Jump to content

Offerings to the Doomed vs. Tribute to the Doomed [DISC]


Recommended Posts

Guest PikaPerson01

Also' date=' Mystery Guest, this is not a discussion about Offerings to the Doomed, like you stated earlier.[/quote']

 

Pay attention more. It was originally a topic about Offerings to the Doomed. Some guy randomly posted "Hai guiz! Even Tribute to the Doomed is better, and that's horrible!", and the TC decided to roll with it and edited his first post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

soul taker > OTTD

 

lightning vortex > TTTD

 

Explain' date=' Mysty. Why even bother discussing them any further after this statement has been made?

[/quote']

 

The last time I posted in this thread was before Tonisanoob posted that. Since I don't have Moderator locking powers or anything, I technically have to let the discussion continue until somebody decides to lock it or it dies out.

In my opinion, Offerings to the Doomed maybe, just maybe, has some use based on the fact that it is a chainable Quick-play spell and, therefore, stop Jinzo, DAD, or Judgment Dragon during the turn it is summoned, while Bottomless cannot stop the first one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offerings to the Doomed

Pros: Quick-play, No cost, Perfect for Infernity decks (If they existed) and, of course, Reckless Greed

Cons: Only works on face-up monsters, skipping draw is generally harsher than discarding

 

Tribute to the Doomed

Pros: Works on face-down monsters, can be used to fill up Graveyard (though there are much better cards)

Cons: Not Quick-play, must be able to pay cost

 

It's debatable as to whether or not Soul Taker is better than these two. Lightning Vortex definitely is better, though once again it only works on face-up monsters. On the whole, it seems that Tribute to the Doomed is definitely outclassed, while Offerings to the Doomed still has some uses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...