Jake the Sage Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 I will leave the topic of having Snitch getting banned alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Icy, most likely. xD 40Kendgame, its not communism. This is an oligarchy here. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40kendgame Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 ...And I have no clue what furries are- and do not think I want to know. It's more of a controversial issue then anything else' date=' though most are inappropriate. Humans genetically crossed with animals... Fundamentalists would hate that... And I don't like that they are usually depicted without clothes. But this is not somewhere to discuss that... nowhere on the forum is anywhere to discuss it, don't even PM me about it. 40Kendgame, its not communism. This is an oligarchy here. ;D Et tu, Hunter?I know it's intended to be an oligarchy, but the way it's heading scares me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake the Sage Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 40kendgame I would preferred to just have that info disclosed to me via IM. I do not want you getting in trouble because of my lack of knoweldge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snitch Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Omegakitty- I can see why you got a 50% warning for talking about hentai. Remember that most of the people who are part of this site are under 18 years old. And I have no clue what furries are- and do not think I want to know. [align=center]Anthromorphica's are humanoid animals. On a side-note - I'm not really childish' date=' I speak more the truth than the rest of you. It's pure obvious that you made this thread against Umbra and against the Advanced Clause, no matter what claims you might make you didn't. :/[/align'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake the Sage Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Well Snitch, if you will not believe me no matter what I say then I see no point in having to agrue with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake the Sage Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Not religious, but on a sperr of the moment used that phrase. I would of said that its everyone's "absolute right" if it had came to mind sooner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altαir Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 I really think there is no establishment here other than: "This is the internet." Maybe it's just me, but rights here are not protected by any form of leadership. Your rights are gained and destroyed by the interactions with others on this so called "internet". What is this "internet" anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40kendgame Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 On a side-note - I'm not really childish' date=' I speak more the truth than the rest of you. It's pure obvious that you made this thread against Umbra and against the Advanced Clause, no matter what claims you might make you didn't. :/[/center'] Barak Obama couldn't have said that better... and I believe the term that fits him is elitist? Forget the forum administration... I am reporting you to Bill O'reily. Anyway, you are chewing the RPers to bits. I suggest you stop looking to get RPers banned, and start RPing yourself. On a side note, even though you may have reported me several times, I have never been banned, and my warning level has always been 0%. Basically, I never consciously broke a rule even though there have been reports made against me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 I really think there is no establishment here other than: "This is the internet." Maybe it's just me' date=' but rights here are not protected by any form of leadership. Your rights are gained and destroyed by the interactions with others on this so called "internet". What is this "internet" anyway?[/quote'] Well, anything on this forum can be edited, deleted, moved, replaced, and suspended. So, there isn't much freedom on the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Um, there is no possible way for that to happen. For one, the "owners" would just control who posted in their threads, which in return would lower the amount of posting, both good, and bad. Plus, there is no way to give the "owners" control over their own thread, without giving them Super powers. The Moderator Power Settings, are not as nimble on MyBB as you think they are. They just aren't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake the Sage Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 If the Administrators think its harmful or in bad taste, then yes they can remove it. But once again I do not think that Falling Pizza OR YCMaker are going to go through every single thread and cencor what they personally don't like. Golden Light- International, national and regional standards recognise that freedom of speech, as one form of freedom of expression, applies to any medium, including the Internet. As for what the internet is- its a series of computers hooked up to each other by a main server within each specific region. Bloodrun- Ah, thank you for explaining that to me. Hmmm, my theory has alot of holes. Didn't see that coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 I kind of feel this thread should be moved to debates, since we kind of stopped talking about the actual suggestion back on page 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake the Sage Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Yeah. Is there anyway to do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altαir Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Jake, I was wondering what got so tedious and tangled about YCM that you had to completely change the whole set-up of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Ask Icy, I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 There isn't a reason for this to be moved to debates, it's not a debate. The suggestion has been talked about on both sides, and should be locked for future consideration before things get out of hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake the Sage Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Golden Light- Well not much to be honest. But I think if this theory of mine can be worked on have the "bugs worked out" then YCM would work more smoothly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40kendgame Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Golden Light- Well not much to be honest. But I think if this theory of mine can be worked on have the "bugs worked out" then YCM would work more smoothly. I agree, except with the fact that this would allow thread owners to mini-mod. Remove that, and it will work. I shall say no more, and leave this topic alone for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.