~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Now Semi-Limited. :? Discuss what decktypes can run him more successfully now that he'll be drawn into more often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Recruiter Chaos, Twilight, any deck that can run a healthy number of LIGHT and DARKs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnkoMaun Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 I f***ing hate the fact that I have only one of these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 If a deck has at least 6 lights and 6 darks it can likely run two of these successfully. I think a better topic is why the hell is this now 2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 If a deck has at least 6 lights and 6 darks it can likely run two of these successfully. I think a better topic is why the hell is this now 2? Konami Worker 1: So...what are we going to move from 1 to two this format?Konami Worker 2: Let's tape some limited cards on our magical dartboard and throw a magical dart at it!Konami Worker 1: Croikey, mate! Smashing manouvre!Konami Worker 2: Inorite? Let's go jogging while carrying a pair of scissors after work, shall we?Konami Worker 1: I know something funnier! Let's unban Breaker and DD Warrior Lady! They'll al think we're stupid!Konami Worker 2: Yes, but I still feel like running. That's why.Anyways, Ill be running Chaos Countdown due to this baby. Would 7 targets be enough to main 2 DeckDev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Now I want to make a Chaos Synchro deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 I love this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 I hate this card. That's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just-duelist Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Anyways' date=' Ill be running Chaos Countdown due to this baby. Would 7 targets be enough to main 2 DeckDev?[/quote'] yes 7 target is fine OT: makes you wonder what they'll do with the other 2 in the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maliki Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 I hate this card that is all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 It's going to 2 because idiots think it's balanced now because it's not as broken as DAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 It's going to 2 because idiots think it's balanced now because it's not as broken as DAD. You should've used caps. REALLY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 3 Darks/3 Lights is enough to justify it. Nothing can justify him being not at 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Replacement for the uses of DaD and JD. Just another reason on why Konami likes to funk with people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Replacement for the uses of DaD and JD. Just another reason on why Konami likes to f*** with people Thing is, DAD and JD are still around, as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Replacement for the uses of DaD and JD. Just another reason on why Konami likes to f*** with people Thing is' date=' DAD and JD are still around, as well.[/quote'] Basically Konami is saying "LS and anything with LS = THE BEST IDEA IN THE WORLD!!!" and want to support Twilight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthonyreimer Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 there should be maybie 4 lights and darks then it would be a good card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 What really makes this card deadly is the fact that after it is special summoned appropriatly it can be special summoned from the grave with any revival card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 It's going to 2 because idiots think it's balanced now because it's not as broken as DAD. You should've used caps. REALLY. I WAS THINKING HE SHOULD HAVE USED BOLD CAPS "FOR LOUD BOOMING EMPHASIS."But really, I really don't have any idea what Konami was thinking. Maybe they're trying to make Twilight a better deck in Japan? This also gets me thinking that, if the Japanese meta is so different, then:1. Why is it so different in the first place?2. The TCG should get a separate ban list.Chaos Sorcerer is easily overpowered and really should just stay banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Damn i hate this card.... as if getting DAD and JD dropped on us isn't enough we now have this for a slightly less powerful card but still screwed up all the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Blade Knight Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Any deck that can use light and dark cards, mainly twilight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.