.Frostpaw Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 Every piece of exodia was at 3 per deck? I say that Exodia decks would become meta. Lol, I'm going to build a deck with 3 of every piece except only 1 head(I only own one.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 The hand could get cloggy rather easily. You could run more discards to get rid of extra parts, but I dunno. FTKs everywhere, perhaps. Edit: Also, What's the point in making an illegal deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 Even the anime knew that running 15 Exodia pieces gives you hands full of trash, and that was when they were just barely beginning to use the actual rules of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 Not good, your hand would be full of weak monsters. But it would work with Contract with Exodia, since you'll have a lot of chances to ditch them. Or Exodius, because all the limb parts are Normal Monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 What would happen if you stopped making these threads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.F.Yuji Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 I actually made a deck with three Exodia Pieces each on '09, Along with 3 Sangan, 3 Witches, 3 Pot of Greed's, 3 Graceful Charity, 3 Magical Mallets, and whatever else I could use for draw/trade in power, I kept getting a FTK each and every time, Maybe that's why those cards are limited/Forbidden XD. Anyway we all know it would never happen, But if it didNot good' date=' your hand would be full of weak monsters.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.