My Bleach cards, 3rd update ready

[Euphan]

Here are the first 8 of my Bleach, depending on how this subject does I may add more in the future.

 

 

Sadly my Byakuya Kuchiki card's writing came out smaller then I hoped for, so for anyone who can't see this is what it says:

When this monster is summoned to the field you can summon one "Blade Token" (0 ATK, 0 DEF) in defense mode to each empty monster zone on your side of the field. Each turn you may sacrifice one Blade Token to activate one of the following effects:

-Destroy one of your opponents monster cards.

-Byakuya Kuchiki can't be sent off the field by any effect and can't be destroy for the rest of the turn.

 

Update 2 with 8 more cards:

 

 

Update 3 with 8 more cards:

 

 

Questions, comments, suggestions, and which Shinigami you want next are always welcome so speak up and enjoy.

[ribery1993]

Nice Cards.

[Dragon Master]

nice cards 8/10

[shadowsoldier]

I'm sorry to say, but Ichigo Bankai is overpowered. It has no summoning requirements and can not only destroy an opponents card upon summoning, you can also enable it to attack directly. For something that powerful, you should at least require some stricter summoning requirements, like negating special summonings of the card.

 

I also think that Zanpakuto Bankai is also overpowered. The only requirement is that you have a card in the grave. That can't really be hard to get. Then not only can you increase a monster's attack by 1000, that same monster can't be destroyed. There should either be more of a cost or you need to remove one of the effects.

 

Overall you have good cards about 7.5/10. I encourage you to make more cards but as strong as the characters are, they also need to be balanced cards.

[Euphan]

I'm sorry to say' date=' but Ichigo Bankai is overpowered. It has no summoning requirements and can not only destroy an opponents card upon summoning, you can also enable it to attack directly. For something that powerful, you should at least require some stricter summoning requirements, like negating special summonings of the card.

 

I also think that Zanpakuto Bankai is also overpowered. The only requirement is that you have a card in the grave. That can't really be hard to get. Then not only can you increase a monster's attack by 1000, that same monster can't be destroyed. There should either be more of a cost or you need to remove one of the effects.

 

Overall you have good cards about 7.5/10. I encourage you to make more cards but as strong as the characters are, they also need to be balanced cards.

[/quote']

 

Hmm, after looking over those cards with your suggestion in mind I must agree :oops: (to a point with Zanpakuto Bankai). Well probable redo Ichigo, Bankai so it is either more balanced as is or have a summon requierment. I well probable lower the ATK addition of Zanpakuto Bankai, then either change the can't be destroyed to only battle or how long that effect lasts.

 

Also well probable change Hanataro Yamada to have more synergy with cards like The Seireitei. These changes well probable be added with my next 8 cards (probable won't happen until the end of today or tomorrow, so if you want any specific Shinigami cards before I return post em and I'll see what I can do with my next 8 ). Thanks for your opinions and keep it up :mrgreen:.

[Seligsalt]

good cards 9/10

 

make some hollows!!! Fishbone D. Forever!!! XP (He just looks awesome)

[Flame Dragon]

Goot cards, finally some bleach cards that aren't half bad. 8/10

 

Try to improve the grammar

[Euphan]

Finished with the 3rd group of 8, as well as fixed up "Ichigo, Bankai", "Zanpakuto Bankai" and even updated "Hanataro Yamada" to fit more with the decks theme.

[Seligsalt]

Crap man!!! I was using the pic for the Kido spell!!!!! *is t.o'd* grrr......Mine are better though...>.>

[shadowsoldier]

Your cards are good, but you could probably use better clarification of your effects. Like for Ikkaku Madarame, what if it attacks a defense position monster and not destroy it, technically there's another monster on the field, so it could attack again. I think it would better to have the effect read this "If this monster destroys a monster on your opponent's side of the field, and there is another monster on your opponent's side of the field, this monster may attack again".

[Euphan]

Your cards are good' date=' but you could probably use better clarification of your effects. Like for Ikkaku Madarame, what if it attacks a defense position monster and not destroy it, technically there's another monster on the field, so it could attack again. I think it would better to have the effect read this "If this monster destroys a monster on your opponent's side of the field, and there is another monster on your opponent's side of the field, this monster may attack again".

[/quote']

 

Although some cards could use some grammar and clarification (not my strong suit alas), Ikkaku Madarame is actually correct (One scenario I thought of while making him was if a attack position monster who can't be destroyed by battle was the only one on their field, he should still be able to attack that monster again, as not only does it not seem to be too unbalanced but it also fits with the personality of the character). Though thank you for your post and if you see any other cards that look strange (or you see a way to shorten an effect while keeping the same meaning) free feel to point it out and I'll either change it or explain why I disagree. Also as always if you have any Shinigami who you want to be next please feel free to suggest one.

[gabriel jr]

cool

[aztex]

Awesome cards! No. 1! 10/10