps it because we made them too good" and Banhammers it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 LS just lost the jump and was completely stomped by a multitude of more unique decks. And people dislike LS because it is based on lucksacking rather than skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 LS just lost the jump and was completely stomped by a multitude of more unique decks. And people dislike LS because it is based on lucksacking rather than skill.the Basis of Yugioh by itself is lucksack, because youhavetodrawcardslol. and Lucksacking > Skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Yes, you are right. Because there is a luck aspect, we should clearly try to expand that as much as possible and de-emphasize all things relating to actually playing well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Yes' date=' you are right. Because there is a luck aspect, we should clearly try to expand that as much as possible and de-emphasize all things relating to actually playing well.[/quote'] *facepalm* If everyone was based on skill and have no luck involved then there would be no point in shuffling the deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 I'm sorry, I did not realize you have such problems with reading comprehension. In the future I will take your unique disability (or is it "alter-ability" now) into account and remember that not everyone was created with the brain-power to understand obviously stated points. All decks have a luck aspect and a skill aspect. LS happens to have a ridiculously high luck factor and an unfathomably low skill factor. Thus, if you lose to LS it will almost never be because they were better than you, but because the god of yugimonz decided that they, the rich men, should be gifted with the ability to win duels without actually trying. The skill in LS basically amounts to "knowing enough not to deck out". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowferret Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Lightsworns... kinda suck, actually. -.-Book Of Eclipse loves Lightsworn monsters. But, meh, I kinda like seeing all the LS stuff being remade cheaper. It gives me and my friends a better chance to finish Bryant's LS deck, and I get to laugh at all the people who spent hundreds of dollars buying their decks. [/spite] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted September 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Well, LS might not have won the SJC, but they sure took up most of the places in the Top 16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Well' date=' LS might not have won the SJC, but they sure took up most of the places in the Top 16.[/quote']Yeah, but then they dropped dropped like flies and lost all those spaces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Well' date=' LS might not have won the SJC, but they sure took up most of the places in the Top 16.[/quote']Yeah, but then they dropped dropped like flies and lost all those spaces. That's because they were all paired up against eachother. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Well' date=' LS might not have won the SJC, but they sure took up most of the places in the Top 16.[/quote']Yeah, but then they dropped dropped like flies and lost all those spaces. That's because they were all paired up against eachother. =/ No, they weren't. Nearly every "other" deck that made the top 8, was paired against an LS in the top 16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted September 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Well' date=' LS might not have won the SJC, but they sure took up most of the places in the Top 16.[/quote']Yeah, but then they dropped dropped like flies and lost all those spaces. That's because they were all paired up against eachother. =/ No, they weren't. Nearly every "other" deck that made the top 8, was paired against an LS in the top 16. But they were still the most prevalent deck type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.