.Frostpaw Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 I pulled this in an Ancient Prophecy pack. At first, I was like >.< but then I was like ^_^. So what do you guys think of this card? What decks would this card be amazing in? I think it would be amazingly helpful in LS, and Zombies. I'm sure that I'm forgetting another deck-type that this would be amazing in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Meh. It has to be exactly four, and it has to be destroyed that turn. Not all that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 "this turn" ruined it as if it is destroyed on your opponent's turn you can't revive... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Frostpaw Posted August 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Well, you guys have a point, but it still has it's uses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Megacyber Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 It appears to be dependant of your opponent. Dependant of your opponent = FAIL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 It appears to be dependant on your opponent. Dependant of your opponent = FAIL Apparently Recruiters aren't good then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 It appears to be dependant of your opponent. Dependant of your opponent = FAIL How is this card dependent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 It appears to be dependant of your opponent. Dependant of your opponent = FAIL How is this card dependent? Read the effect again, then get back to us. Anyways, it's a counter to Mirror Force and Torrential Tribute... Actually, activate this after activating Torrent on the field in response to your own summon. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Frostpaw Posted August 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 It appears to be dependant of your opponent. Dependant of your opponent = FAIL How is this card dependent? I don't get how it's dependant on your opponent. You could blow one of your monsters up with DAD, then activate this. That is, if you're running Goblin Zombie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 But it isn't dependent on your opponent... =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Frostpaw Posted August 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 But it isn't dependent on your opponent... =/ I noticed that after I posted, then edited it into my post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 But it isn't dependent on your opponent... =/ It isn't very often that you destroy your own monsters with an effect. One of the few would be BRD and TT and that's situational. It has to be the same turn, so for the most part, it has to be your OPPONENT that destroys your monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 But it isn't dependent on your opponent... =/ Name a good reason to blow up your own LV4 monster with an effect. orihime's only valid target from the 2 is Goblin Zombie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Frostpaw Posted August 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 But it isn't dependent on your opponent... =/ Name a good reason to blow up your own LV4 monster with an effect. orihime's only valid target from the 2 is Goblin Zombie. Oops, I didn't realize that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 But it isn't dependent on your opponent... =/ Name a good reason to blow up your own LV4 monster with an effect. orihime's only valid target from the 2 is Goblin Zombie. Who says it has to be deliberate? Black rose still exist, not to mention demise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 But it isn't dependent on your opponent... =/ Name a good reason to blow up your own LV4 monster with an effect. orihime's only valid target from the 2 is Goblin Zombie. Who says it has to be deliberate? Black rose still exist' date=' not to mention demise.[/quote'] And as I pointed out, so does TT. Also, all of the above are limited, and one of them isn't even used yet. Not exactly a convincing case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 But it isn't dependent on your opponent... =/ Name a good reason to blow up your own LV4 monster with an effect. orihime's only valid target from the 2 is Goblin Zombie. Who says it has to be deliberate? Black rose still exist' date=' not to mention demise.[/quote'] And as I pointed out, so does TT. Also, all of the above are limited, and one of them isn't even used yet. Not exactly a convincing case. Lol for thinking the extra deck cares about limited cards. And if your mentioning Demise, im pretty sure an intelligent person wouldn't deck it without an easy way to access it. And if if one does, Gold sarco still exist. My arguments never have to be convincing, just valid with logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 But it isn't dependent on your opponent... =/ Name a good reason to blow up your own LV4 monster with an effect. orihime's only valid target from the 2 is Goblin Zombie. Who says it has to be deliberate? Black rose still exist' date=' not to mention demise.[/quote'] And as I pointed out, so does TT. Also, all of the above are limited, and one of them isn't even used yet. Not exactly a convincing case. Lol for thinking the extra deck cares about limited cards. And if your mentioning Demise, im pretty sure an intelligent person wouldn't deck it without an easy way to access it. And if if one does, Gold sarco still exist. My arguments never have to be convincing, just valid with logic. In this case, it DOES matter that Rose is limited (also, the limiting on Rose had a large impact on the playstyle of a particular archetype, don't try it). Would you run a card that's only playable when, on the off chance, you happen to pull out that one card in your deck that nukes with said card in your hand? Logic says no. Most would not, as can be seen with cards like D-Draw, you need a larger amount of targets than 3. Also, being searchable by Gold Sarcophagus changes nothing when EVERYTHING is searchable by Gold Sarcophagus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 In this case' date=' it DOES matter that Rose is limited (also, the limiting on Rose had a large impact on the playstyle of a particular archetype, don't try it).[/quote']Limitation matters for Main deck only. Any combo that requires a guaranteed card is guaranteed. Its not like you will ever need to draw Black rose. Its placement is forever irrelevant until its banned. Would you run a card that's only playable when, on the off chance, you happen to pull out that one card in your deck that nukes with said card in your hand? Logic says no. Most would not, as can be seen with cards like D-Draw, you need a larger amount of targets than 3.Playability of a card and a good card effect is two different things. Take the last warrior from another planet for example. The effect is great, almost perfect. However his Summoning conditions and requirements makes the card unplayable. This card is no difference. The only thing worth arguing about this card is if the effect is worth the requirement, I personally don't think so. However, at the same time it isn't unreasonable. It could have future uses, perhaps LS new play thing. Who knows. Also, being searchable by Gold Sarcophagus changes nothing when EVERYTHING is searchable by Gold Sarcophagus.With this in mind, it further proves my argument of Limited meaning nothing. Unless a combo can only be pulled off by multiple cards of the same name (in this case, it doesn't) List placement means nothing if said card isn't forbidden. For example, If a deck contains 1 limited card and 2 Gold Sarco, You can very well say your running 3 copies of named card if you dedicate Sarco to named card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Eh if it didn't say Main Phase 2 I could see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daboss144 Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 If it were a quickplay it would be pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Eh, waste of deck space IMO Too situational Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 If it were a quickplay it would be pretty good. Aggreed. But how about this: Suicide Tomato or Angel > This > E-Tele 4 a Tuner > Synchro > Profit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Frostpaw Posted August 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 If it were a quickplay it would be pretty good. Aggreed. But how about this: Suicide Tomato or Angel > This > E-Tele 4 a Tuner > Synchro > Profit? lol at bold. If you don't realize why, you are either blind, a terribad yugimonz player, or can't read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 If it were a quickplay it would be pretty good. Aggreed. But how about this: Suicide Tomato or Angel > This > E-Tele 4 a Tuner > Synchro > Profit? lol at bold. If you don't realize why' date=' you are either blind, a terribad yugimonz player, or can't read.[/quote'] I'm blind and can't read!! D=> I'm bad at yugimonz... ='( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.