Sacred Dragon Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 [attachment=12527] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingdagger8 Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 Overpowered and bad grammar. Imagine if you had a deck of all spellcasters. Dark magician Girl V.2 would gain at least 3000 points just by summoning it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericoshea88 Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 DUDE!!...OVERPOWERD!!!....BAD GRAMMAR...and not to metion the picture isnt that great bro.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwhkiller Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 lol~ overpower .... and i have seen the pic and bad OCG.... 2/10 for trying tho.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doji33 Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 this isnt too great. In otherwords. FAIL. I see the effort though so ill give it a 1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kushina Uzumaki Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 .5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 banned list... srry... if the picture was clearer and the grammar was corrected itd be ok but still OP, plus its not very original of an idea 3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishfood20 Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 I used that picture for that yugioh card invasion flame dragon sorry :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uzumakinaruto93 Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 1. remove the summon dark magician effect 2. remove the attack bonus from hand and deck 3. blurry pic 4. maybe she should only be able to be summoned by offering a dark magician girl?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 Pic is blurry, overpowered, grammar problems. 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruxis89 Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 Gotta agree with the others. Too overpowered, bad gramar, pic could be better, and if she is a level monster, shouldn't you include that in the card's name, and give it an effect to summon dark magicain girl lv. 4? Since your still new i say 1.5/10. This card needs a lot of work still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Sadly, I must agree. The grammar is awful, but maybe ou could change her effect? Maybe for every two DMG(s) she gains 100? IDK...tough card to fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterOfMagicians Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 I have to agree. As the self-proclaimed Master of Magicians (I duel using ONLY Magician monsters), just in my deck alone (consisting nearly of 22 different Magicians) that dark magician girl would gain a minimum of 6600 attack power, not to mention the other Dark Magician Girls would gain at a maximum of 1800 attack each. This Magician offends me and my deck, and I must say it is not worthy of having the name of Dark Magician attached to it. I pride my Magicians, I love my Magicians. This is no Magician. This is an imitation god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Wow...harsh.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Don't worry, DMG v2 person. My cards aren't too good either...pretty..and could use some help...but not good. :[ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.