Anti-Noob Card

[burnpsy]

[align=center]

 

Negate the attack of 1 monster your opponent controls and inflict damage to your opponent equal to its ATK.

[/align]

 

They summon Dark Magician, or Neos, or something. They attack. You activate this. They run home crying, you win the match.

[Flame Dragon]

Good in burn and when you first start playing. Any time else it's bad.

[Tabris]

More like an anti-fairness card. Banworthy.

[shadowferret]

I prefer Dimension Wall, personally.

But Magic Cylinder can be funny when your opponent pumps with Sirocco...

[Father Wolf]

U best be trollin! this card is only good in burn.

[Manjoume Thunder]

No this card is not good in burn.

There are other cards that burn better and faster.

[Tabris]

No this card is not good in burn.

There are other cards that burn better and faster.

 

They do inflict measly points of damage in some stages of a game, though: Secret Barrel, Just Desserts etc.

[JG.]

Personally, I like this card, I run it occaisionally. I don't see why people think it's so bad. It negates an attack, and inflicts damage to your opponent.

[Sparta™]

No this card is not good in burn.

 

 

 

Srsly' date=' are you srs?

 

 

Personally, I like this card, I run it occaisionally. I don't see why people think it's so bad. It negates an attack, and inflicts damage to your opponent.

 

Well, there are better cards, like Mirror Force. It negates and destroys every monster in Attack position on your opponents side of the field.

[Manjoume Thunder]

No this card is not good in burn.

 

 

 

Srsly' date=' are you srs?

[/quote']

 

If we apply your logic "If it burns put it in a burn deck", then Sparks is good in burn.

[Sparta™]

No this card is not good in burn.

 

 

 

Srsly' date=' are you srs?

[/quote']

 

If we apply your logic "If it burns put it in a burn deck", then Sparks is good in burn.

 

The reason it's good in burns is because it inflicts damage to your opponents life points equal to the ATK of the attacking monster.

 

Now, for all we know, that could be 4000 ATK. And if it's a low ATK monster, we wouldn't use it that turn, would we?

[Manjoume Thunder]

No this card is not good in burn.

 

 

 

Srsly' date=' are you srs?

[/quote']

 

If we apply your logic "If it burns put it in a burn deck", then Sparks is good in burn.

 

The reason it's good in burns is because it inflicts damage to your opponents life points equal to the ATK of the attacking monster.

 

Now, for all we know, that could be 4000 ATK. And if it's a low ATK monster, we wouldn't use it that turn, would we?

1| It's not chainable. Most of the time when your opponent is going to make a huge hit he plays Heavy/Trunade/Cold Wave/etc. Ceasefire, Secret Barrel and other cards like these can be played whenever you want.

2| (see bold) It could also be low.

3| And if the monster has 4k ATK then this would be good outside of burn.

[Sparta™]

No this card is not good in burn.

 

 

 

Srsly' date=' are you srs?

[/quote']

 

If we apply your logic "If it burns put it in a burn deck", then Sparks is good in burn.

 

The reason it's good in burns is because it inflicts damage to your opponents life points equal to the ATK of the attacking monster.

 

Now, for all we know, that could be 4000 ATK. And if it's a low ATK monster, we wouldn't use it that turn, would we?

1| It's not chainable. Most of the time when your opponent is going to make a huge hit he plays Heavy/Trunade/Cold Wave/etc. Ceasefire, Secret Barrel and other cards like these can be played whenever you want.

2| (see bold) It could also be low.

3| And if the monster has 4k ATK then this would be good outside of burn.

 

1. Meh, the chances of them getting Heavy or Trunade is 2 out of 40. We also have cards that can negate them.

 

2. If it's low, don't use it....

 

3. EBI vs. MC = RAEG

[Toffee.]

Every newbie on the planet runs this card.

They think its "LOLGOOD!!111"

 

Good in burn and when you first start playing. Any time else it's bad.

Flame' date=' you do realize that [i']alot[/i] of people think this card is a "staple"

Its sad...

[blaze.]

Good when someone uses a major noob attack boost combo, they attack thinking "ZOMGs eYE One tEh GaMez!!!!!11!!!!!!one!!!!eleventy-twelve!!!!!" Then you use this, and they are like "ZOMGs UsE LieK ChEETiN uR SumTHIn!!!!!11!!!!!!one!!!!

eleventy-twelve!!!!!

 

I actually had a noob try to pull a fast one on me when I used this, and when they used it. I used, they were like "Nuh-uh, thats not what it does you cheatin" Turns out they had one in their deck, thought I didnt notice and said "I activate this!!!! When you attack and I activate this you automatically lose. I walked away and said "No."

 

Moral of the story? DAMN THOSE F***ING NOOBS...

[Master Hyperion]

Useless outside of burn with Solemn at 1. But even Solemn at 3, it still isn't all that great outside burn, although it was a funny finisher.

[cerberus21]

No this card is not good in burn.

 

 

 

Srsly' date=' are you srs?

