Cypress Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 discuss placement on bannlist personally, i think it should not be banned, for 1000 life points is perfetly fine of a price to pay for a discard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesirson Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 IMO, it should be at 1, because making your opponent discard is powerfull, but the cost is fine, so 1 is where I would have placed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 Don't forget that you get to choose which card to dump, and you get a free look at your opponent's hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber-Valley™ Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 LMAO. Should be Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 0141 hand removal. Low cost.You get too see your opponent's hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 Minus 1/8 of your LP minus 1 card from your hand =/= Free look at your opponents hand and your choice of a discard from their hand.It's like going to a candy shop with 8 pennies and a piece of paper and the owner has 5 suckers in his hand but you dont know what flavor they are because he's covering them up.You throw the piece of paper and 1 of the pennies away and look at the flavors of the suckers and throw away his favorite. Note, these are like 4 dollar suckers. =p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 personally' date=' i think it should not be banned, for 1000 life points is perfetly fine of a price to pay for a discard[/quote'] IMO' date=' it should be at 1, because making your opponent discard is powerfull, but the cost is fine, so 1 is where I would have placed it.[/quote'] LMAO. Should be Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 The only reason Trap Dustshoot is limited and not banned is because 1) They have to have atleast 4 cards in their hand, 2) It only targets MONSTERS so if they have none... yeah, 3) IT SENDS IT TO THE DECK. That is a very important step. Because NONE of those are met by this card, it's banned. OH and the fact that it can be played instantly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 The only reason Trap Dustshoot is limited and not banned is because 1) They have to have atleast 4 cards in their hand' date=' 2) It only targets MONSTERS so if they have none... yeah, 3) IT SENDS IT TO THE DECK. That is a very important step. Because NONE of those are met by this card, it's banned. OH and the fact that it can be played instantly.[/quote'] WRONG! The reason is Konami. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 The only reason Trap Dustshoot is limited and not banned is because 1) They have to have atleast 4 cards in their hand' date=' 2) It only targets MONSTERS so if they have none... yeah, 3) IT SENDS IT TO THE DECK. That is a very important step. Because NONE of those are met by this card, it's banned. OH and the fact that it can be played instantly.[/quote'] WRONG! The reason is Konami. Except for the fact that Trap Dustshoot is actually fair when Confiscation isn't... yeah, that's just Konami Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 The only reason Trap Dustshoot is limited and not banned is because 1) They have to have atleast 4 cards in their hand' date=' 2) It only targets MONSTERS so if they have none... yeah, 3) IT SENDS IT TO THE DECK. That is a very important step. Because NONE of those are met by this card, it's banned. OH and the fact that it can be played instantly.[/quote'] WRONG! The reason is Konami. Except for the fact that Trap Dustshoot is actually fair when Confiscation isn't... yeah, that's just KonamiIt isn't fair thought because starting out with this at the start of the match gives you a huge advantage over your opponent because you know their hand and make them loss the most helpful card in their hand. On Topic:@Cyber-Valley™, Kuroda Naoki, and Cypress lol, no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 Don't forget that you get to choose which card to dump' date=' and you get a free look at your opponent's hand.[/quote']What about the fact that the Opponent might have all the wrong cards in his/her hand?You pretty much wasted 1000. personally' date=' i think it should not be banned, for 1000 life points is perfetly fine of a price to pay for a discard[/quote'] IMO' date=' it should be at 1, because making your opponent discard is powerfull, but the cost is fine, so 1 is where I would have placed it.[/quote'] LMAO. Should be Limited. Honestly, I have no idea where Crab finds these.But they are still really funny XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 I love how DAZ actually considers "it sends it to the deck instead of discarding it" to be a weakness. Don't forget that you get to choose which card to dump' date=' and you get a free look at your opponent's hand.[/quote']What about the fact that the Opponent might have all the wrong cards in his/her hand?You pretty much wasted 1000. Next you'll be saying that Raigeki should be unbanned because the opponent might not have any good monsters out anyhow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 Don't forget that you get to choose which card to dump' date=' and you get a free look at your opponent's hand.[/quote']What about the fact that the Opponent might have all the wrong cards in his/her hand?You pretty much wasted 1000. Next you'll be saying that Raigeki should be unbanned because the opponent might not have any good monsters out anyhow. "Might" was the keyword here.And still, its an easily usable 1-for-1 that discards from the hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 The only reason Trap Dustshoot is limited and not banned is because 1) They have to have atleast 4 cards in their hand' date=' 2) It only targets MONSTERS so if they have none... yeah, 3) [b']IT SENDS IT TO THE DECK[/b]. That is a very important step. Because NONE of those are met by this card, it's banned. OH and the fact that it can be played instantly. so you think THE FORCEFUL SENTRY is unrightly banned sending back to the deck is worse than discarding btw because its much easier to retrive a card from the graveyard than it is the deck and you just decrease your chances of drawing an important card. and most importantly you lose a card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 Pay 1000 Life Points to see their hand and discard a card from their hand. Activate Mind Crush on another card. It's basically Delinquent Duo except you get to choose the cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 I dont see this card having a huge impact on the meta if unbanned, but it should still be banned for reasons which have been explained countless times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 [align=center]Pay 1000 Life Points to see their hand and discard a card from their hand. Activate Mind Crush on another card. It's basically Delinquent Duo except you get to choose the cards.true plus it can be worse if you have three of the same card in your hand. I dont see this card having a huge impact on the meta if unbanned' date=' but it should still be banned for reasons which have been explained countless times.[/quote'] meta shouldnt affect the banlist[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.