~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 ...What would it be? You cannot activate "Triangle Ecstasy Spark" if "Harpie Lady Sisters" is not on the field. That one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff! Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Rampart Blaster's infamous BKSS ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The dumb "nomis can't be brought back by ignoring summoning condition cards unless they were properly summoned first" ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Frostpaw Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The dumb "nomis can't be brought back by ignoring summoning condition cards unless they were properly summoned first" ruling. That one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Isn't there one that lets Oppression negate things like Gale's Shrink effect? Probably that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 I wanna be able to discard Horus LV 8 then summon it with Level Modulation...And the Nomi thing. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted July 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 I wanna be able to discard Horus LV 8 then summon it with Level Modulation...And the Nomi thing. XD That IS the nomi thing. =P The only "supposed Summoning condition overrider" is Ultimate Ancient Gear Golem's effect if I remember correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Isn't there one that lets Oppression negate things like Gale's Shrink effect? Probably that one. I can't think of a ruling that will improve my deck when I remove it so I'll go with this one. It's just stupid. Edit: Maybe this "miss the timing shiz" it's driving me insane sometimes :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling that Night Assailaint cantg target itself when you discard it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling that dosent let you use Luminas effect to discard a card in your hand if there are no 'Sworns in the grave. D}= He dissaproves of that ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling that dosent let you use Luminas effect to discard a card in your hand if there are no 'Sworns in the grave. D}= He dissaproves of that ruling. nvm I change mine to that one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Zombie Master's inability to Summon the card you discarded for his effect if there is no other target in the graveyard. And Crab, you mean this ruling? For the effects of "Tragoedia" which give you control of an opponent's monster and which changes its Level' date=' and the effect of "Blackwing - Gale the Whirlwind" which halves the ATK and DEF of an opponent's monster, these effects cannot Special Summon a monster at resolution, so the effect of "Royal Oppression" cannot be chained to these effects. Also, "Royal Oppression" cannot negate the effect of "Tragoedia" which Special Summons it because the effect activates during the Damage Step.[19'] I don't really understand why Gale is even mentioned, as it goes on to describe why effects that special summon monsters at resolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Probably something niev having to do with the damage step. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Zombie Master's inability to Summon the card you discarded for his effect if there is no other target in the graveyard. Same with Lumina D}= Very Annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling that Night Assailaint cantg target itself when you discard it. But then it would be banworthy. Zombie Master's inability to Summon the card you discarded for his effect if there is no other target in the graveyard. And Crab' date=' you mean this ruling? For the effects of "Tragoedia" which give you control of an opponent's monster and which changes its Level, and the effect of "Blackwing - Gale the Whirlwind" which halves the ATK and DEF of an opponent's monster, these effects cannot Special Summon a monster at resolution, so the effect of "Royal Oppression" cannot be chained to these effects. Also, "Royal Oppression" cannot negate the effect of "Tragoedia" which Special Summons it because the effect activates during the Damage Step.[19] I don't really understand why Gale is even mentioned, as it goes on to describe why effects that special summon monsters at resolution. I thought there was a ruling (OCG-exclusive?) that said the opposite - Oppression can negate any effect used by a card that also possesses a Special Summon effect - but the Wiki's rulings list has no such ruling and several rulings saying the opposite, so I'm probably misremembering. In that case, I'll go with the ruling that you can't Solemn a Nephthys, and related rulings that limit Solemn's ability to negate Special Summons that aren't Summon effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 the one where MST cannot negate spells and traps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 the one where MST cannot negate spells and traps This is not a ruling. This is part of the effect of MST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Ah, finally... You could not reveal "Evil Hero Dark Gaia", because it does not specifically name any Fusion Material Monsters. This one has always been bothering me. And this is the BKSS ruling (woah, haven't used that term for a long time), because Future Fusion is worded the same way (AFAIK, in the TCG) and CAN be used on Dark Gaia & Co. So why not Prisma? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Ah' date=' finally... You could not reveal "Evil Hero Dark Gaia", because it does not specifically name any Fusion Material Monsters. This one has always been bothering me. And this is the BKSS ruling (woah, haven't used that term for a long time), because Future Fusion is worded the same way (AFAIK, in the TCG) and CAN be used on Dark Gaia & Co. So why not Prisma? *facepalm*This is what I want to change. It's so annoying that I can't dump fusion replacements with prisma ;( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling where your limited to 3 copies of each card in your deck? A deck of 40 exodia pieces would be awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling where your limited to 3 copies of each card in your deck? A deck of 40 exodia pieces would be awesome. No. Then you should change the ban list too, because they are limited :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling where your limited to 3 copies of each card in your deck? A deck of 40 exodia pieces would be awesome.No.Exodia pieces x5Pot of Greed x36SUPAH WIN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 I'd go with the Level Modulation one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 The ruling where your limited to 3 copies of each card in your deck? A deck of 40 exodia pieces would be awesome.No.Exodia pieces x5Pot of Greed x36SUPAH WIN Dude, If you could be all like: "IT IZ TROO DAT DA EXODEEA PEECEZ R RARE, BUT I TRIEV ON RARE CARDS! *pulls out Exodia Deck* CHEX DIS OUT, U NOOB!"(^Rare hunter parody^) And the opponet would die from awesomeness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted July 15, 2009 Report Share Posted July 15, 2009 Ah' date=' finally... You could not reveal "Evil Hero Dark Gaia", because it does not specifically name any Fusion Material Monsters. This one has always been bothering me. And this is the BKSS ruling (woah, haven't used that term for a long time), because Future Fusion is worded the same way (AFAIK, in the TCG) and CAN be used on Dark Gaia & Co. So why not Prisma? *facepalm*This is what I want to change. It's so annoying that I can't dump fusion replacements with prisma ;( Ahum, you're using 'facepalm' wrong. The ruling where your limited to 3 copies of each card in your deck? A deck of 40 exodia pieces would be awesome. If you'd be allowed to completely ignoring the ban list' date=' and you'd make a deck with 40 Exodia pieces, you'd be doing it terribly wrong. The ruling where your limited to 3 copies of each card in your deck? A deck of 40 exodia pieces would be awesome.No.Exodia pieces x5Pot of Greed x36SUPAH WIN NO! 1x Exodia1x Left Leg1x Left Arm1x Right Leg1x Right Arm34x Pot of Greed1x Mechanical Snail Never forget. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.