Great Unclean One: VK Posted September 2, 2009 Report Share Posted September 2, 2009 Think, Ninjas and Pirates are both not bound by honor, but what happens if we do? Personally, I think Samurais will win, they got on silk and bamboo armor that gives them speed and agility. Not to mention steel katanas. Sure knights will ether have steel chainmail or steel platemails, but it still aint enough to protect them from a katana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Think' date=' Ninjas and Pirates are both not bound by honor, but what happens if we do? Personally, I think Samurais will win, they got on silk and bamboo armor that gives them speed and agility. Not to mention steel katanas. Sure knights will ether have steel chainmail or steel platemails, but it still aint enough to protect them from a katana.[/quote'] Samurai wore steel armor. Knights were mounted. Knights would have won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CeDeFiA Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Think' date=' Ninjas and Pirates are both not bound by honor, but what happens if we do? Personally, I think Samurais will win, they got on silk and bamboo armor that gives them speed and agility. Not to mention steel katanas. Sure knights will ether have steel chainmail or steel platemails, but it still aint enough to protect them from a katana.[/quote'] Samurai wore steel armor. Knights were mounted. Knights would have won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted September 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 wait, they wore steel armor? hmmm. Then where did i read that they wore silk armor? ahh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Silk and bamboo armor wouldn't protect you from anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Silk and bamboo armor wouldn't protect you from anything. Well I guess it would protect you from a small child...with a limp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Metal Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Spartans beat them both and all they wear is a cloth to cover their junk and a cheap bronze (or whatever it's made of) chestplate. I think they have shields, swords, spears, and leggings too but I heard that they just eat their opponents so I don't see why they would need those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 The Katana is made not from steel, but from a pure metal made in Japan. There, it is molded, painted, and smoothed. It can cut through steel armor, is way more lighter than a knight's sword and has a beautiful shape. Samurai's win. Screw the horses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Spartans beat them both and all they wear is a cloth to cover their junk and a cheap bronze (or whatever it's made of) chestplate. I think they have shields' date=' swords, spears, and leggings too but I heard that they just eat their opponents so I don't see why they would need those.[/quote'] This is madness! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 The Katana is made not from steel' date=' but from a pure metal made in Japan. There, it is molded, painted, and smoothed. It can cut through steel armor, is way more lighter than a knight's sword and has a beautiful shape. Samurai's win. Screw the horses.[/quote'] Being mounted gives the knight reach over the Samurai, he can strike first and strike harder. But Spartans win this thread. Because Spartans never lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Metal Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Spartans beat them both and all they wear is a cloth to cover their junk and a cheap bronze (or whatever it's made of) chestplate. I think they have shields' date=' swords, spears, and leggings too but I heard that they just eat their opponents so I don't see why they would need those.[/quote'] This is madness! Madness? THIS IS SPARTA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Spartans beat them both and all they wear is a cloth to cover their junk and a cheap bronze (or whatever it's made of) chestplate. I think they have shields' date=' swords, spears, and leggings too but I heard that they just eat their opponents so I don't see why they would need those.[/quote'] This is madness! Madness? THIS IS SPARTA! HAOO! HA-Wait a minute. No it isn't. :<Liar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 The subject of bamboo came up, Samurais use steel.Samurais have better training, they're faster, wider vision and greater discipline.A knight is also disciplined, they have the possiblility of riding horses (Although Military Class Samurai also have been known to ride horses), there have a range of weapons that outclass that of the Samurai. Givin the fact that Knights are covered from heat to toe in armor, and have more advanced weapons, specifically the use of the Crossbow Vs the Yumi, Ima gonna go with Knights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake_boy Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 samurais beat knights hands down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 The subject of bamboo came up' date=' Samurais use steel.Samurais have better training, they're faster, wider vision and greater discipline.A knight is also disciplined, they have the possiblility of riding horses (Although Military Class Samurai also have been known to ride horses), there have a range of weapons that outclass that of the Samurai. Givin the fact that Knights are covered from heat to toe in armor, and have more advanced weapons, specifically the use of the Crossbow Vs the Yumi, Ima gonna go with Knights[/quote'] I feel like I'm on an episode of "Deadliest Warrior" XD Which by the way, Samurai beat Vikings, if anyone was wondering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milk-Chan Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 -Both were armored, but knights had the superior armor. K-Both had amazing swords, but Samurai had the lighter, yet still as deadly Katana. S-Neither were necessarily horseback. It all depended on their rank. B-Crossbows reinvented ranged attacking during the time, and were superior to Bows. K-Both were trained under strict discipline, however I believe Samurai had it worse, in turn which made them better fighters. SIn turn, Knights were somewhat advantageous, but then again so were the Samurai. But I just think Samurai would win. Until the Spartans came in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 Silk and bamboo armor wouldn't protect you from anything. First time Crab Helmet was wrong.A tennis ball thrown at 2 MPH. Also, knights > samurai. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 -Both were armored' date=' but knights had the superior armor. K-Both had amazing swords, but Samurai had the lighter, yet still as deadly Katana. S[b']-Neither were necessarily horseback. It all depended on their rank.[/b] B-Crossbows reinvented ranged attacking during the time, and were superior to Bows. K-Both were trained under strict discipline, however I believe Samurai had it worse, in turn which made them better fighters. SIn turn, Knights were somewhat advantageous, but then again so were the Samurai. But I just think Samurai would win. Until the Spartans came in... False. All knights were nobility. All knights were mounted. Those two things pretty much defined the term "knight". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 A knight without a horse would just be a soldier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Metal Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 I feel like I'm on an episode of "Deadliest Warrior" XD Which by the way' date=' Samurai beat Vikings, if anyone was wondering.[/quote'] That was bullcrap. Vikings are way more manly and kewler. They should have won =( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 Samurai wins hands down. They are much more bad ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.