[/quote']

 

If we apply your logic "If it burns put it in a burn deck", then Sparks is good in burn.

 

The reason it's good in burns is because it inflicts damage to your opponents life points equal to the ATK of the attacking monster.

 

Now, for all we know, that could be 4000 ATK. And if it's a low ATK monster, we wouldn't use it that turn, would we?

1| It's not chainable. Most of the time when your opponent is going to make a huge hit he plays Heavy/Trunade/Cold Wave/etc. Ceasefire, Secret Barrel and other cards like these can be played whenever you want.

2| (see bold) It could also be low.

3| And if the monster has 4k ATK then this would be good outside of burn.

 

1. Meh, the chances of them getting Heavy or Trunade is 2 out of 40. We also have cards that can negate them.

 

2. If it's low, don't use it....

 

3. EBI vs. MC = RAEG

 

ComputerWhiz=right. Obviously, if the monster has low ATK, you just DON'T USE IT. Is it really that hard for you to understand? Do you activate Mirror Force when your opponent has 1 monster on the field? Do you activate Cold Wave when your opponent controls no face-downs? Do you play Lightning Vortex when your opponent has a craptastic monster on the field. No. No you don't.

[Manjoume Thunder]

No this card is not good in burn.

 

 

 

Srsly' date=' are you srs?

[/quote']

 

If we apply your logic "If it burns put it in a burn deck", then Sparks is good in burn.

 

The reason it's good in burns is because it inflicts damage to your opponents life points equal to the ATK of the attacking monster.

 

Now, for all we know, that could be 4000 ATK. And if it's a low ATK monster, we wouldn't use it that turn, would we?

1| It's not chainable. Most of the time when your opponent is going to make a huge hit he plays Heavy/Trunade/Cold Wave/etc. Ceasefire, Secret Barrel and other cards like these can be played whenever you want.

2| (see bold) It could also be low.

3| And if the monster has 4k ATK then this would be good outside of burn.

 

1. Meh, the chances of them getting Heavy or Trunade is 2 out of 40. We also have cards that can negate them.

 

2. If it's low, don't use it....

 

3. EBI vs. MC = RAEG

 

ComputerWhiz=right. Obviously, if the monster has low ATK, you just DON'T USE IT. Is it really that hard for you to understand? Do you activate Mirror Force when your opponent has 1 monster on the field? Do you activate Cold Wave when your opponent controls no face-downs? Do you play Lightning Vortex when your opponent has a craptastic monster on the field. No. No you don't.

 

Your opponent might never play a monster with high attack.

In burn Ceasefire, Barrel and other cards are better. This one is really situational. If your opponent summon a big monster they wil clear your backrow first. Gahh I already said that >.<

 

Provide a good reasoning why should I run this in burn decks.

[Aesirson]

[Von Csent]

Your opponent might never play a monster with high attack.

 

Then you have nothing to worry about...

 

Provide a good reasoning why should I run this in burn decks.

 

Burn does not have great defenses, so you will need plenty of protection. May as well do damage in the process.

[Manjoume Thunder]

Your opponent might never play a monster with high attack.

 

Then you have nothing to worry about...

 

Then this is a dead draw

 

Provide a good reasoning why should I run this in burn decks.

 

Burn does not have great defenses' date=' so you will need plenty of protection. May as well do damage in the process.

 

[b'] Roar is better defense than this also Burn decks should win FAST so they don't need that much stall [/b]

[Mysty]

I hope neither of you mind, burnpsy and Kuroda Naoki, but I decided to make a N00b Cylinder card of my own:

It's based a bit off of Kuroda's idea, so I give credit for the idea to him.

I also give credit to the personwho made the picture. I don't know who made it though, I found it by google.

[cerberus21]

Your opponent might never play a monster with high attack.

 

Then you have nothing to worry about...

 

Provide a good reasoning why should I run this in burn decks.

 

Burn does not have great defenses' date=' so you will need plenty of protection. May as well do damage in the process.

[/quote']

This. Magic Cylinder is common sense in burn decks.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

ComputerWhiz=right. Obviously' date=' if the monster has low ATK, you just DON'T USE IT. Is it really that hard for you to understand? Do you activate Mirror Force when your opponent has 1 monster on the field? Do you activate Cold Wave when your opponent controls no face-downs? Do you play Lightning Vortex when your opponent has a craptastic monster on the field. No. No you don't.

[/quote']

 

The funniest part is, those cards are used for just that a bunch of the time <<.

 

Mirror Force = Yes, yes you do, especially when you have a game win set up and need your LP or a monster, or they have a good monster out.

 

Cold Wave = Yes, to stop them from setting so you can OTK the next turn (i.e. you go first or need a turn)

 

LV = About the only one you got right, YAY!

 

You are using situational logic to prove the use of a situational card, which ironically is used situationally. My point is, this card might not be horridly bad, but there are cards that are better in place of it.

 

Pika would have a great entrance right now...

[daboss144]

Can we all agree that there are usually better cards to use.