CrabHelmet Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 the one where MST cannot negate spells and traps Yeah' date=' I'd remove both this and that ruling where Destiny Draw doesn't let you destroy all monsters your opponent controls. Those rulings suck. Ah, finally... You could not reveal "Evil Hero Dark Gaia", because it does not specifically name any Fusion Material Monsters. This one has always been bothering me. And this is the BKSS ruling (woah, haven't used that term for a long time), because Future Fusion is worded the same way (AFAIK, in the TCG) and CAN be used on Dark Gaia & Co. So why not Prisma? It's probably just a question of game balance. Otherwise, Prisma would become a highly-searchable and well-supported Foolish on a 1700 ATK body for any Warrior, Dragon, Fiend, Rock, Machine, EARTH, WATER, Gladiator Beast, Gemini, Worm, and eventually LIGHT if they release the relevant Manga E-Hero. The ruling where your limited to 3 copies of each card in your deck? A deck of 40 exodia pieces would be awesome. More like 5 Exodia pieces and 35 Upstart Goblin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 More like 5 Exodia pieces and 35 Upstart Goblin. Why Goblin Over Pot of Greed? + prepares to take sips + EDIT: Not saying Greed is better, just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 More like 5 Exodia pieces and 35 Upstart Goblin. Why Goblin Over Pot of Greed? + prepares to take sips + Because Pot of Greed is banned, silly. Armadillo just wished that the Unlimited = Limited To 3 rule were removed, not that the banlist were removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 More like 5 Exodia pieces and 35 Upstart Goblin. Why Goblin Over Pot of Greed? + prepares to take sips + Because Pot of Greed is banned' date=' silly.[/quote'] *facepalm* lolycmme Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 So it would be:Exodia x5Upstart Goblin x34Blackwing - Gale the Whirlwind x1?....well that's how I would do it..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling where your limited to 3 copies of each card in your deck? A deck of 40 exodia pieces would be awesome. More like 5 Exodia pieces and 35 Upstart Goblin. IMO, Anime decks are better D= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charizard Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 I would change all the staples to unlimited :). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 I would change all the staples to unlimited :). This is not a ruling >.< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 this "miss the timing shiz" it's driving me insane sometimes :D This. If it WAS a ruling, I would remove the difference between "destroy" and "send to graveyard". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 the complex damage step sheet, i cant be funked when using or facing ls going damagestep phase 1 anything?damagestep phase 2 anything?damagestep phase3 anythingdamagecalculation anything? ect also the thing that says only atk and defence altering things can olny be used in the damagestep yet searchers work ect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 That discarding was considered an effect ALL the time... (stupid 'Considered a Cost' rule...)Dark World FTW XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERYUGI!GO!! Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 the ruling that you cant attack the first turn of a duel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Von Csent Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The nomi ruling or the discard cost/effect ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The Prisma and Rainbow Neos ruling about not being able to ditch Rainbow Dragon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERYUGI!GO!! Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The Prisma and Rainbow Neos ruling about not being able to ditch Rainbow Dragon. but jaden did it episode 155 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The Prisma and Rainbow Neos ruling about not being able to ditch Rainbow Dragon. but jaden did it episode 155 Yah, because the show ALWAYS plays by the rules.lolYCM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The Prisma and Rainbow Neos ruling about not being able to ditch Rainbow Dragon. but jaden did it episode 155 Yah' date=' because the show ALWAYS plays by the rules.lolYCM[/quote'] Plus, its Jaden. He and every other charactor can "bend" the rules.As long as it is in his/her favor. Serously... Thats Yugoh 101, how do you people not know this stuff? O,o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling that Night Assailaint cantg target itself when you discard it. I would love this as it makes snipe hunter a costless Judgment Dragon That discarding was considered an effect ALL the time... (stupid 'Considered a Cost' rule...)Dark World FTW XD^my choice The Prisma and Rainbow Neos ruling about not being able to ditch Rainbow Dragon. Last time I checked it was taken off. infact a judge checked and said the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Here is an idea, Remove the ruling that says you need tributes for high level monsters. Duelist Kingdom ftw :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 On second thought, i'd erase the ruling that Solemn/Black Horn/Rai-Oh can't stop summon's caused by card effects. The nomi ruling was just something that peeved me but this seems genuinely good for the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 The Prisma and Rainbow Neos ruling about not being able to ditch Rainbow Dragon. Last time I checked it was taken off. infact a judge checked and said the same thing. Do you have a link to a website that says so? Wiki still says you can't :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 The Prisma and Rainbow Neos ruling about not being able to ditch Rainbow Dragon. Last time I checked it was taken off. infact a judge checked and said the same thing. Do you have a link to a website that says so? Wiki still says you can't :/ it was lolwikia that had it taken off last I checked, and a judge checked it up too, but idk... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 n/m, it'd still be bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkillzKill Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 I would erase the ruling that Light and Darkness Dragon is affected by Shrink, because it makes no sense whatsoever that Light and Darkness Dragon cannot negate Shrink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 I would erase the ruling that Light and Darkness Dragon is affected by Shrink' date=' because it makes no sense whatsoever that Light and Darkness Dragon cannot negate Shrink.[/quote'] I can find no such ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.