DesCrow Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Whirlwing = 1Gale = 2Me = Happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Whirlwing = 1Gale = 2Me = Happy All cards I don't like = 0Me = happy too This one's crazy; he runs over all my defences! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 its limited for a reason' date=' whats to discuss[/quote'] Not really, they should've just banned Black Whirlwind and left it at three. =/ No, no, no! Ban = NoLeft it at 3? = No It's okay for a Anti-Dragon Deck. Dragon = High attackHigh Attack + this = ATK FAIL. Um, what? Gale should be at 1 and Black Whirlwind shouldn't be banned because Gale's "good anti-Dragon?" >_> Dragons are tier 0 Failgons are tier 0. Good REDRUM Horus Spam is Tier 3 at worst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xazeon Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Whirlwing = 1Gale = 2Me = HappyWhirlwind @2 and Gale @2 would make me happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Nigro whirlwind is a rota on crack, it should be at 0 or at the very least 1.Gale is easily searchible by tomato, whirlwind, swallows nest, Shura, and sangan. Allurable. Dark Eruption target. can beat any monster with 2550 or less, or weakens big monsters with no cost. Tuner.level 3.Dark. hmmmm and tell me why should he be at 3? just because u traded out the butt for a playset? or u got tons and didnt sell them off when the going was good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 ITT : good card = bannable in all honesty, im very 2 sided about this card as you can splash 3 in any deck, but its really not a game winner i think whirlwind shoul dhave went to 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 ITT : good card = bannable in all honesty' date=' im very 2 sided about this card as you can splash 3 in any deck, but its really not a game winner i think whirlwind shoul dhave went to 0[/quote'] u sir are and idiot.limited and unrestricted = b& Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightningRave Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 Nigro whirlwind is a rota on crack' date=' it should be at 0 or at the very least 1.Gale is easily searchible by tomato, whirlwind, swallows nest, Shura, sangan, and [b']Sphere of Chaos[/b]. Allurable. Dark Eruption target. can beat any monster with 2550 or less, or weakens big monsters with no cost. Tuner.level 3.Dark. You forgot one. :p Anyway being at 1 is just fine by me. This card is better than shrink since it halves the current attack, not just original attack, and has many resources to get this card and use this card. Not to mention you can re-use this effect next turn if for some reason it wasn't destroyed or you didn't tune it for a synchro. Not to mention Gale isn't affected by Gravity Bind or Level Limit Area-B. This is just one of those cards that can go in nearly every deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 Ban = NoLeft it at 3? = Nowhat is this i dont even Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 Gale isn't THAT powerful. Black Whirlwind is a rather annoying card though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 its limited for a reason' date=' whats to discuss[/quote'] Not really, they should've just banned Black Whirlwind and left it at three. =/ No, no, no! Ban = NoLeft it at 3? = No It's okay for a Anti-Dragon Deck. Dragon = High attackHigh Attack + this = ATK FAIL. Um, what? Gale should be at 1 and Black Whirlwind shouldn't be banned because Gale's "good anti-Dragon?" >_> Dragons are tier 0 Failgons are tier 0. Good REDRUM Horus Spam is Tier 3 at worst. Tier? What is a tier? No rly. What is a tier? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesirson Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 Yea, srsly, WTF is that thing supposed to look like!? He looks like the ugly duckling IMO. Anyway I hate to face him, he's evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 Yea' date=' srsly, WTF is that thing supposed to look like!? He looks like the ugly duckling IMO. Anyway I hate to face him, he's evil.[/quote']He's the bird that likes to f*** people up. And he's smexy and you know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Yea' date=' srsly, WTF is that thing supposed to look like!? He looks like the ugly duckling IMO. Anyway I hate to face him, he's evil.[/quote']He's the bird that likes to f*** people up. And he's smexy and you know it. I guess so since it stares into your soul to then steal it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Gale is limited not because of it's pwnage effect, it's limited because of it's splashablility with it's pwnage effect. Whirlwind should be limited soully because having more than one on the field is just... pwnage doesn't cover it. Ban? I don't think so. Yeah it's cheap and annoying, but without even one the entire deck is dead... Anyways, Gale at 1 seems a bit much, but understandable. Whirlwind untouched... Failnomi fails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Shrink in legs? Not exactly - for one, its effect isn't multitrigger. Splashable? Its relative weakness - statwise - would deter play in decks other than Blackwings. That much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 its limited for a reason' date=' whats to discuss[/quote'] Not really, they should've just banned Black Whirlwind and left it at three. =/ No, no, no! Ban = NoLeft it at 3? = No It's okay for a Anti-Dragon Deck. Dragon = High attackHigh Attack + this = ATK FAIL. Um, what? Gale should be at 1 and Black Whirlwind shouldn't be banned because Gale's "good anti-Dragon?" >_> Dragons are tier 0 Failgons are tier 0. Good REDRUM Horus Spam is Tier 3 at worst. Tier? What is a tier? No rly. What is a tier?Something that runs down your face when you cry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Apparently nobody wants this card =/ I'm selling it on ebay for a penny and I've got no takers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Apparently nobody wants this card =/ I'm selling it on ebay for a penny and I've got no takers... Nobody wants to buy normal rare cards on the interwebs. Especially from Ebay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Apparently nobody wants this card =/ I'm selling it on ebay for a penny and I've got no takers... Nobody wants to buy normal rare cards on the interwebs. Especially from Ebay.I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 its limited for a reason' date=' whats to discuss[/quote'] Not really, they should've just banned Black Whirlwind and left it at three. =/ No, no, no! Ban = NoLeft it at 3? = No It's okay for a Anti-Dragon Deck. Dragon = High attackHigh Attack + this = ATK FAIL. Um, what? Gale should be at 1 and Black Whirlwind shouldn't be banned because Gale's "good anti-Dragon?" >_> Dragons are tier 0 Stupid post. A Decktype being good doesn't mean certain cards should be banned because they inconvenience it. Dragons made a fluke appearance in Ireland, but they still got trumped by LS and are still Tier 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Shrink in legs? Not exactly - for one' date=' its effect isn't multitrigger. Splashable? Its relative weakness - statwise - would deter play in decks other than Blackwings. That much.[/quote'] Summon => Shrink => Synchro = Profit, and since it's lvl 3, it's even more useable =/ Who cares if it's weak in stats? It isn't used for it's stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesCrow Posted September 23, 2009 Report Share Posted September 23, 2009 Yo Gale, your effect is broken and everything, and I'ma let you finish, but Sangan is the most splashable monster right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 24, 2009 Report Share Posted September 24, 2009 Poorsworn vs. Blackwings. I got pwned by not nuking the field when there was ONLY a Black Whirlwind out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.