iAmNateXero Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Discuss this card and its effect. Contentious Spell.After Activation declare 1 card name. All face up monsters name(s) is treated as the declared cards name. Please me YCM-kun. EDIT: Also, where does this card belong on a list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Can be used for CED? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 I would probably troll it into some kind of Harpie Lady deck. Or use it to blow up more MT's with Stratos. I can't really think of anything gamebreaking this card would accomplish, except making it so Sirocco pumps his target using every monster on the field. On a list, um...well it's gotta be 3 or 0 since I don't see it multiple copies of itself working in any kind of broken way. And unless I'm not realizing some combo that's absolutely crazy, I think it'd be fine at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Makes Cyber End very possible. But it breaks archtypes. If you play it against an archtype deck it can1.Stop Blackwing speacial summons and there Synchros2.Lightsorns arent as affected. It stops Garoth and thats about it3.Glads cant use contact fusing or War Chariot4.Six Sams can't do ANYTHING5.Jams Code-A and the Cosmic fortress for Alien decks. Therefore, as it breaks multiple strategies and may break many more in the future, it should be bannable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Makes Cyber End very possible. But it breaks archtypes. If you play it against an archtype deck it can1.Stop Blackwing speacial summons and there Synchros2.Lightsorns arent as affected. It stops Garoth and thats about it3.Glads cant use contact fusing or War Chariot4.Six Sams can't do ANYTHING5.Jams Code-A and the Cosmic fortress for Alien decks. Therefore' date=' as it breaks multiple strategies and may break many more in the future, it should be bannable.[/quote'] I didn't think about affecting opponent's plans. Good point. It doesn't need a combo, it would just go in every side deck to wreck the above decktypes. And even if you are playing an archetype deck, you can just call a card from your archetype (like blackwing - gale), and nothing you do is really hurt. It becomes who draws that card first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lawless Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Kira summed it up.Wouldn't do much outside of break strategies or open up a few kinda meh ones like CED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 YCM-kun is the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 it only effects cards that rely on names, so I would be uneffected, since spellcounters don`t work that way, but it would break a lot of arch-types since they rely on the names more often than other decks. I would like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 it only effects cards that rely on names' date=' so I would be uneffected, since spellcounters don`t work that way, but it would break a lot of arch-types since they rely on the names more often than other decks. I would like that.[/quote'] My Fishys are happy with it but my Morphs are pissed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 There are alot of talk about breaking apart Arch types, but what about making them stronger? IE All glad beast names are Bestiari. I know you can do it YCM-kun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 There are alot of talk about breaking apart Arch types' date=' but what about making them stronger? IE All glad beast names are Bestiari. I know you can do it YCM-kun.[/quote'] Thats more reason this should be banned. 1.All Monsters are Morphs. Summon Radion and Boarden. Stardust becomes absolute. 2.All monsters are BW. Summoning Armor Master becomes as easy as DSF 3.All monsters are Aliens. Code-A spam becomes unstoppable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 YCM-Kun' date=' I yern for your logic[/quote'] wow ur so smrt There are alot of talk about breaking apart Arch types' date=' but what about making them stronger? IE All glad beast names are Bestiari. I know you can do it YCM-kun.[/quote'] If we have list control, Gyzarus is already banned and it doesn't matter anyway. Really, this just punishes specific Archetypes for no good reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Can Ycm-kun argue how it would be good for the game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 No. It wouldnt be good at all. It can break strategus by itself and it can make them un-breakable by itself. Not happening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Can Ycm-kun argue how it would be good for the game? i think u shud back2tcgplayer-sama. Next guy to use "YCM-kun" gets shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 What about this card. Quickplay Spell card.Go back one phase (for lack of better OCG). Players do not Change Turns. Can Ycm-kun argue how it would be good for the game? i think u shud back2tcgplayer-sama. Next guy to use "YCM-kun" gets shot.Stop trolling, it upsets YCM-kun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 YCM-Kun is stupid. Also your quick play spell equals two times the effects of end phase cards. Solar Flare Dragon spam gets fun. You can hurt Ko'i Meiru players. BUT it would technically allow you to play in your end phase and it would skip the main. That would stop all summoning from your opponet. Edit it so that it goes back to the phase it was at because NOW it skips your opponets whole turn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Alrigth, edited. @ ~ P O L A R I S ~: TCGplayer-sama doesn't have the mental capacity to allow critical thinking. They are still stuck on "Well if it hasn't won/ topped any event, it must not be broken." I give YCM-kun a little more credit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 I would say it's OK ONLY if when you re-enter your battle phase, would you be able to re-attack? Because thre dual attacking monsters say "This card could attack twice PER BATTLE PHASE" so at the very east theese guys would get 4 attacks in one turn now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 [align=center]Ppls talking about CC's in my TCG! RAEG![/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Thats up for YCM-kun to decide. These cards have no real rulings, so its up to you to decide what isn't obvious. In this case, will monsters be able to attack twice if you enter the battle phase twice? Would you be able to draw again if you enter the draw phase twice. Is Having a battle phase, then going back to a Main phase, then back to a battle phase too broken? What about Double End phase procedures? Would LS be doomed? o.O The anticipation is too much to bare YCM-kun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Yes it would be broken to re-attack I think the ruling, based on how the dual attack monsters are worded, would say you could attack again by re-entering the battle and by the time this could kill LS they would have destroyed it with JD. Double draw phase wouldnt be too harmful EXCEPT when you have somthig like Heart of the Underdog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 The Quick-Play Spell, at its very worst, just gets activated in the Standby Phase and replaces itself immediately. Were it not for the fact that it could be drawn by a card effect in a Main Phase or something rather than in the Draw Phase, that alone would be grounds for banning it (since it would effectively reduce the minimum deck size to 37 and be auto-included in everything). However, since its effect is also at its very worst "all of your monsters can attack twice as many times this turn", anyone arguing for it to be legal would be out of their minds. This isn't even debatable; it's as if Limiter Removal lost its Machines-only restriction and the self-destruct side effect. It would be almost understandable if attacking worked like it does in Magic, which would mean that a monster couldn't attack twice unless it had a Vigilance-esque effect, but that's not the case here. The Continuous Spell is actually mildly interesting in terms of what YCM-kun says about it, but the Quick-Play Spell is just too stupidly broken for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 With that [/topic] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 With that [/topic] Only Crab can insult YCM-kun. [/topic] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.