Guest PikaPerson01 Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 4) All cards with ATK and/or DEF higher than (card's original Level*450.) I don't understand the point of this rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted August 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 Back, banned multi-attackers, banned a bunch more individual cards with rule 9. 4) All cards with ATK and/or DEF higher than (card's original Level*450.) I don't understand the point of this rule. To control the effectiveness of beatdown to an extent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 That doesn't really do anything though. If were not allowed to use 2000 beatsticks, we'll all use 1900 beatsticks. If we're not allowed 1900 beatsticks, we'll drop to 1800 ones. And so on, no matter what. <_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted August 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 The standard ATK for beatdown monsters is irrelevant, less ATK = less damage to your opponent's Life Points, which would hinder beatdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 At least I still have Ancient Brain. Wat.Since everyone else seems to like posting this in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 3/0 gone mad' date=' anyone?[/quote'] Eh, it's not even a new idea; I think I first saw something like this with a list on Pojo made, if I recall correctly, T-Drag - except his attempt to axiomize 3/0 had more rules, but its rules were less extreme (i.e. banning attack doubling and attack boosts over a certain cap rather than outright banning all stat altering). Incidentally, he abandoned the idea because it was terrible, and his attempt was way better than this one (and didn't lead to a rule that basically said "also this stuff is banned too because I didn't construct my axioms very well did I?"). So yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 6) All cards listing alternate win conditions in their effects.Aww.... Why ban Venominaga? 8) All multiple-attackers. But Polaris, you would be banning your Duel Spirit :O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 6) All cards listing alternate win conditions in their effects.Aww.... Why ban Venominaga?I think a better question is why ban Destiny Board. This makes me cry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I think a better question is why ban Exodius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 So... it's a 3/0 list made with a dartboard and a blindfold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Also, I noticed that Polaris hates me. 0,0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 This is actually a real thread this time. Newly Banned 1) All cards with effects capable of modifying ATK or DEF.2) All Spell or Trap Cards capable of subtracting a monster from your opponent's hand or field without costing any other cards than themselves.3) All Spell or Trap Cards capable of adding an additional monster to your hand or field without costing any other cards than themselves.4) All cards with ATK and/or DEF higher than (card's original Level*450.)5) All cards capable of netting a +1 or greater amount of Card Advantage outside of battle.6) All cards listing alternate win conditions in their effects. 7) All cards which involve skipping a phase or turn of your opponent's. 8) All multiple-attackers. 9) Cyber End Dragon' date=' Dark Strike Fighter, Exchange of the Spirit, Graceful Charity, Life Equalizer, Reversal Quiz, and Skill Drain. [u']Newly Unlimited[/u] Everything else. What's wrong here? Other than nuking the card pool significantly. Rule #9 is crap. Don't go naming specific cards, you adjust the rules to include them, but you don't name specific cards if you are doing it like this. You may end up banning cards you don't want to, but if you want them banned you can't just tack them on at the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 this is a silly idea :P in all honestly i preferrd the 5 card blind thing, but this is just as funny =3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 This is actually a real thread this time. Newly Banned 1) All cards with effects capable of modifying ATK or DEF.2) All Spell or Trap Cards capable of subtracting a monster from your opponent's hand or field without costing any other cards than themselves.3) All Spell or Trap Cards capable of adding an additional monster to your hand or field without costing any other cards than themselves.4) All cards with ATK and/or DEF higher than (card's original Level*450.)5) All cards capable of netting a +1 or greater amount of Card Advantage outside of battle.6) All cards listing alternate win conditions in their effects. 7) All cards which involve skipping a phase or turn of your opponent's. 8) All multiple-attackers. 9) Cyber End Dragon' date=' Dark Strike Fighter, Exchange of the Spirit, Graceful Charity, Life Equalizer, Reversal Quiz, and Skill Drain. [u']Newly Unlimited[/u] Everything else. What's wrong here? Other than nuking the card pool significantly. Rule #9 is crap. Don't go naming specific cards, you adjust the rules to include them, but you don't name specific cards if you are doing it like this. You may end up banning cards you don't want to, but if you want them banned you can't just tack them on at the end. Cyber Twin is a double attackerDark Strike somewhat falls under rule #5, since the more monster you have the more damage you do. So that = card advantage? O,o ......I'm too lazy to try and make excuses for the others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 This is actually a real thread this time. Newly Banned 1) All cards with effects capable of modifying ATK or DEF.2) All Spell or Trap Cards capable of subtracting a monster from your opponent's hand or field without costing any other cards than themselves.3) All Spell or Trap Cards capable of adding an additional monster to your hand or field without costing any other cards than themselves.4) All cards with ATK and/or DEF higher than (card's original Level*450.)5) All cards capable of netting a +1 or greater amount of Card Advantage outside of battle.6) All cards listing alternate win conditions in their effects. 7) All cards which involve skipping a phase or turn of your opponent's. 8) All multiple-attackers. 9) Cyber End Dragon' date=' Dark Strike Fighter, Exchange of the Spirit, Graceful Charity, Life Equalizer, Reversal Quiz, and Skill Drain. [u']Newly Unlimited[/u] Everything else. What's wrong here? Other than nuking the card pool significantly. Rule #9 is crap. Don't go naming specific cards, you adjust the rules to include them, but you don't name specific cards if you are doing it like this. You may end up banning cards you don't want to, but if you want them banned you can't just tack them on at the end. Cyber Twin is a double attacker Cytwin and Cyend are not the same card. Dark Strike somewhat falls under rule #5' date=' since the more monster you have the more damage you do. So that = card advantage? O,o[/quote'] Dark Strike Fighter generates a -1 each time it uses its effect. -1 < +1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 This is actually a real thread this time. Newly Banned 1) All cards with effects capable of modifying ATK or DEF.2) All Spell or Trap Cards capable of subtracting a monster from your opponent's hand or field without costing any other cards than themselves.3) All Spell or Trap Cards capable of adding an additional monster to your hand or field without costing any other cards than themselves.4) All cards with ATK and/or DEF higher than (card's original Level*450.)5) All cards capable of netting a +1 or greater amount of Card Advantage outside of battle.6) All cards listing alternate win conditions in their effects. 7) All cards which involve skipping a phase or turn of your opponent's. 8) All multiple-attackers. 9) Cyber End Dragon' date=' Dark Strike Fighter, Exchange of the Spirit, Graceful Charity, Life Equalizer, Reversal Quiz, and Skill Drain. [u']Newly Unlimited[/u] Everything else. What's wrong here? Other than nuking the card pool significantly. Rule #9 is crap. Don't go naming specific cards, you adjust the rules to include them, but you don't name specific cards if you are doing it like this. You may end up banning cards you don't want to, but if you want them banned you can't just tack them on at the end. Cyber Twin is a double attackerDark Strike somewhat falls under rule #5, since the more monster you have the more damage you do. So that = card advantage? O,o ......I'm too lazy to try and make excuses for the others. I'd more see DSF under #6, he would have to loosen it a tad, but it is an alternate win condition by burn. Btw, all Dark World cards would be banned as they give a + with any card that discards cards from you hand << Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.