HORUS Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 so basically right now this deck is total crap and needs help. MONSTERS: 2 Raiza the Storm Monarch3 Thestalos the Firestorm Monarch2 Mobius the Frost Monarch2 Cyber Dragon 1 Breaker the Magical Warrior3 Hydrogeddon3 Mystic Tomato1 Sangan1 Snipe Hunter1 Spirit Reaper1 Treeborn Frog1 Magician of Faith SPELLS 1 MST1 Heavy Storm1 Pot of Avarice1 Brain Control2 Soul Exchange2 Enemy Controller2 Nobleman of Crossout2 Shrink1 Scapegoat1 Premature TRAPS 1 Mirror Force1 Torrential Tribute1 Bottomless Trap Hole1 Call of the Haunted2 Sakuretsu Armor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry OldMaster Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 Like Master Sartorius said, Reincarnation can be better then everything.... but your choise. I don't get any.....um.... hamster from Monarch, but since when does a duelist prefer hand destruction over field destruction? And Shrink + Hydrogeddon = ownage. More ownage then Sak + Hydrogeddon. I still prefer Nobleman above Shield Crush. Yes-yes.Cuz how many times when plaing this Deck you could get a face-up Defence monster?Almost no one does that, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God GAK Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 You are wrong hamster. Sometimes your opponent summons a monster and changes to defense when he cannot attack. Or you could attack the face-down monster, and if it's not destroyed BAM! HERE goes shield crush. Also you coulld use Controller to change it to defense mode Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry OldMaster Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 ^ Controller adds the point I missed, thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God GAK Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 You are welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tearbleu Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 put in Zaborg =) the last monarch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted November 25, 2007 Report Share Posted November 25, 2007 I don't get any.....um.... hamster from Monarch' date=' but since when does a duelist prefer hand destruction over field destruction? [/quote'] quite simple, hand destruction it's more useful, based on the amount of card on your opponent's hand you can calculate how many chances has your opponent to regain advantage on you... with 1 or no card on the hand, your opponent depends on what he/she draws... so it strongly reduces the chances of winning... cards on the field barely last for 3 or 4 turns, but on the hand you can keep cards a lot of turns until they're neccesary... now you got it?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted November 25, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 25, 2007 okay so i took more time and remade the deck so its edited now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted November 25, 2007 Report Share Posted November 25, 2007 Doesn't really seem like an aggro deck. It just doesn't have that feel. Looks more like a CC deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viera~Fran Posted November 25, 2007 Report Share Posted November 25, 2007 What!? You said this deck needs help!? It looks really good to me! The only thing I would suggest is taking out a Mobius for a Raiza or Zaborg. Also, since you use the Soul Exchanges, it could be nice to play 1 or 2 Jinzo's in the deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted November 25, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 25, 2007 yeah once i get a third Raiza i will be replacing 1 Mobius with Raiza. i dont know about Jinzo tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted November 27, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 BUMP I NEED ADVICE CHILDREN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegargoylevine Posted November 27, 2007 Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 Like your not a child yourself. +1 Raiza is Obvious and so is +1 Cyber Dragon. I would swap the Tomato box for a Rat box, because they are more aggro and you aren't using Apprentice. 2 Pot of Avarice is also a good idea, that or add Gigantes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted November 27, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 i have been trying to get a third Raiza and a third CyDra. i could try rat box. and i know i'll need another avarice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegargoylevine Posted November 27, 2007 Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 +1 Raiza+1 Cyber Dragon+3 Giant Rat+3 Exiled Force+2 or 3 Injection Fairy Lily+1 Card Trooper (What where you thinking!)+3? Gigantes (I personally would)+1? Book of Moon (It's very good) -3 Mystic Tomato-1 Bottomless Trap Hole-2 Sakurestu Armor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted November 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2007 okay i'll try that. i have all the cards minus the Raiza and Cydra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted November 28, 2007 Report Share Posted November 28, 2007 i don't think 3 gigantes would do good... let's make them 2... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted November 29, 2007 Report Share Posted November 29, 2007 Kramer, I may get massive amounts of Cydras. I will let you know. Take out bottomless, doesnt hit gadgets and monarchs still get effects, Deck Marshy Instead, it is fluffier (and that is my excuse, and that bottomless isn't as effective as a tribute + 1k Damage. Also, no worries for Raiza, Torrential Does wonders to him) If the oppurtunity arises, Saks out for widespreads. -1 Nobleman+1 DDWL. Obvious? Lol There you go. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.