The Dark Megacyber Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 [align=center][/align] This is not so great in this meta because you don't choose the cards, but Spell reclamation exists. It could return? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 I can see this used against Blackwings i really don't know. But yeah it could make a comeback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lawless Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 I don't think we;ll ever, EVER see this back. It has too much advantage for just 1000lps...If it's nerfed, then yeah, but like this, no way. Anyone to argue that doesn't know howgood of a card this is, even at 1 in a new meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Yes, because your opponent losing two cards in their hand for a mere cost is EVER not a bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 your opp loses 2 cards just for 1 card and 1000lp? nope stay on the list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 ^ Same here.You only pay 1000 LP, and your opponent discards 2 cards. That's a HUGE problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 2 cards are a big thing ya know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 What about its weaker counterpart? Confiscation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 What about its weaker counterpart? Confiscation? That gives you a hand look and lets you decide which card they lose. No way should that ever be legalized again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 At topic: No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Gideon. Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 just no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Is it possible yea, because we're talking about the people that put Chaos Sorcerer at 2. Should it come back, hell no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombiepromking Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 This + Spell Reclamation + Spell Economics = Profit? Not a bad card. I didn't really understand why it was banned at first. But then i read it again, it's a little too strong and then this in a psychic deck is a big problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 This is not so great in this meta because you don't choose the cards' date=' but Spell reclamation exists. It could return?[/quote'] Cool story bro, considering people use that exact same Spell Reclamation to get this card back. And as it is, this card is a freakin' +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Thing 1 and Thing 2 should stay in the hat. Is it possible yea' date=' because we're talking about the people that put Chaos Sorcerer at 2 .[/quote']+ And Gale at 1. <,<Scary thought right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Thing 1 and Thing 2 should stay in the hat. Is it possible yea' date=' because we're talking about the people that put Chaos Sorcerer at 2 .[/quote']+ And Gale at 1. <,<Scary thought right? Gale is Fine at 1 and you know it, quit belly aching. There are stupid for leaving Black Whirlwind at 3 though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Megacyber Posted August 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Is it possible yea' date=' because we're talking about the people that put Chaos Sorcerer at 2. [/quote'] I was talking about that. With Konami everything is possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VolTama Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Is it possible yea' date=' because we're talking about the people that put Chaos Sorcerer at 2. [/quote'] I was talking about that. With Konami everything is possible. You forgot that they can't make good banlists. Nor can they make an archetype that's neither too broken or too weak. Even splashable cards (like the one in this topic) proves that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Is it possible yea' date=' because we're talking about the people that put Chaos Sorcerer at 2. [/quote'] I was talking about that. With Konami everything is possible. You forgot that they can't make good banlists. Nor can they make an archetype that's neither too broken or too weak. Even splashable cards (like the one in this topic) proves that point. Guys, the next banlist is going to ban all the cool cards, and unban Chaos Emperor ZOMG! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Megacyber Posted August 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Is it possible yea' date=' because we're talking about the people that put Chaos Sorcerer at 2. [/quote'] I was talking about that. With Konami everything is possible. You forgot that they can't make good banlists. Nor can they make an archetype that's neither too broken or too weak. Even splashable cards (like the one in this topic) proves that point. Guys, the next banlist is going to ban all the cool cards, and unban Chaos Emperor ZOMG! I know you were using sarcasm, but it could be true. Remeber, the company's real name is FAILnami Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 If GB's had a monster that could discard cards from the hand but wasn't bad, they coulod probably be top tier again. With this, GB's can easily wreck the opponent and make sure that he/she can not make a come back. And this is pretty much true with any other control deck. So no, this card deserves to stay banned. I would hate to see the opponent use this, summon Judge, and then clear my field:(. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Just as all the others said: no!Imagine having this at 3... and drawing all 3 in your opening hand :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 If the effect was change to pay half your life points, then i'd understand, but now it is just too powerful.Stay on list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 If the effect was change to pay half your life points' date=' then i'd understand, but now it is just too powerful.[/quote'] Pay 1000 Life Points. Pay half your life points. I agree. That could be unlimited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 so... did this topic turn to flames or is there still something to be learned from this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.