.:pyramid:. Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 for instence why give us call of the haunted, and ban monster reborn. i mean monster reborn was the least broken on the three. prem>call>reborn can anyone explain any on the banlist apart from the correct decisions made by konami. go,go,go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Monster Reborn > Call of the Haunted. The reason is that it's too quick. It makes OTKs possible as soon as it's drawn, and there's less your opponent can do against it, but because s/t destruction doesn't work on it. Also, they might want to see Jinzo back or something. Anyway, I think all of their decisions are simply based on the Japanese meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 WTF? Call is NOT worse than reborn... call is the least broken of the three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 i mean monster reborn was the least broken on the three. This is the setup for the tsukkomi to smack you, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidchaor Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Anyway' date=' I think all of their decisions are simply based on the Japanese meta.[/quote'] that is true. the reason why JD is not banned is because of that. in american tournaments LS is considered one of the most used decks whereas japan they are one of the least used decks which influenced konami to ignore JD's possible ban because they are trying to have LS to win at all costs. that's why the banlist would possibly eliminate tele-DAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 to be fair most of the decisions on tht banlist are really good, exept lonefire blossom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 to be fair most of the decisions on tht banlist are really good' date=' exept lonefire blossom[/quote']Breaker at 3?Sorcerer at 2?Dulauren at 2?Solem at 1?Gale at 1 and not Black Whirlwind? How are those good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ω Link Ω Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 kanomi is run by a bunch of idiots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesCrow Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Oh the irony. Alsokonami =/= logicI think this is very much an experiment for the march banlist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 It's because Konami employees like Kevin Tewart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Well guys, Wc09's meta is........ Well, good game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 I personally think that there going to swap them around for lulz Damn Konami Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.